Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ninova, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Ninova, M..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

NEIL2 regulates RNA polymerase II dynamics to suppress transcription replication conflicts in pancreatic cancer

Transcription replication conflicts (TRCs) arise from spatiotemporal interference between replication and transcription machinery and contribute to genome instability in cancer cells. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells, oncogenic KRAS drives TRC formation, and base excision repair (BER) contributes to TRC resolution as an adaptive response. Here, we show that TRCs are enriched in pancreatic tumor sections from patients and are associated with malignant progression. We identify NEIL2, a bifunctional DNA glycosylase in the BER pathway, as a critical regulator of TRCs in PDAC cells. Mechanistically, NEIL2 loss causes aberrant RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) occupancy at transcription start sites and downstream of transcription end sites. Dysregulated RNAPII dynamics promote R-loop-dependent and -independent TRCs contributing to replication stress, DNA damage, and impaired cancer cell proliferation. Notably, the DNA-binding motif of NEIL2 necessary for canonical BER function is dispensable for TRC regulation. Together, these findings reveal an unrecognized role for NEIL2 in regulating RNAPII dynamics and mitigating TRCs in pancreatic cancer cells.

molecular biology↗

The novel HP1a interactor Clump/CG30403 safeguards transposon silencing and reproductive resilience in the Drosophila ovary

Heterochromatin and its core effectors from the Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) family are essential for epigenetic silencing of repetitive regions and genome integrity from yeast to humans. However, how HP1s and associated factors regulate heterochromatin properties in vivo to sustain silencing across development, aging, and environmental factors, remains incompletely understood. Here, we identify Clump/CG30403 -- a previously uncharacterized MADF-BESS domain protein -- as a novel heterochromatin factor required for robust transposon silencing during Drosophila oogenesis and sustained fertility with age and temperature stress. Clump/CG30403 interacts with the main HP1-family silencing effector Su(var)205/HP1a through a noncanonical binding motif within its large intrinsically disordered region. Notably, in the absence of Clump/CG30403, HP1a mobility and silencing capacity are compromised despite largely unperturbed genomic distribution, showing that HP1a presence alone is insufficient for repression. We also show that Clump/CG30403 uniquely accumulates at its own promoter to self-repress and prevent ectopic aggregation, revealing a feedback mechanism to constrain protein dosage and phase behavior. Overall, we propose that Clump/CG30403 is a HP1 corepressor that acts as a tightly calibrated safeguard of the heterochromatin environment properties to ensure stable silencing, genome integrity, and persistent reproductive function.

molecular biology↗

SUMOylation of Bonus, the Drosophila homolog of Transcription Intermediary Factor 1, safeguards germline identity by recruiting repressive chromatin complexes to silence tissue-specific genes

The conserved family of Transcription Intermediary Factors (TIF1) proteins consists of key transcriptional regulators that control transcription of target genes by modulating chromatin state. Unlike mammals that have four TIF1 members, Drosophila only encodes one member of the family, Bonus. Bonus has been implicated in embryonic development and organogenesis and shown to regulate several signaling pathways, however, its targets and mechanism of action remained poorly understood. We found that knockdown of Bonus in early oogenesis results in severe defects in ovarian development and in ectopic expression of genes that are normally repressed in the germline, demonstrating its essential function in the ovary. Recruitment of Bonus to chromatin leads to silencing associated with accumulation of the repressive H3K9me3 mark. We show that Bonus associates with the histone methyltransferase SetDB1 and the chromatin remodeler NuRD and depletion of either component releases Bonus-induced repression. We further established that Bonus is SUMOylated at a single site at its N-terminus that is conserved among insects and this modification is indispensable for Bonuss repressive activity. SUMOylation influences Bonuss subnuclear localization, its association with chromatin and interaction with SetDB1. Finally, we showed that Bonus SUMOylation is mediated by the SUMO E3-ligase Su(var)2-10, revealing that although SUMOylation of TIF1 proteins is conserved between insects and mammals, both the mechanism and specific site of modification is different in the two taxa. Together, our work identified Bonus as a regulator of tissue-specific gene expression and revealed the importance of SUMOylation as a regulator of complex formation in the context of transcriptional repression.

molecular biology↗

Pervasive SUMOylation of heterochromatin and piRNA pathway proteins

Genome regulation involves complex and highly regulated protein interactions that are often mediated through post-translational modifications (PTMs). SUMOylation - the covalent attachment of the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) - is a conserved PTM in eukaryotes that has been implicated in a number of essential processes such as nuclear import, DNA damage repair, transcriptional control, and chromatin organization. In Drosophila, SUMO is essential for viability and its depletion from the female germline causes infertility associated with global loss of heterochromatin, and illicit upregulation of transposons and lineage-inappropriate genes. However, the specific targets of SUMO and its mechanistic role in different cellular pathways are still poorly understood. Here, we developed a proteomics-based strategy to characterize the SUMOylated proteome in Drosophila that allowed us to identify ~1500 SUMO sites in 843 proteins in the fly ovary. A high-confidence set of SUMOylated proteins is highly enriched in factors involved in heterochromatin regulation and several different aspects of the piRNA pathway that represses transposons, including piRNA biogenesis and function. Furthermore, we show that SUMOylation of several piRNA pathway proteins occurs in a Piwi-dependent manner, indicating a functional implication of this modification in the cellular response to transposon activity. Together, these data highlight the impact of SUMOylation on epigenetic regulation and reveal an unexpectedly broad role of the SUMO pathway in the cellular defense against genomic parasites. Finally, this work provides a valuable resource and a system that can be adapted to the study of SUMOylation in other Drosophila tissues.

