Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Naaijen, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Naaijen, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Reactive/proactive aggression specific cortical and subcortical alterations in children and adolescents with disruptive behavior

ObjectiveMaladaptive aggression, as present in conduct disorder (CD) and, to a lesser extent, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), has been associated with structural alterations in various brain regions, such as ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala, insula and ventral striatum. Although aggression can be subdivided into reactive and proactive subtypes, no neuroimaging studies have yet investigated if any structural brain alterations are associated with either of the subtypes specifically. Here we investigated this association in predefined regions of interest.\n\nMethodT1-weighted magnetic resonance images were acquired from 158 children and adolescents with aggressive behavior (ODD/CD) and 96 controls in a multi-centre study. Aggression subtypes were assessed by questionnaires. Cortical volume and subcortical volumes and shape were determined using Freesurfer and the FMRIB integrated registration and segmentation tool. Associations between volumes and continuous measures of aggression were established using multilevel linear mixed effects models.\n\nResultsIn cases only proactive aggression was negatively associated with amygdala volume (b=-11.82, p=0.05), while reactive aggression was negatively associated with insula volume (b=-46.41, p=0.01). Classical group comparison showed that children and adolescents with aggressive behavior had smaller volumes than controls in (bilateral) ventral striatum (p=0.003), ACC (p=0.01), and vmPFC (p=0.003) with modest effect sizes.\n\nConclusionsAggression was associated with reduced volume in brain regions involved in decision making. Negative associations were found between reactive aggression and volumes in regions involved in threat responsivity and between proactive aggression and regions linked to empathy. This provides evidence for aggression subtype-specific alterations in brain structure.

neuroscience

Aggression Subtypes Relate to Distinct Resting State Functional Connectivity in Disruptive Children and Adolescents

ObjectiveThere is increasing evidence to suggest altered resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) in adolescents with conduct problems. However, no rsFC studies have addressed the effects of reactive and proactive aggression. Herein, we examined the associations between these aggression subtypes along with subdimensions of callous-unemotional (CU) traits and rsFC using predefined seeds in aggression-related salience network (SN) and default mode network (DMN).\n\nMethodAggression subtype-specific whole-brain rsFC of SN and DMN seeds was investigated in a resting state sequence (mean acquisition time = 8 min 25 sec) acquired from 207 children and adolescents of both sexes aged 8 - 18 years (mean age (SD) = 13.30 (2.60) years; range = 8.02 - 18.35) in a multi-center study. One hundred eighteen individuals exhibited disruptive behavior (conduct disorder/oppositional defiant disorder) with different levels of comorbid ADHD symptoms, 89 were healthy.\n\nResultsCompared to healthy controls, cases demonstrated reduced DMN and - after controlling for ADHD scores - SN seed-based rsFC with left hemispheric frontal clusters. We found increased and distinct aggression-subtype specific rsFC patterns in brain regions linked to processes like emotion, empathy, moral, cognitive control, and decision-making. Specifically, reactive and proactive aggression correlated with distinct SN and DMN seed-based rsFC patterns. CU dimensions led to different DMN and SN rsFC with clusters including frontal, parietal, and cingulate areas, with uncaring-related clusters extended to cerebellar regions.\n\nConclusionsThis first study investigating reactive and proactive aggression along with CU dimensions reveals new subtype-specific whole-brain rsFC patterns, extending the knowledge of neural networks to further distinct forms of disruptive behavior.

neuroscience