Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nayeem, M. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Nayeem, M. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

CRISMER: A transformer-based Interpretable Deep Learning Approach for Genome-wide CRISPR Cas-9 Off-Target Prediction and Optimization

CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing holds transformative promise for genetic therapies, but is hindered by off-target effects that undermine its precision and safety. To address this, we developed CRISMER, a hybrid deep-learning architecture that uses multi-branch convolutional neural networks to extract k-mer features and transformer blocks to capture long-range dependencies. This hybrid approach enhances the prediction and optimization of single-guide RNA (sgRNA) designs. CRISMER was trained on Change-seq and Site-seq datasets, using a 20 x 16 sparse one-hot encoding scheme, and evaluated on independent datasets including Circle-seq, Guide-seq, Surro-seq, and TTISS. CRISMER outperformed existing tools, achieving an F1 score of 0.728 and a PR-AUC of 0.818 on the CRISPR-DIPOFF dataset, and it generalized to fully independent datasets and to off-targets containing insertions and deletions. Ablation experiments confirmed that each architectural component contributes to performance, and CRISMER attained these results with substantially fewer parameters than transformer-and foundation-model baselines. It also demonstrated strong in silico specificity prediction and optimization capabilities, identifying sgRNA variants for targets such as PCSK9, BCL11A, and EXM1 with improved predicted off-target profiles. Interpretability analysis via integrated gradients confirmed the models focus on critical PAM-proximal regions and mismatch patterns. These results demonstrate that CRISMER significantly improves the accuracy and safety of CRISPR-Cas9, advancing its reliability for therapeutic applications.

bioinformatics↗

Multi-objective formulation of MSA for phylogeny estimation (Do phylogeny-aware measures guide towards better phylogenetic tree?)

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a basic step in many analyses in computational biology, including predicting the structure and function of proteins, orthology prediction and estimating phylogenies. The objective of MSA is to infer the homology among the sequences of chosen species. Commonly, the MSAs are inferred by optimizing a single function or objective. The alignments estimated under one criterion may be different to the alignments generated by other criteria, inferring discordant homologies and thus leading to different evolutionary histories relating the sequences. In recent past, researchers have advocated for the multi-objective formulation of MSA, to address this issue, where multiple conflicting objective functions are being optimized simultaneously to generate a set of alignments. However, no theoretical or empirical justification with respect to a real-life application has been shown for a particular multi-objective formulation. In this study, we investigate the impact of multi-objective formulation in the context of phylogenetic tree estimation. Employing multi-objective metaheuristics, we demonstrate that trees estimated on the alignments generated by multi-objective formulation are substantially better than the trees estimated by the state-of-the-art MSA tools, including PASTA, MUSCLE, CLUSTAL, MAFFT etc. We also demonstrate that highly accurate alignments with respect to popular measures like sum-of-pair (SP) score and total-column (TC) score do not necessarily lead to highly accurate phylogenetic trees. Thus in essence we ask the question whether a phylogeny-aware metric can guide us in choosing appropriate multi-objective formulations that can result in better phylogeny estimation. And we answer the question affirmatively through carefully designed extensive empirical study. As a by-product we also suggest a methodology for primary selection of a set of objective functions for a multi-objective formulation based on the association with the resulting phylogenetic tree.

bioinformatics↗