molecular biology↗

Repression of interrupted and intact rDNA by the SUMO pathway in Drosophila melanogaster

Ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) are essential components of the ribosome and are among the most abundant macromolecules in the cell. To ensure high rRNA level, eukaryotic genomes contain dozens to hundreds of rDNA genes, however, only a fraction of the rRNA genes seems to be active, while others are transcriptionally silent. We found that individual rDNA genes have high level of cell-to-cell heterogeneity in their expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Insertion of heterologous sequences into rDNA leads to repression associated with reduced expression in individual cells and decreased number of cells expressing rDNA with insertions. We found that SUMO (Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier) and SUMO ligase Ubc9 are required for efficient repression of interrupted rDNA units and variable expression of intact rDNA. Disruption of the SUMO pathway abolishes discrimination of interrupted and intact rDNAs and removes cell-to-cell heterogeneity leading to uniformly high expression of individual rDNA in single cells. Our results suggest that the SUMO pathway is responsible for both repression of interrupted units and control of intact rDNA expression.

molecular biology↗

pAgo-induced DNA interference protects bacteria from invader DNA

Members of the conserved Argonaute protein family use small RNA guides to find their mRNA targets to regulate gene expression and suppress mobile genetic elements in eukaryotes. Argonautes are also present in many bacterial and archaeal species 1-3. Unlike eukaryotic proteins, several studied prokaryotic Argonautes use small DNA guides to cleave DNA, a process dubbed DNA interference 4-8. However, the natural functions and targets of DNA interference are poorly understood and the mechanisms of DNA guide generation and target discrimination remain unknown. Here, we studied the in vivo activities of a bacterial Argonaute nuclease CbAgo and demonstrated that it induces cleavage of multicopy genetic elements, including plasmids, transposons and repetitive chromosomal loci. Generation of small DNA guides employed by CbAgo requires cooperation between its intrinsic endonuclease activity and the cellular double-strand break repair machinery. The mechanism of guide generation ensures that small DNA guides are enriched in sequences that target foreign DNA and endows CbAgo with capacity to eliminate plasmids and fight phage infection. Similar principles may underlie the specificity of self-nonself discrimination by diverse defense systems in prokaryotes.

molecular biology↗

The SUMO ligase Su(var)2-10 links piRNA-guided target recognition to chromatin silencing

Regulation of transcription is the main mechanism responsible for precise control of gene expression. While the majority of transcriptional regulation is mediated by a multitude of DNA-binding transcription factors that bind to regulatory gene regions, an elegant alternative strategy employs small RNA guides, piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) to identify targets of transcriptional repression. Here we show that in Drosophila the small ubiquitin-like protein SUMO and the SUMO E3 ligase Su(var)2-10 are required for piRNA-guided deposition of repressive chromatin marks and transcriptional silencing of piRNA targets. Su(var)2-10 links the piRNA-guided target recognition complex to the silencing effector by binding the piRNA/Piwi complex and inducing SUMO-dependent recruitment of the SetDB1/Wde histone methyltransferase effector. We propose that in Drosophila, the nuclear piRNA pathway has co-opted a conserved mechanism of SUMO-dependent recruitment of the SetDB1/Wde chromatin modifier to confer repression of genomic parasites. Highlights- piRNA-induced transposon silencing requires SUMO and the SUMO E3 ligase Su(var)2-10 - Su(var)2-10 links the target recognition complex to the silencing effector - Su(var)2-10 binds the piRNA-guided target recognition complex and deposits SUMO on target chromatin - Su(var)2-10 induces SUMO-dependent recruitment of the SetDB1/Wde histone methyltransferase to target loci

molecular biology↗

The SUMO ligase Su(var)2-10 controls eu- and heterochromatic gene expression via establishment of H3K9 trimethylation and negative feedback regulation

Chromatin is critical for genome compaction and gene expression. On a coarse scale, the genome is divided into euchromatin, which harbors the majority of genes and is enriched in active chromatin marks, and heterochromatin, which is gene-poor but repeat-rich. The conserved molecular hallmark of heterochromatin is the H3K9me3 modification, which is associated with gene silencing. We found that in Drosophila deposition of most of the H3K9me3 mark depends on SUMO and the SUMO-ligase Su(var)2-10, which recruits the histone methyltransferase complex SetDB1/Wde. In addition to repressing repeats, H3K9me3 also influences expression of both hetero- and euchromatic host genes. High H3K9me3 levels in heterochromatin are required to suppress spurious non-canonical transcription and ensure proper gene expression. In euchromatin, a set of conserved genes is repressed by Su(var)2-10/SetDB1-induced H3K9 trimethylation ensuring tissue-specific gene expression. Several components of heterochromatin are themselves repressed by this pathway providing a negative feedback mechanism to ensure chromatin homeostasis. Highlights- Proper expression of host genes residing in heterochromatin requires Su(var)2-10-dependent installation of the H3K9me3 mark to suppress spurious non-canonical transcription. - A set of euchromatic host genes is repressed by transposon-independent installation of H3K9me3 in a process that depends on Su(var)2-10 and SUMO. - Installation of H3K9me3 via Su(var)2-10 ensures tissue-specific gene expression. - H3K9me3-dependent silencing of genes encoding proteins involved in heterochromatin formation provides negative feedback regulation to maintain heterochromatin homeostasis.

molecular biology↗