Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Negus, S. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Negus, S. S..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Quantitative Economon Model of Transactions for Drugs and Other Commodities

BackgroundAn economon is a dyadic economic unit of two participants who exchange mutually reinforcing commodities (e.g., addictive drugs for money). A human economon often consists of a buyer providing money to a supplier, while the supplier reciprocally provides some commodity to the buyer. Here, we develop the Quantitative Economon Model (QEM) by reviewing basic principles of behavioral economics and translating those principles into a quantitative model characterizing transactional behavior between buyers and suppliers that would be applicable to transactions involving drugs specifically, as well as other commodities. According to the model, transactions between a buyer and supplier depend on their respective economic demand for the commodities exchanged. Additionally, the model assumes that demand for commodities fluctuates across sequential transactions due to satiation and deprivation associated with consumption of those commodities, of particular relevance to addictive drugs. MethodsWe used a computational approach to simulate data from the QEM according to four conditions representing parametric manipulations of high or low levels of deprivation crossed with high or low levels of satiation (i.e., a 2x2 matrix of conditions). ResultsSimulations revealed patterns of transactional behavior that may be characteristic of a range of commodities. In particular, when deprivation-effects were high and satiation-effects were low, simulated transaction rates were characteristic of the high consumption rates observed with addictive drugs. In other conditions, transaction rates varied along patterns characteristic of consumption for other commodities like food. In sum, the QEM provides a framework for modeling, investigating, and predicting patterns of human transactional behavior.

bioinformatics↗

Effects of environmental manipulations on cocaine-vs-social choice in male and female rats

Cocaine use disorder occurs in an environment where cocaine and other nondrug commodities are concurrently available. Preclinical drug-vs-nondrug choice procedures are one simplified method of modeling this complex clinical environment. The present study established a discrete-trial progressive-ratio (PR) cocaine-vs-social interaction choice procedure in male and female rats and determined sensitivity of choice behavior to manipulations of reinforcer magnitude and non-contingent "sample" reinforcer presentation. Rats could make up to nine discrete choices between an intravenous cocaine infusion (0.1 - 1.0 mg/kg/inf) and social interaction with a same-sex social "Partner" rat. Cocaine infusions were available under a PR schedule of reinforcement, and social interaction was available under a fixed-ratio (FR) 3 schedule. Social interaction was chosen over no or small cocaine doses (saline, 0.01 mg/kg/inf) and behavior was reallocated away from social and towards cocaine at larger cocaine doses (1.0 mg/kg/inf). Manipulating social interaction time as one method to alter social reinforcer magnitude did not significantly alter cocaine-vs-social choice. Removing the non-contingent reinforcer presentations before the discrete choice trials also failed to affect cocaine-vs-social choice, suggesting the time interval was sufficient to minimize any potential influence of the non-contingent cocaine infusions on subsequent choice behavior. Overall, the present results were consistent with previous drug-vs-social choice studies and extend our knowledge of environmental factors impacting drug-vs-social choice. Future studies determining the pharmacological sensitivity of cocaine-vs-social choice will be important in expanding the preclinical utility of these procedures for candidate medication drug development.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Lack of effect of different pain-related manipulations on opioid self-administration, reinstatement of opioid seeking, and opioid choice in rats

Rationale and Objective: Pain-related factors increase risk for opioid addiction, and opioid-induced pain relief may function as a negative reinforcer to increase opioid taking and seeking. However, experimental pain-related manipulations generally do not increase opioid self-administration in rodents. This discrepancy may reflect insufficient learning of pain-relief contingencies or confounding effects of pain-related behavioral impairments. Here we determined if pairing noxious stimuli with opioid self-administration would promote pain-related reinstatement of opioid seeking or increase opioid choice over food. Methods: In Experiment 1, rats self-administered fentanyl in the presence or absence of repeated intraplantar capsaicin injections in distinct contexts to model context-specific exposure to cutaneous nociception. After capsaicin-free extinction in both contexts, we tested if capsaicin would reinstate fentanyl seeking. In Experiment 2, rats self-administered heroin after intraperitoneal (i.p.) lactic acid injections to model acute visceral inflammatory pain. After lactic acid-free extinction, we tested if lactic acid would reinstate heroin seeking. In Experiment 3, we tested if repeated i.p. lactic acid or intraplantar Complete Freund Adjuvant (CFA; to model sustained inflammatory pain) would increase fentanyl choice over food. Results: In Experiments 1-2, neither capsaicin nor lactic acid reinstated opioid seeking after extinction, and lactic acid did not increase heroin-induced reinstatement. In Experiment 3, lactic acid and CFA decreased reinforcement rate without affecting fentanyl choice. Conclusions: Results extend the range of conditions across which pain-related manipulations fail to increase opioid seeking in rats and suggest that enhanced opioid-addiction risk in humans with chronic pain involves factors other than enhanced opioid reinforcement and relapse.

