Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nightingale, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Nightingale, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Pre-Omicron Immunity Generates IgG⁺ but Not IgA⁺ Memory B Cells Reactive to Omicron Spike Protein

The emergence of the Omicron variant marked a major antigenic shift from previous SARS-CoV-2 variants. While the emergence of new variants of concern was associated with loss of protection from infection, protection from serious disease was maintained. What was less clear was whether this protection was associated with expansion, affinity maturation of pre-existing cross-reactive B cells, or de novo generation of variant-specific B cells. To define the cross-reactivity of memory B cell populations generated through infection and/or vaccination with pre-Omicron variant spike, we utilised archived samples from healthcare workers enrolled in the extensively monitored Panther study cohort. Using samples collected from Omicron-naive individuals approximately three months (106 days) after a third BNT162b2 vaccine dose, we analyzed the spike-specific B cell repertoire via multiparameter flow cytometry and B cell receptor (BCR) sequencing. Reactivity to both Lineage A and Omicron spike proteins was higher for serum IgG than IgA, and serum neutralisation potency was significantly reduced against pseudoviruses bearing the Omicron spike compared to those with Lineage A spike. The frequency of Omicron-reactive IgA+ B cells was markedly lower than that of Lineage A-reactive cells, whereas Omicron-reactive IgG+ memory B cells were more frequent. These responses were predominantly localized to classical memory and double-negative (DN) B cell subsets. BCR sequencing of donors unexposed to Omicron confirmed that Omicron-binding clones were class-switched and somatically mutated, indicating they originated from pre-existing memory B cells primed by vaccination or infection. Our findings demonstrate that memory B cells generated through infection and/or immunisation with pre-Omicron variants were primed for broad antigenic recognition despite Omicrons extensive genetic divergence. However, the diminished IgA+ B cell frequency suggests a weakened mucosal antibody defence, potentially explaining the continued susceptibility to infection despite preserved protection from severe disease.

immunology↗

Development and application of eDNA-based tools for the conservation of white-clawed crayfish

O_LIeDNA-based methods represent non-invasive and cost-effective approaches for species monitoring and their application as a conservation tool has rapidly increased within the last decade. Currently, they are primarily used to determine the presence/absence of invasive, endangered or commercially important species, but they also hold potential to contribute to an improved understanding of the ecological interactions that drive species distribution. However, this next step of eDNA-based applications requires a thorough method development. C_LIO_LIWe developed an eDNA assay for the white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes), a flagship species of conservation in the UK. Multiple subsequent in-situ and ex-situ validation tests aimed at improving method performance allowed us to apply eDNA-based surveys to evaluate interactions between white-clawed crayfish, crayfish plague and invasive signal crayfish. C_LIO_LIThe assay performed well in terms of specificity (no detection of non-target DNA) and sensitivity, which was higher than more established traditional species survey methods. Quantification of species biomass was, however, less reliable. C_LIO_LIComparison of eDNA sampling methods (precipitation vs. various filtration approaches) revealed that optimal sampling method differed across environments and might depend on inhibitor concentrations. C_LIO_LIFinally, we applied our methodology together with established assays for crayfish plague and the invasive signal crayfish and demonstrated their significant interactions in a UK river system. C_LIO_LIOur analysis highlights the importance of thorough methodological development of eDNA-based assays. Only a critical evaluation of methodological strengths and weaknesses will allow us to capitalise on the full potential of eDNA-based methods and use them as decision support tools in environmental monitoring and conservation practices. C_LI

ecology↗