Biology subjects

Nasa, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Nasa, I..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Interaction of IRS2 with PLK1 protects cells from mitotic stress

In this study we identify a role for IRS2 in the protection of cells from mitotic stress through its interaction with PLK1. IRS2 is an adaptor protein for the insulin and IGF-1 receptors that mediates their signaling functions. In this capacity, IRS2 is tyrosine phosphorylated to recruit signaling effectors that control cellular outcomes. A role for IRS2 in mitotic regulation has been reported, but the mechanism of IRS2 action in this regulation has not been determined. Here we report that IRS2 interacts with PLK1 in a CDK1-dependent manner, and they co-localize at centrosomes in mitotic cells. In response to mitotic stress, cells that lack IRS2 or express a PLK1-binding deficient mutant exhibit reduced centrosome separation and a shortened mitotic arrest that leads to reduced tumor cell viability. In contrast, cells expressing an IRS2 mutant that is not tyrosine phosphorylated display normal mitotic function. Together, our findings establish a mechanistic connection between IRS2 and mitotic regulation that is distinct from its function as a signaling adaptor protein.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2024

An atlas of RNA-dependent proteins in cell division reveals the riboregulation of mitotic protein-protein interactions

Ribonucleoprotein complexes are dynamic assemblies of RNA with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which can modulate the fate of the RNA molecules from transcription to degradation. Vice versa, RNA can regulate the interactions and functions of the associated proteins. Dysregulation of RBPs is linked to diseases such as cancer and neurological disorders. RNA and RBPs are present in mitotic structures like the centrosomes and spindle microtubules, but their influence on mitotic spindle integrity remains unknown. Thus, we applied the R-DeeP strategy for the proteome-wide identification of RNA-dependent proteins and complexes to cells synchronized in mitosis versus interphase. The resulting atlas of RNA-dependent proteins in cell division can be accessed through the R-DeeP 3.0 database (R-DeeP3.dkfz.de). It revealed key mitotic factors as RNA-dependent such as AURKA, KIFC1 and TPX2 that were linked to RNA despite their lack of canonical RNA-binding domains. KIFC1 was identified as a new interaction partner and phosphorylation substrate of AURKA at S349 and T359. In addition, KIFC1 interacted with both, AURKA and TPX2, in an RNA-dependent manner. Our data suggest a riboregulation of mitotic protein-protein interactions during spindle assembly, offering new perspectives on the control of cell division processes by RNA-protein complexes. HighlightsO_LIDifferential R-DeeP screens in mitosis and interphase are provided as a resource in a user-friendly database at R-DeeP3.dkfz.de C_LIO_LIAn atlas of RNA-dependent proteins in cell division identifies a substantial number of unconventional RNA-binding proteins among mitotic factors C_LIO_LIInvestigation of protein-protein interactions reveals KIFC1 as a new AURKA and TPX2 interaction partner during spindle assembly C_LIO_LIKIFC1, AURKA and TPX2 interact with each other in an RNA-dependent manner and directly bind to RNA C_LIO_LIAURKA phosphorylates KIFC1 at residues S349 and T359 C_LI

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Global substrate identification and high throughput in vitro dephosphorylation reactions uncover PP1 and PP2A-B55 specificity principles

Phosphoprotein phosphatases (PPPs) dephosphorylate Serine (Ser)/Threonine (Thr) residues to regulate major signaling pathways and cellular transitions. Despite the central role of PPPs the substrates in most cellular processes and the determinants of phosphatase specificity are poorly understood. This is because methods to investigate this at scale are lacking. Here we develop a novel in vitro assay, MRBLE:Dephos, that allows multiplexing of dephosphorylation reactions to determine phosphatase preferences. Using MRBLE:Dephos, we establish amino acid preferences of the residues surrounding the dephosphorylation site for PP1 and PP2A- B55, which reveals common and unique preferences for the two phosphatases. To compare the MRBLE:Dephos results to cellular substrates, we focused on mitotic exit that requires extensive dephosphorylation by PP1 and PP2A-B55. We use specific inhibition of PP1 and PP2A-B55 in mitotic exit lysates coupled with quantitative phosphoproteomics to identify more than 2000 regulated phosphorylation sites. Importantly, the sites dephosphorylated during mitotic exit reveal key signatures that are consistent with the MRBLE:Dephos results. We use these insights to specifically alter INCENP dephosphorylation kinetics at mitotic exit, resulting in defective cytokinesis thus underscoring the biological relevance of our determined specificity principles. Finally, we provide a comprehensive characterization of PP1 binding motifs and demostrate how binding of phosphatases to substrates shapes dephosphorylation specificity. Collectively, we develop novel approaches to advance our ability to investigate protein phosphatases and use these to provide a framework for understanding mitotic exit regulation by dephosphorylation.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Inducible protein degradation as a strategy to identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatase 6 substrates in RAS-mutant colorectal cancer cells