neuroscience↗

Extinguishing cocaine-associated discriminative stimuli attenuates cocaine vs food choice in male rhesus monkeys

Relapse within the context of a substance use disorder can be triggered by cues that function as discriminative stimuli to signal contingencies of drug availability and promote drug-taking behavior. Extinction procedures can weaken this association between drug-associated cues and drug-taking behavior and may reduce the probability of relapse. This study evaluated a regimen of extinction training on cocaine and heroin self-administration in rhesus monkeys under a drug-vs.-food choice procedure. Behavior was initially maintained under a concurrent schedule of food (1-g food pellets; fixed-ratio 100 schedule) and cocaine injections (0-0.1 mg/kg/injection; fixed-ratio 10) (n=4 males) or heroin injections (0-0.01 mg/kg/injection; fixed-ratio 10) (n=3 females and 1 male) during daily 2-h choice sessions. Subsequently, choice sessions were supplemented by daily 20-h extinction sessions for 14 consecutive days. During extinction sessions, drug-associated discriminative stimuli were presented, but responding produced saline injections. Drug continued to be available during choice sessions. Prior to extinction, both cocaine- and heroin-maintained dose-dependent increases in drug-vs.-food choice. Exposure to 14 extinction sessions failed to significantly decrease drug choice and increase food choice. These preclinical results do not support the effectiveness of extinguishing drug-associated discriminative stimuli as a non-pharmacological treatment strategy for reducing drug choice.

neuroscience↗

Effects of Repeated Treatment with Monoamine-Transporter-Inhibitor Antidepressants on Pain-Related Depression of Intracranial Self-Stimulation in Rats

Synaptic neurotransmission with dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) is terminated primarily by reuptake into the presynaptic terminal via the DA, NE, and 5-HT transporters (DAT/NET/SERT, respectively). Monoamine transporter inhibitors constitute one class of drugs used to treat pain, and emergence of analgesic effects by these compounds often requires repeated treatment for days or weeks. The present study compared antinociceptive effects produced by repeated treatment with monoamine transporter inhibitors in a preclinical assay of pain-related depression of positively reinforced operant responding. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats equipped with microelectrodes targeting a brain-reward area responded for pulses of electrical brain stimulation in an intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) procedure. Intraperitoneal injection of dilute lactic acid served as a noxious stimulus that repeatedly depressed ICSS and also produced weight loss during 7 days of repeated acid administration. Both acid-induced ICSS depression and weight loss were blocked by repeated pretreatment with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ketorolac (a positive control) but not by the kappa opioid receptor agonist U69,593 (a negative control). Like ketorolac, the DAT/NET inhibitor bupropion fully blocked acid-induced ICSS depression and weight loss throughout all 7 days of treatment. Conversely, the NET-selective inhibitor nortriptyline and SERT-selective inhibitor citalopram produced antinociception only after several days of repeated treatment, and weight loss was attenuated by citalopram but not by nortriptyline. These results support effectiveness of bupropion to alleviate signs of pain-related behavioral depression in rats and further suggest that nortriptyline and citalopram produce a more gradual onset of antinociception during repeated treatment.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Attenuated Dopamine Receptor Signaling in Nucleus Accumbens Core in a Rat Model of Chemically-Induced Neuropathy

Neuropathy is major source of chronic pain that can be caused by mechanically or chemically induced nerve injury. Previous work in a rat model of neuropathic pain demonstrated that bilateral formalin injection into the hind paws produced mechanical hypersensitivity (allodynia) and depressed responding for intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). To determine whether neuropathy alters dopamine receptor responsiveness in mesolimbic brain regions, we examined dopamine D1-like and D2-like receptor (D1/2R) signaling and expression in male rats 14 days after bilateral intraplantar formalin injections into both rear paws. D2R-mediated G-protein activation and expression of the D2R long, but not short, isoform were reduced in nucleus accumbens (NAc) core, but not in NAc shell, caudate-putamen (CPu) or ventral tegmental area (VTA) of formalin-compared to saline-treated rats. In addition, D1R-stimulated adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity was also reduced in NAc core, but not in NAc shell or prefrontal cortex, of formalin-treated rats, whereas D1R expression was unaffected. Expression of other proteins involved in dopamine neurotransmission, including dopamine uptake transporter (DAT) and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), were unaffected by formalin treatment. In behavioral tests, the effects of D2R agonists on ICSS were attenuated in formalin-treated rats, whereas the effects of D1R agonists were unchanged. These results indicate that intraplantar formalin as a model of chemically induced neuropathy produces attenuation of highly specific DA receptor signaling processes in NAc core of male rats.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Comparison of Chemotherapy Effects on Mechanical Sensitivity and Food-Maintained Operant Responding in Male and Female Rats

