Biology subjects

Newsome, W. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Newsome, W. T..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Brittleness in model selection analysis of single neuron firing rates

Models of complex heterogeneous systems like the brain are inescapably incomplete, and thus always falsified with enough data. As neural data grow in volume and complexity, absolute measures of adequacy are being replaced by model selection methods that rank the relative accuracy of competing theories. Selection still depends on incomplete mathematical instantiations, but the implicit expectation is that ranking is robust to their details. Here we highlight a contrary finding of \"brittleness,\" where data matching one theory conceptually are ranked closer to an instance of another. In particular, selection between recent models of decision making is conceptually misleading when data are simulated with minor distributional mismatch, with mixed secondary signals, or with non-stationary parameters; and decision-related responses in macaque cortex show features suggesting that these effects may impact empirical results. We conclude with recommendations to mitigate such brittleness when using model selection to study neural signals.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Population dynamics of choice representation in dorsal premotor and primary motor cortex

Studies in multiple species have revealed the existence of neural signals that lawfully co-vary with different aspects of the decision-making process, including choice, sensory evidence that supports the choice, and reaction time. These signals, often interpreted as the representation of a decision variable (DV), have been identified in several motor preparation circuits and provide insight about mechanisms underlying the decision-making process. However, single-trial dynamics of this process or its representation at the neural population level remain poorly understood. Here, we examine the representation of the DV in simultaneously recorded neural populations of dorsal premotor (PMd) and primary motor (M1) cortices of monkeys performing a random dots direction discrimination task with arm movements as the behavioral report. We show that single-trial DVs covary with stimulus difficulty in both areas but are stronger and appear earlier in PMd compared to M1 when the stimulus duration is fixed and predictable. When temporal uncertainty is introduced by making the stimulus duration variable, single-trial DV dynamics are accelerated across the board and the two areas become largely indistinguishable throughout the entire trial. These effects are not trivially explained by the faster emergence of motor kinematic signals in PMd and M1. All key aspects of the data were replicated by a computational model that relies on progressive recruitment of units with stable choice-related modulation of neural population activity. In contrast with several recent results in rodents, decision signals in PMd and M1 are not carried by short sequences of activity in non-overlapping groups of neurons but are instead distributed across many neurons, which once recruited, represent the decision stably during individual behavioral epochs of the trial.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Clustering and compositionality of task representations in a neural network trained to perform many cognitive tasks

A neural system has the ability to flexibly perform many tasks, but the underlying mechanism cannot be elucidated in traditional experimental and modeling studies designed for one task at a time. Here, we trained a single network model to perform 20 cognitive tasks that may involve working memory, decision-making, categorization and inhibitory control. We found that after training, recurrent units developed into clusters that are functionally specialized for various cognitive processes. We introduce a measure to quantify relationships between single-unit neural representations of tasks, and report five distinct types of such relationships that can be tested experimentally. Surprisingly, our network developed compositionality of task representations, a critical feature for cognitive flexibility, whereby one task can be performed by recombining instructions for other tasks. Finally, we demonstrate how the network could learn multiple tasks sequentially. This work provides a computational platform to investigate neural representations of many cognitive tasks.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Learning Fast And Slow: Deviations From The Matching Law Can Reflect An Optimal Strategy Under Uncertainty

Behavior which deviates from our normative expectations often appears irrational. A classic example concerns the question of how choice should be distributed among multiple alternatives. The so-called matching law predicts that the fraction of choices made to any option should match the fraction of total rewards earned from the option. This choice strategy can maximize reward in a stationary reward schedule. Empirically, however, behavior often deviates from this ideal. While such deviations have often been interpreted as reflecting noisy, suboptimal, decision-making, here we instead suggest that they reflect a strategy which is adaptive in nonstationary and uncertain environments. We analyze the results of a dynamic foraging task. Animals exhibited significant deviations from matching, and animals turned out to be able to collect more rewards when deviation was larger. We show that this behavior can be understood if one considers that animals had incomplete information about the environments dynamics. In particular, using computational models, we show that in such nonstationary environments, learning on both fast and slow timescales is beneficial. Learning on fast timescales means that an animal can react to sudden changes in the environment, though this inevitably introduces large fluctuations (variance) in value estimates. Concurrently, learning on slow timescales reduces the amplitude of these fluctuations at the price of introducing a bias that causes systematic deviations. We confirm this prediction in data - monkeys indeed solved the bias-variance tradeoff by combining learning on both fast and slow timescales. Our work suggests that multi-timescale learning could be a biologically plausible mechanism for optimizing decisions under uncertainty.

neuroscience↗