Choice of 3D morphometric method leads to diverging interpretations of form--function relationships in the carnivoran calcaneus
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThree dimensional morphometric methods are a powerful tool for comparative analysis of shape. However, morphological shape is often represented using landmarks selected by the user to describe features of perceived importance, and this may lead to over confident prediction of form-function relationships in subsequent analyses. We used Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) of 13 homologous 3D landmarks and spherical harmonics (SPHARM) analysis, a homology-free method that describes the entire shape of a closed surface, to quantify the shape of the calcaneus, a landmark poor structure that is important in hind-limb mechanics, for 111 carnivoran species spanning 12 of 13 terrestrial families. Both approaches document qualitatively similar patterns of shape variation, including a dominant continuum from short/stout to long/narrow calcanea. However, while phylogenetic generalized linear models indicate that locomotor mode best explains shape from the GPA, the same analyses find that shape described by SPHARM is best predicted by foot posture and body mass without a role for locomotor mode, though effect sizes for all are small. User choices regarding morphometric methods can dramatically impact macroevolutionary interpretations of shape change in a single structure, an outcome that is likely exacerbated when readily landmarkable features are few.