ObjectiveChemotherapies of varying classes often cause neuropathy and debilitating chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP) sufficient to limit treatment and reduce quality of life for many patients battling cancer. There are currently no effective preventative or alleviative treatments for CINP. Preclinical models have been developed to test candidate CINP treatments; however, studies using these models rarely provide direct comparisons of effects of different chemotherapies or assess the degree to which chemotherapies produce clinically relevant signs of pain-depressed behavior.\n\nMethodsMale and female Sprague-Dawley rats received four injections of vehicle, paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, vincristine, or bortezomib on alternate days. Mechanical hypersensitivity, body weight, and food-maintained operant responding were evaluated before, during, and for up to 42 days after initiation of treatment. Morphine potency and effectiveness to reverse chemotherapy-induced effects were also evaluated.\n\nResultsAll four chemotherapies produced dose-dependent and sustained mechanical hypersensitivity in all rats. Vincristine and oxaliplatin produced transient weight loss and decreases in food-maintained operant responding in all rats, whereas paclitaxel and bortezomib produced lesser or no effect. At four weeks after treatment, operant responding was depressed only in paclitaxel-treated males. Morphine reversed mechanical hypersensitivity in all rats but failed to reverse paclitaxel-induced depression of operant responding in males.\n\nConclusionsChemotherapy treatments sufficient to produce sustained mechanical hypersensitivity failed to produce sustained or morphine-reversible behavioral depression in rats. Insofar as pain-related behavioral depression is a cardinal sign of CINP in humans, these results challenge the presumption that these chemotherapy-dosing regimens are sufficient to model clinically relevant CINP in rats.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Lorcaserin maintenance fails to attenuate heroin vs food choice in rhesus monkeys

BackgroundThe current opioid crisis has reinvigorated preclinical research in the evaluation of non-opioid candidate treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). Emerging evidence suggests 5-HT2C receptor agonists may attenuate the abuse-related effects of opioids. This study evaluated effectiveness of 7-day treatment with the clinically available 5-HT2C agonist lorcaserin on heroin-vs.-food choice in rhesus monkeys. Lorcaserin effects were compared to effects produced by saline substitution and by 7-day treatment with the opioid antagonist naltrexone.\n\nMethodsAdult male (1) and female (6) rhesus monkeys were trained to respond under a concurrent schedule of food delivery (1g pellets, fixed-ratio 100 schedule) and intravenous heroin injections (0-0.032 mg/kg/injection, fixed-ratio 10 schedule) during daily 2h sessions. Heroin choice dose-effect functions were determined daily before and following 7-day saline substitution or 7-day continuous treatment with naltrexone (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h, IV) or lorcaserin (0.032-0.32 mg/kg/h, IV).\n\nResultsUnder baseline conditions, increasing heroin doses maintained a dose-dependent increase in heroin choice. Both saline substitution and 7-day naltrexone treatment significantly attenuated heroin choice and produced a reciprocal increase in food choice. Continuous lorcaserin treatment significantly increased heroin choice.\n\nConclusionsIn contrast to saline substitution and naltrexone, lorcaserin treatment was ineffective to reduce heroin-vs.-food choice. These preclinical results do not support the therapeutic potential of lorcaserin as a candidate OUD treatment.

neuroscience↗

Effectiveness and selectivity of a heroin conjugate vaccine to attenuate heroin, 6-acetylmorphine, and morphine antinociception in rats: Comparison with naltrexone

BackgroundOne emerging strategy to address the opioid crisis includes opioid-targeted immunopharmacotherapies. This study compared effectiveness of a heroin-tetanus toxoid (TT) conjugate vaccine to antagonize heroin, 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM), morphine, and fentanyl antinociception in rats.\n\nMethodsAdult male and female Sprague Dawley rats received three doses of active or control vaccine at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Vaccine pharmacological selectivity was assessed by comparing opioid dose-effect curves in 50{degrees}C warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure before and after active or control heroin-TT vaccine. Route of administration [subcutaneous (SC) vs. intravenous [IV)] was also examined as a determinant of vaccine effectiveness. Continuous naltrexone treatment (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h) effects on heroin, 6-AM, and morphine antinociceptive potency was also determined as a benchmark for minimal vaccine effectiveness.\n\nResultsThe heroin-TT vaccine decreased potency of SC heroin (5-fold), IV heroin (3-fold), and IV 6-AM (3-fold) for several weeks without affecting IV morphine or SC and IV fentanyl potency. The control vaccine did not alter potency of any opioid. Naltrexone dose-dependently decreased antinociceptive potency of SC heroin, and treatment with 0.01 mg/kg/h naltrexone produced similar, approximate 8-fold decreases in potencies of SC and IV heroin, IV 6-AM, and IV morphine. The combination of naltrexone and active vaccine was more effective than naltrexone alone to antagonize SC heroin but not IV heroin.\n\nConclusionsThe heroin-TT vaccine formulation examined is less effective, but more selective, than chronic naltrexone to attenuate heroin antinociception in rats. Furthermore, these results provide an empirical framework for future preclinical opioid vaccine research to benchmark effectiveness against naltrexone.

pharmacology and toxicology↗