Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Neva, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Neva, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Increased perceived effort during contralateral thermal heat pain is not explained by increased intracortical and corticospinal inhibition.

BackgroundPain influences motor function and has been proposed to reduce corticospinal and intracortical excitability. At the same time, performance can be maintained during pain, at the cost of increased perceived effort, a centrally generated signal reflecting resource engagement. Here, we tested whether contralateral thermal heat pain-related changes in corticospinal and intracortical excitability contribute to increased effort perception. MethodsIn this preregistered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study, twenty-one healthy participants received single and paired pulse TMS at rest and during submaximal isometric right wrist flexions performed at 20% maximal peak force. Trials were conducted under a control condition or during contralateral thermal stimulation (painful or non-painful warm) applied to the left forearm. After each contraction, participants rated the intensity of their perceived effort. Corticospinal and intracortical excitability of the right wrist flexor was assessed at rest and during submaximal contractions. ResultsContralateral heat pain significantly increased perceived effort compared with the control and warm conditions. Contralateral heat pain did not reduce corticospinal or intracortical excitability. Conversely, contralateral heat pain increased corticospinal excitability, reflected primarily in decreased cortical silent period duration. Perceived effort was associated with the subjective experience of pain rather than with TMS-derived variables. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that increased effort during contralateral heat pain cannot be attributed to inhibition of the primary motor cortex or the corticospinal pathway. The higher perceived effort in the presence of contralateral heat pain likely reflects the cognitive cost of pain rather than alterations in the transmission of the motor command.

neuroscience↗

Motor cortical circuits are uniquely impacted by different exercise intensities

Acute aerobic exercise (AEX) can enhance motor learning and promote neuroplasticity. However, the effect of AEX intensity on primary motor cortex (M1) excitability has not been systematically examined. Hence, the dose-response relationship between AEX intensity and M1 excitability modulation remains unclear. This study investigated the impact of AEX intensity on distinct M1 circuits using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Thirty right-handed adults underwent four experimental sessions: rest (control), light (LIIT), moderate (MIIT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) AEX. AEX intensity was prescribed with the heart rate reserve (HRR) method, and the interval cycling sessions consisted of alternating between 3 min at the target intensity (LIIT: 35% HRR; MIIT: 55% HRR; HIIT: 80% HRR) and 2 min of active recovery (25% HRR) for 20 min total. We performed TMS measures before (Pre), immediately post (Post0), and 20 min post (Post20) AEX/rest to assess modulation of corticospinal excitability and GABAergic inhibition as measured by short interval-intracortical inhibition (SICI). This study found that: (1) HIIT and MIIT increased corticospinal excitability, with HIIT eliciting a sustained increase; and (2) all AEX intensities (LIIT, MIIT and HIIT) decreased SICI, with the greatest sustained reduction following MIIT. Also, there was a greater reduction in GABAergic inhibition when measured with anterior-posterior than posterior-anterior TMS current following MIIT. Collectively, our results demonstrate the impact of HIIT and MIIT to enhance corticospinal excitability and reduce GABAergic inhibition in M1. This study provides evidence for a dose-response effect of AEX intensity on the modulation of distinct motor cortical circuits. KEY POINTS SUMMARYO_LIAcute aerobic exercise (AEX) is known to modulate primary motor cortex (M1) excitability, but the effect of AEX intensity is unclear. C_LIO_LIThis study examined the impact of light-, moderate-, and high-intensity interval training (LIIT, MIIT, HIIT) AEX and rest (non-AEX, control) on distinct M1 cortical circuits using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). C_LIO_LIHIIT induced a sustained increase in M1 output excitability, MIIT induced a transient increase, and LIIT showed no effect. C_LIO_LIAll exercise intensities (LIIT, MIIT and HIIT) decreased GABAergic inhibition, as measured by short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), with MIIT showing a sustained decrease. C_LIO_LISICI measured with an anterior-to-posterior TMS current demonstrated greater GABAergic disinhibition compared to posterior-to-anterior TMS current following MIIT. C_LIO_LIThis study demonstrates a nuanced dose-response impact of AEX intensity on distinct M1 cortical circuits. C_LI

neuroscience↗