Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Neylan, I. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Neylan, I. P..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Genetic assimilation and accommodation shape adaptation to heat stress in a splash pool copepod

Understanding how organisms respond to variable environments is becoming increasingly important in our rapidly changing world. Beyond genetic adaptation, plastic responses to the environment can alter phenotypes and fitness, ultimately driving evolution. However, the interaction between plasticity and adaptation during environmental change is complex and hard to measure in natural systems. Here, we used two populations of Tigriopus californicus copepods, a thermally tolerant southern population and a thermally sensitive northern population, to conduct a fully factorial split brood experiment where we exposed animals as larvae and adults to either a sublethal heat stress or control (no heat treatment) before measuring heat tolerance and gene expression patterns. We found that increased thermal tolerance across populations came at the expense of physiological plasticity and evolved through higher baseline expression of heat stress response genes across environmental contexts as well as increased gene expression plasticity in response to heat stress. In the thermally sensitive northern population, developmental exposure to heat stress led to higher adult tolerance and lower physiological plasticity underpinned by higher gene expression plasticity. Importantly, we found that the same set of genes were largely responsible for both the evolved higher tolerance in the southern population and the developmentally induced tolerance in the northern population suggesting that in this system, a shared molecular response contributes to acclimation and adaptation across both populations. These results link existing physiological plasticity with long-term evolutionary responses providing insight into how these populations will adapt and respond to future environmental change. SIGNIFICANCEUnderstanding plastic and evolutionary responses to dynamic environments is critical to anticipating species vulnerability to climate change. In this study, we compared gene expression and physiological responses to heat stress across two populations of a marine copepod that differ in thermal tolerance to investigate mechanisms of adaptation. We found evidence for plasticity-led evolution in this system, with the same set of genes contributing to long-term evolutionary changes across populations and to short-term physiological adjustments within populations. Our results suggest that populations with a reservoir of plasticity have a greater potential to evolve as the climate continues to warm, but that there may be a limit to this adaptive capacity.

evolutionary biology↗

Context matters: A meta-analysis of the variable impact of transgenerational and developmental plasticity on responses to stress

O_LIUnderstanding organisms abilities to adapt and acclimate to stressors in their environments is essential for predicting the distributions and persistence of species and populations during environmental change. Beyond genetic adaptation, prior experiences with a given stressor across life stages can dictate how an individual will fare when exposed to that stressor again. There is now a robust literature on the impacts of parental experiences on offspring traits (transgenerational plasticity), plus an even broader literature on the carry-over effects of early-life experience on phenotypic outcomes (within-generational or developmental plasticity); however, less is understood about the relative strengths of these two forms of plasticity and how they interact to shape stress tolerance. C_LIO_LIWe explored these questions by conducting a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies that tested both within- and transgenerational effects of naturally occurring environmental stressors. In particular, we explored contextual moderators or predictor variables including the traits measured, the type of stressor, taxonomic group, and organismal life history traits to elucidate patterns and develop a predictive framework for when we should expect to see effects of transgenerational plasticity, within-generational plasticity, both, or neither. C_LIO_LIWe found that there was not a strong or consistent directional effect of either parental or early-life exposure on subsequent offspring traits. Instead, experimental context (what stressor was used and what traits were measured) as well as biological context (taxonomy, life history traits) were important predictors for understanding the strength and direction of plasticity. We found several contexts where there were meaningful effects of parental and early-life stress exposure and where there was evidence that these may interact to impact phenotypic and fitness outcomes. C_LIO_LIOur study highlights the need for careful consideration of context when exploring patterns of plasticity. We hope to underscore the need for additional, fully factorial studies that measure the interaction between these forms of plasticity across a variety of systems and stressors to better understand how stress may carry forward across life stages and generations. C_LI

ecology↗

Evolutionary history mediates population response to rapid environmental change through within-generational and transgenerational plasticity

Rapid environmental change is affecting many organisms; some are coping well but many species are in decline. A key mechanism for facilitating success following environmental change is phenotypic plasticity. Organisms use cues to respond phenotypically to environmental conditions; many incorporate recent information (within-generation plasticity) and information from previous generations (transgenerational plasticity). We extend an existing evolutionary model where organisms utilize within-generational plasticity, transgenerational plasticity, rapid evolution, and bet-hedging. We show how, when rapid evolution of plasticity is not possible, the effect of environmental change (altering the environment mean, variance, or autocorrelation, or cue reliability) on population growth rate depends on selection for within-generation plasticity and transgenerational plasticity under historical environmental conditions. We then evaluate the predictions that populations adapted to highly variable environments, or with greater within-generational plasticity, are more likely to successfully respond to environmental change. We identify when these predictions fail, and show environmental change is most detrimental when previously reliable cues become unreliable. When multiple cues become unreliable, environmental change can cause deleterious effects regardless of the populations evolutionary history. Overall, this work provides a general framework for understanding the role of plasticity in population responses to rapid environmental change.

evolutionary biology↗