Biology subjects

Natoli, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Natoli, T..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

The Carcinogenome Project: In-vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity

Background: Most chemicals in commerce have not been evaluated for their carcinogenic potential. The current de-facto gold-standard approach to carcinogen testing adopts the two-year rodent bioassay, a time consuming and costly procedure. Alternative approaches, such as high-throughput in-vitro assays, show promise in addressing the limitations in carcinogen screening.\n\nObjectives: We developed a screening process for predicting chemical carcinogenicity and genotoxicity and characterizing modes of actions (MoAs) using in-vitro gene expression assays.\n\nMethods: We generated a large toxicogenomics resource comprising ~6,000 expression profiles corresponding to 330 chemicals profiled in HepG2 cells at multiple doses and in replicates. Predictive models of carcinogenicity were built using a Random Forest classifier. Differential pathway enrichment analysis was performed to identify pathways associated with carcinogen exposure. Signatures of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity were compared with external data sources including Drugmatrix and the Connectivity Map.\n\nResults: Among profiles with sufficient bioactivity, our classifiers achieved 72.2% AUC for predicting carcinogenicity and 82.3% AUC for predicting genotoxicity. Our analysis showed that chemical bioactivity, as measured by the strength and reproducibility of the transcriptional response, is not significantly associated with long-term carcinogenicity, as evidenced by the many carcinogenic chemicals that did not elicit substantial changes in gene expression at doses up to 40 M. However, sufficiently high transcriptional bioactivity is necessary for a chemical to be used for prediction of carcinogenicity. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed several pathways consistent with literature review of pathways that drive cancer, including DNA damage and DNA repair. These data are available for download via https://clue.io/CRCGN_ABC, and a web portal for interactive query and visualization of the data and results is accessible at https://carcinogenome.org.\n\nConclusions: We demonstrated a short-term in-vitro screening approach using gene expression profiling to predict long-term carcinogenicity and infer MoAs of chemical perturbations.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Open Community Challenge Reveals Molecular Network Modules with Key Roles in Diseases

Identification of modules in molecular networks is at the core of many current analysis methods in biomedical research. However, how well different approaches identify disease-relevant modules in different types of gene and protein networks remains poorly understood. We launched the "Disease Module Identification DREAM Challenge", an open competition to comprehensively assess module identification methods across diverse protein-protein interaction, signaling, gene co-expression, homology, and cancer-gene networks. Predicted network modules were tested for association with complex traits and diseases using a unique collection of 180 genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Our critical assessment of 75 contributed module identification methods reveals novel top-performing algorithms, which recover complementary trait-associated modules. We find that most of these modules correspond to core disease-relevant pathways, which often comprise therapeutic targets and correctly prioritize candidate disease genes. This community challenge establishes benchmarks, tools and guidelines for molecular network analysis to study human disease biology (https://synapse.org/modulechallenge).

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

A unified web platform for network-based analyses of genomic data

Functional genomics networks are widely used to identify unexpected pathway relationships in large genomic datasets. However, it is challenging to quantitatively compare the signal-to-noise ratio of different networks, the biology they describe, and to identify the optimal network to interpret a particular genetic dataset. Via GeNets users can train a machine-learning model (Quack) to make such comparisons; and they can execute, store, and share analyses of genetic and RNA sequencing datasets.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

Evaluation of RNAi and CRISPR technologies by large-scale gene expression profiling in the Connectivity Map

The application of RNA interference (RNAi) to mammalian cells has provided the means to perform phenotypic screens to determine the functions of genes. Although RNAi has revolutionized loss of function genetic experiments, it has been difficult to systematically assess the prevalence and consequences of off-target effects. The Connectivity Map (CMAP) represents an unprecedented resource to study the gene expression consequences of expressing short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs). Analysis of signatures for over 13,000 shRNAs applied in 9 cell lines revealed that miRNA-like off-target effects of RNAi are far stronger and more pervasive than generally appreciated. We show that mitigating off-target effects is feasible in these datasets via computational methodologies to produce a Consensus Gene Signature (CGS). In addition, we compared RNAi technology to clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-based knockout by analysis of 373 sgRNAs in 6 cells lines, and show that the on-target efficacies are comparable, but CRISPR technology is far less susceptible to systematic off-target effects. These results will help guide the proper use and analysis of loss-of-function reagents for the determination of gene function.

bioinformatics↗