Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nikitin, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Nikitin, D..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

2,234 attempts to harmonize a multi-platform B-cell lymphoma bulk transcriptomic dataset: ComBat is superior by cross-batch prediction quality

Background. Cross-platform transcriptomic harmonization benchmarks rely on individual success metric each: correlation with a reference profile, classifier accuracy, or a composite imported from single-cell integration. We found no published study that computes multiple orthogonal metric classes over one set of harmonization approaches and measures overlapping between the best approaches by these metrics. Methods. We used the 2,234 approaches of the recent real-world benchmark on 7,174 B-cell lymphoma transcriptomes. They combine 31 harmonization methods, 14 batch-removal strategies, three imputations and two post-removal settings. We assigned its 87 polarity-adjusted scoring metrics, out of 344 registered, to five classes (global, local, distributional, structural and composite) and added three biology-facing classes: within-cohort marker correlation (L), cross-batch rank agreement of a marker panel (M), and leave-one-batch-out (LOBO) prediction of lymphoma subtypes and normal B cells (N). Each class resulted in top 112 approaches (5%), and we measured overlap by the Jaccard index. Results. Harmonization methods of high harshness such as quantile normalization matched different batches to the same shape of distribution but were inferior by local and global metrics. Local and composite metrics resulted in the largest overlap of best approaches (71 shared). Classes L and M, M and N shared no approach, whereas L and N shared one approach without harmonization under the rare-batches-removed strategy, and all three overlaps were significantly below the random expectation. Class N resulted in the ComBat family in 84 of its 112 places. Class M elected only 10_mnn and 12_scanorama, methods that completely corrupted biology by correlation. Conclusions. Best transcriptomic harmonization approach is highly contingent on the quality metrics used, with metric classes trade-offing between each other. We provide a six-step recipe for metric classes, their thresholds and the cross-batch tests for selecting the best approaches.

bioinformatics↗

Benchmarking of bulk transcriptomic harmonization tools in a multi-platform B-cell lymphoma cohort identifies feature-specific quantile normalization and surrogate variable analysis as top-performing methods

Cross-platform harmonization of bulk transcriptomic datasets remains a fundamental challenge for developing cancer biomarkers because of persistent unresolved batch effects. Most harmonization tools are benchmarked on datasets with large inter-group biological differences (for example TCGA tumor types), whereas actionable biomarker mining requires preserving subtle transcriptional distinctions between closely related diagnoses. Here we present ComboBatch, a benchmarking pipeline that evaluates the full cross-product of 14 batch-removal strategies, 3 imputation methods, 33 harmonization algorithms and 2 post-removal conditions across 7,174 samples from 88 germinal-center B-cell lymphoma cohorts spanning four transcriptomic platforms. Scoring 87 quality metrics across 2,234 harmonization approaches, we show that method choice (R2 0.36) and batch-removal strategy (0.26) are the principal determinants of harmonization quality, whereas imputation (0.016) and post-removal (<0.01) are secondary. Feature Specific Quantile Normalization and Surrogate Variable Analysis were the top methods, jointly resolving follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and normal germinal-center B-cell differences in multi-platform and RNA-seq-only compositions, respectively. We provide a data-driven five-scenario decision tree for harmonization method selection, applicable to any retrospective multi-platform transcriptomic study. The ComboBatch pipeline is available on GitHub and can be used for harmonization, allowing bioinformaticians to utilize 33 harmonization and 3 imputation methods according to their needs.

cancer biology↗

Transposable element-host genome evolutionary arms race revealed by multi-modal epigenomic profiling in a telomere-to-telomere human genome reference

For a quarter of a century transposable elements have been recognized as a major component of the human genome, comprising 46.1% according to recent estimates, and as key drivers of regulatory innovation as well as participants in an ongoing evolutionary arms race with host defense systems. Using the newly released T2T ENCODE dataset, we quantified the epigenetic impact of 3.7 million transposable elements across evolutionary time by analyzing seven epigenomic modalities in twelve human cell lines, spanning six transposon classes, 44 families, and 1,122 subfamilies. We show that SVA elements exhibit the strongest signatures of the arms race, characterized by progressive escape from H3K9me3-mediated heterochromatinization accompanied by increased acquisition of CTCF binding and enhancer-associated chromatin marks. Among Alu elements, the AluYb8 and AluYb9 subfamilies display age-dependent accumulation of CTCF binding, while seven LTR subfamilies (HERV16-int, MER11C, LTR43-int, HERVE-int, LTR22C, LTR5_Hs, HERVIP10FH-int) demonstrate dynamic evolutionary behavior within active chromatin, H3K9me3 chromatin and CTCF contexts. We further evaluated the relative contribution of distinct epigenomic modalities to the host-transposable element conflict and found that transposon-driven evolution is dominated by evasion of host-imposed heterochromatinization primarily at H3K9me3 and secondarily at H3K27me3, together with progressive invasion into CTCF-rich regions. In contrast, enhancer, promoter, and H3K36me3 marks appear to play more limited roles. Collectively, these findings deepen our insight into the coevolutionary epigenomic dynamics between human genome and transposable elements and the associated processes driving regulatory innovation.

genomics↗

JOINT ANALYSIS OF HUMAN RETROELEMENTS-LINKED HISTONE MODIFICATION PROFILES REVEALS QUICKLY EVOLVING MOLECULAR PROCESSES CONNECTED WITH CANCER

Human retroelements (REs), which comprise approximately 40% of the genome, have played a pivotal role in the evolution of key molecular processes, such as placental development, by introducing novel regulatory elements near host gene promoters and enhancers. Despite their genomic abundance and regulatory influence, the functional trajectories of REs remain poorly understood. Here, leveraging ChIP-seq profiles of histone modifications (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9ac, H3K27ac, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3) from five human cell lines deposited in the ENCODE database, we systematically ranked the regulatory impact of REs across 25,075 human genes. Gene sets enriched for promoter- and enhancer-associated RE-linked regulatory sites were identified. Consensus gene sets across cell lines were found to be associated with pathways involved in cancer progression, specifically chronic myeloid leukemia and small cell lung cancer, as well as with host defense responses to infection with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1. These findings provide new insights into recent human evolution and highlight the ongoing influence of selfish genetic elements on genome regulation and disease susceptibility.

bioinformatics↗