Protein phosphorylation is an essential regulatory mechanism that controls most cellular processes, including cell cycle progression, cell division, and response to extracellular stimuli, among many others, and is deregulated in many diseases. Protein phosphorylation is coordinated by the opposing activities of protein kinases and protein phosphatases. In eukaryotic cells, most serine/threonine phosphorylation sites are dephosphorylated by members of the Phosphoprotein Phosphatase (PPP) family. However, we only know for a few phosphorylation sites which specific PPP dephosphorylates them. Although natural compounds such as calyculin A and okadaic acid inhibit PPPs at low nanomolar concentrations, no selective chemical PPP inhibitors exist. Here, we demonstrate the utility of endogenous tagging of genomic loci with an auxin-inducible degron (AID) as a strategy to investigate specific PPP signaling. Using Protein Phosphatase 6 (PP6) as an example, we demonstrate how rapidly inducible protein degradation can be employed to identify dephosphorylation SITES and elucidate PP6 biology. Using genome editing, we introduce AID-tags into each allele of the PP6 catalytic subunit (PP6c) in DLD-1 cells expressing the auxin receptor Tir1. Upon rapid auxin-induced degradation of PP6c, we perform quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics and phosphoproteomics to identify PP6 substrates in mitosis. PP6 is an essential enzyme with conserved roles in mitosis and growth signaling. Consistently, we identify candidate PP6c-dependent phosphorylation sites on proteins implicated in coordinating the mitotic cell cycle, cytoskeleton, gene expression, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and Hippo signaling. Finally, we demonstrate that PP6c opposes the activation of large tumor suppressor 1 (LATS1) by dephosphorylating Threonine 35 (T35) on Mps One Binder (MOB1), thereby blocking the interaction of MOB1 and LATS1. Our analyses highlight the utility of combining genome engineering, inducible degradation, and multiplexed phosphoproteomics to investigate signaling by individual PPPs on a global level, which is currently limited by the lack of tools for specific interrogation.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2021

A complex of BRCA2 and PP2A-B56 is required for DNA repair by homologous recombination

Mutations in the tumour suppressor gene BRCA2 are associated with predisposition to breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA2 has a central role in maintaining genome integrity by facilitating the repair of toxic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination (HR). BRCA2 acts by promoting RAD51 nucleoprotein filament formation on resected single-stranded DNA, but how BRCA2 activity is regulated during HR is not fully understood. Here, we delineate a pathway where ATM and ATR kinases phosphorylate a highly conserved region in BRCA2 in response to DSBs. These phosphorylations stimulate the binding of the protein phosphatase PP2A-B56 to BRCA2 through a conserved binding motif. We show that the phosphorylation-dependent formation of the BRCA2-PP2A-B56 complex is required for efficient RAD51 loading to sites of DNA damage and HR-mediated DNA repair. Moreover, we find that several cancer-associated mutations in BRCA2 deregulate the BRCA2-PP2A-B56 interaction and sensitize cells to PARP inhibition. Collectively, our work uncovers PP2A-B56 as a positive regulator of BRCA2 function in HR with clinical implications for BRCA2 and PP2A-B56 mutated cancers.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2020

A highly conserved binding pocket on PP2A-B56 is required for shugoshin binding and cohesion protection

The shugoshin proteins are universal protectors of centromeric cohesin during mitosis and meiosis. The binding of human Sgo1 to the PP2A-B56 phosphatase through a coiled coil (CC) region is believed to mediate cohesion protection during mitosis. Here we undertook a structure function analysis of the PP2A-B56-Sgo1 complex, revealing unanticipated aspects of complex formation and function. We establish that a highly conserved pocket of the B56 regulatory subunit is required for Sgo1 binding and cohesion protection. Consistent with this, we show that Sgo1 blocks the binding of PP2A-B56 substrates containing a canonical B56 binding motif. Surprisingly, we identify B56 and Sgo1 mutants that prevent complex formation yet support cohesion protection and normal mitotic progression. This suggests that Sgo1 and PP2A-B56 have cohesion protection activity independently of complex formation. Collectively our work provides important insight into cohesion protection during mitosis.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Coupling of Cdc20 inhibition and activation by BubR1

Tight regulation of the APC/C-Cdc20 ubiquitin ligase that targets Cyclin B1 for degradation is important for mitotic fidelity. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) inhibits Cdc20 through the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). In addition, phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Cyclin B1-Cdk1 independently inhibits APC/C-Cdc20 activation. This creates a conundrum for how Cdc20 gets activated prior to Cyclin B1 degradation. Here we show that the MCC component BubR1 harbours both Cdc20 inhibition and activation activities, allowing for cross-talk between the two Cdc20 inhibition pathways. Specifically BubR1 acts as a substrate specifier for PP2A-B56 to enable efficient Cdc20 dephosphorylation in the MCC. A mutant Cdc20 mimicking the dephosphorylated state escapes a mitotic checkpoint arrest arguing that restricting Cdc20 dephosphorylation to the MCC is important. Collectively our work reveals how Cdc20 can be dephosphorylated in the presence of Cyclin B1-Cdk1 activity without causing premature anaphase onset.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2019

A mechanism for how Cdr1/Nim1 kinase promotes mitotic entry by inhibiting Wee1

To enter into mitosis, cells must shut off the cell cycle inhibitor Wee1. SAD family protein kinases regulate Wee1 signaling in yeast and humans. In S. pombe, two SAD kinases (Cdr1/Nim1 and Cdr2) act as upstream inhibitors of Wee1. Previous studies found that S. pombe Cdr1/Nim1 directly phosphorylates and inhibits Wee1 in vitro, but different results were obtained for budding yeast and human SAD kinases. Without a full understanding of Cdr1 action on Wee1, it has been difficult to assess the in vivo relevance and conservation of this mechanism. Here, we show that both Cdr1 and Cdr2 promote Wee1 phosphorylation in cells, but only Cdr1 inhibits Wee1 kinase activity. Inhibition occurs when Cdr1 phosphorylates a cluster of serine residues linking -helices G and H of the Wee1 kinase domain. This region is highly divergent among different Wee1 proteins, consistent with distinct regulatory mechanisms. A wee(4A) mutant that impairs phosphorylation by Cdr1 delays mitotic entry and causes elongated cells. By disrupting and re-targeting Cdr1 localization, we show that Cdr1 inhibition of Wee1 occurs in cells at cortical nodes formed by Cdr2. Based on our results, we propose a two-step model for inhibition of Wee1 by Cdr1 and Cdr2 at nodes.

cell biology↗