Biology subjects

Namburi, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Namburi, S..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Frequent extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives aggressive tumors

Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) amplification promotes high oncogene copy number, intratumoral genetic heterogeneity, and accelerated tumor evolution1-3, but its frequency and clinical impact are not well understood. Here we show, using computational analysis of whole-genome sequencing data from 1,979 cancer patients, that ecDNA amplification occurs in at least 26% of human cancers, of a wide variety of histological types, but not in whole blood or normal tissue. We demonstrate a highly significant enrichment for oncogenes on amplified ecDNA and that the most common recurrent oncogene amplifications arise on ecDNA. EcDNA amplifications resulted in higher levels of oncogene transcription compared to copy number matched linear DNA, coupled with enhanced chromatin accessibility. Patients whose tumors have ecDNA-based oncogene amplification showed increase of cell proliferation signature activity, greater likelihood of lymph node spread at initial diagnosis, and significantly shorter survival, even when controlled for tissue type, than do patients whose cancers are not driven by ecDNA-based oncogene amplification. The results presented here demonstrate that ecDNA-based oncogene amplification plays a central role in driving the poor outcome for patients with some of the most aggressive forms of cancers.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Pan-cancer classifications of tumor histological images using deep learning

Histopathological images are a rich but incompletely explored data type for studying cancer. Manual inspection is time consuming, making it challenging to use for image data mining. Here we show that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be systematically applied across cancer types, enabling comparisons to reveal shared spatial behaviors. We develop CNN architectures to analyze 27,815 hematoxylin and eosin slides from The Cancer Genome Atlas for tumor/normal, cancer subtype, and mutation classification. Our CNNs are able to classify tumor/normal status of whole slide images (WSIs) in 19 cancer types with consistently high AUCs (0.995{+/-}0.008), as well as subtypes with lower but significant accuracy (AUC 0.87{+/-}0.1). Remarkably, tumor/normal CNNs trained on one tissue are effective in others (AUC 0.88{+/-}0.11), with classifier relationships also recapitulating known adenocarcinoma, carcinoma, and developmental biology. Moreover, classifier comparisons reveal intra-slide spatial similarities, with average tile-level correlation of 0.45{+/-}0.16 between classifier pairs. Breast cancers, bladder cancers, and uterine cancers have spatial patterns that are particularly easy to detect, suggesting these cancers can be canonical types for image analysis. Patterns for TP53 mutations can also be detected, with WSI self- and cross-tissue AUCs ranging from 0.65-0.80. Finally, we comparatively evaluate CNNs on 170 breast and colon cancer images with pathologist-annotated nuclei, finding that both cellular and intercellular regions contribute to CNN accuracy. These results demonstrate the power of CNNs not only for histopathological classification, but also for cross-comparisons to reveal conserved spatial biology.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

ChIA-PIPE: A fully automated pipeline for ChIA-PET data analysis and visualization

ChIA-PET enables the genome-wide discovery of chromatin interactions involving specific protein factors, with base-pair resolution. Interpreting ChIA-PET data depends on having a robust analytic pipeline. Here, we introduce ChIA-PIPE, a fully automated pipeline for ChIA-PET data processing, quality assessment, analysis, and visualization. ChIA-PIPE performs linker filtering, read mapping, peak calling, loop calling, chromatin-contact-domain calling, and can resolve allele-specific peaks and loops. ChIA-PIPE also automates quality-control assessment for each dataset. Furthermore, ChIA-PIPE generates input files for visualizing 2D contact maps with Juicebox and HiGlass, and provides a new dockerized visualization tool for high-resolution, browser-based exploration of peaks and loops. With minimal adjusting, ChIA-PIPE can also be suited for the analysis of other related chromatin-mapping data.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Pan-cancer machine learning predictors of tissue of origin and molecular subtype

BackgroundIt is estimated by the American Cancer Society that approximately 5% of all metastatic tumors have no defined primary site (tissue) of origin and are classified as cancers of unknown primary (CUPs). The current standard of care for CUP patients depends on immunohistochemistry (IHC) based approaches to identify the primary site. The addition of post-mortem evaluation to IHC based tests helps to reveal the identity of the primary site for only 25% of the CUPs, emphasizing the acute need for better methods of determination of the site of origin. CUP patients are therefore given generic chemotherapeutic agents resulting in poor prognosis. When the tissue of origin is known, patients can be given site specific therapy with significant improvement in clinical outcome. Similarly, identifying the primary site of origin of metastatic cancer is of great importance for designing treatment.\n\nIdentification of the primary site of origin is an import first step but may not be sufficient information for optimal treatment of the patient. Recent studies, primarily from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, and others, have revealed molecular subtypes in several cancer types with distinct clinical outcome. The molecular subtype captures the fundamental mechanisms driving the cancer and provides information that is essential for the optimal treatment of a cancer. Thus, along with primary site of origin, molecular subtype of a tumor is emerging as a criterion for personalized medicine and patient entry into clinical trials.\n\nHowever, there is no comprehensive toolset available for precise identification of tissue of origin or molecular subtype for precision medicine and translational research.\n\nMethods and FindingsWe posited that metastatic tumors will harbor the gene expression profiles of the primary site of origin of the cancer. Therefore, we decided to learn the molecular characteristics of the primary tumors using the large number of cancer genome profiles available from the TCGA project. Our predictors were trained for 33 cancer types and for the 11 cancers where there are established molecular subtypes. We estimated the accuracy of several machine learning models using cross-validation methods. The extensive testing using independent test sets revealed that the predictors had a median sensitivity and specificity of 97.2% and 99.9% respectively without losing classification of any tumor. Subtype classifiers achieved median sensitivity of 87.7% and specificity of 94.5% via cross validation and presented median sensitivity of 79.6% and specificity of 94.6% in two external datasets of 1,999 total samples. Importantly, these external data shows that our classifiers can robustly predict the primary site of origin from external microarray data, metastatic cancer data, and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) data.\n\nConclusionWe have demonstrated the utility of gene expression profiles to solve the important clinical challenge of identifying the primary site of origin and the molecular subtype of cancers based on machine learning algorithms. We show, for the first time to our knowledge, that our pan-cancer classifiers can predict multiple cancers primary site of origin from metastatic samples. The predictors will be made available as open source software, freely available for academic non-commercial use.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Distribution-based measures of tumor heterogeneity are sensitive to mutation calling and lack strong clinical predictive power

Mutant allele frequency distributions in cancer samples have been used to estimate intratumoral heterogeneity and its implications for patient survival. However, mutation calls are sensitive to the calling algorithm. It remains unknown whether the relationship of heterogeneity and clinical outcome is robust to these variations. To resolve this question, we studied the robustness of allele frequency distributions to the mutation callers MuTect, SomaticSniper, and VarScan in 4722 cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We observed discrepancies among the results, particularly a pronounced difference between allele frequency distributions called by VarScan and SomaticSniper. Survival analysis showed little robust predictive power for heterogeneity as measured by Mutant-Allele Tumor Heterogeneity (MATH) score, with the exception of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma. However, we found that variations in mutant allele frequencies were mediated by variations in copy number. Our results indicate that the clinical predictions associated with MATH score are primarily caused by copy number aberrations that alter mutant allele frequencies. Finally, we present a mathematical model of linear tumor evolution demonstrating why MATH score is insufficient for distinguishing different scenarios of tumor growth. Our findings elucidate the importance of allele frequency distributions as a measure for tumor heterogeneity and their prognostic role.

bioinformatics↗