Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Nakata, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Nakata, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Intra-dorsal striatal acetylcholine M1 but not dopaminergic D1 or glutamatergic NMDA receptor antagonists inhibit the consolidation of duration memory in interval timing

The striatal beat frequency (SBF) model assumes that striatal medium spiny neurons encode duration via synaptic plasticity. Muscarinic 1 (M1) cholinergic receptors, as well as dopamine and glutamate receptors, are important for neural plasticity in the dorsal striatum. Therefore, we investigated the effect of inhibiting these receptors on the formation of duration memory. After sufficient training in a Peak interval (PI)-20 s procedure, rats were given a single or mixed infusion of a selective antagonist for the dopamine D1 receptor (SCH23390, 0.5 g per side), the NMDA-type glutamate receptor (D-AP5, 3 g), or the M1 receptor (pirenzepine, 10 g) bilaterally in the dorsal striatum, immediately before starting a PI 40 s session (shift session). On the next day, the rats were tested for new duration memory (40 s) in a session in which no lever presses were reinforced (probe session). In the shift session, performance was tie, irrespective of the drug injected. However, in the probe session, the mean peak time (an index of duration memory) of the M1 + NMDA co-blockade group, but not of the D1 + NMDA co-blockade group, was lower than that of the control group (Exp. 1 and 2). In Exp. 3, the effect of the co-blockade of M1 and NMDA receptors was replicated. Moreover, sole blockade of M1 receptors induced the same effect as M1 and NMDA blockade. These results suggest that in the dorsal striatum, the M1 receptor, but not the D1 or NMDA receptors, are involved in the consolidation of duration memory.

animal behavior and cognition

MCM10 compensates for Myc-induced DNA replication stress in breast cancer stem-like cells

Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are responsible for the drug resistance of tumors and recurrence while they experience DNA replication stress. However, the underlying mechanisms that cause DNA replication stress in CSCs and how they compensate for this stress remain unclear. Here we provide evidence that upregulated c-Myc expression induces stronger DNA replication stress in patient-derived breast CSCs than in differentiated cancer cells. Our results suggest critical roles for mini-chromosome maintenance protein 10 (MCM10), which is a firing (activating) factor of the DNA replication origins, to compensate for the DNA replication stress. Expression levels of MCM10 are upregulated in CSCs and maintained by c-Myc. c-Myc-dependent collisions may take place between RNA transcription and DNA replication machinery in nuclei, thereby causing DNA replication stress. MCM10 may activate dormant replication origins close to the collisions to ensure replication progression. Moreover, patient-derived breast CSCs were dependent on MCM10 for their maintenance even after enrichment for CSCs that were resistant to paclitaxel, the standard chemotherapeutic agent. In addition, MCM10 depletion decreased the growth of cancer cells but not normal cells. Therefore, MCM10 is likely to robustly compensate for DNA replication stress and facilitate genome duplication in the S-phase in cancer cells, which is more pronounced in CSCs. We provide a preclinical rationale to target the c-Myc-MCM10 axis to prevent drug resistance and recurrence.

cancer biology