Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

N'Diaye, K.

Publications and source records attributed to N'Diaye, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Functional cerebellar connectomes interfacing motor adaptation and reinforcement feedback

Motor adaptation is driven by sensory prediction errors, yet reinforcement feedback can alter the speed and retention of adaptive behaviors. The cerebellum is central in motor adaptation, but posterior lobules, especially Lobule VI (CB6) and Crus I (CBcrus1), also participate in reinforcement-related signaling. Serotoninergic and dopaminergic systems, key modulators of motivational processes, directly influence cerebellar activity. However, how these neuromodulatory systems contribute to cerebellar network organization and to reinforcement-based adaptation in humans remains unclear. We employed a multimodal framework (Receptor-Enriched Analysis of functional Connectivity by Targets; REACT) using PET-derived Serotonin/Dopamine Transporter (SERT/DAT) templates to enrich resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI). We estimated SERT- and DAT-enriched functional connectivity from CB6 and CBcrus1 within motor-adaptation and reinforcement-learning networks, and tested their correlations with performance in a visuomotor adaptation task completed under reward and punishment. Our findings show lobule-specific neuromodulatory organization within the cerebellum. CB6 exhibited predominantly DAT- and SERT-enriched connectivity with motor adaptation networks, while CBcrus1 showed stronger SERT-enriched communication extending to both motor and reinforcement networks. Crucially, distinct cerebello-cortical neuromodulatory networks predicted individual differences in adaptation rate. DAT-enriched CBcrus1 connectivity was linked to punishment-driven adaptation, whereas SERT-enriched cerebello-orbitofrontal connectivity predicted faster adaptation across both reward and punishment contingencies. Furthermore, we observed overlaps between SERT- and DAT-enriched networks in the medial orbitofrontal area for Crus I, which predicted retention following punishment, underscoring the role of convergent neuromodulation in stabilizing adapted movements. We conclude that partially segregated yet convergent cerebello-cortical networks support interactions between motor and motivational behaviors, with combined and opposing effects of serotonergic and dopaminergic neuromodulation accounting for the speed and retention of adaptive behaviors.

neuroscience↗

A cross-species assessment of cognitive flexibility in compulsive disorders

BackgroundCompulsive behaviors, one of the core symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), are defined as repetitive behaviors performed through rigid rituals. The lack of behavioral flexibility has been as being one of the primary causes of compulsions, but studies exploring this dimension have shown inconsistencies in different tasks performed in human and animal models of compulsive behavior. The aim of this study was so to assess the involvement of behavioral flexibility in compulsion, with a similar approach across different species sharing a common symptom of compulsivity.\n\nMethods40 OCD patients, 40 healthy individually matched control subjects, 26 C57BL/6J Sapap3 KO mice and 26 matched wildtype littermates were included in this study. A similar reversal learning task was designed to assess behavioral flexibility in parallel in these two species.\n\nResultsWhen considered as homogeneous groups, OCD patients and KO mice expressing compulsive behaviors did not significantly differ from their controls regarding behavioral flexibility. When clinical subtypes were considered, only patients exhibiting checking compulsions were impaired with more trials needed to reach the reversal criterion. In KO mice, a similarly impaired subgroup was identified. For both species, this impairment did not result in a greater perseveration after reversal, but in a greater lability in their responses in the reversal condition. Moreover, this impairment did not correlate with the severity of compulsive behaviors.\n\nConclusionsIn our cross-species study, we found no consistent link between compulsive behaviors and a lack of behavioral flexibility. However, we showed in both species that the compulsive group was heterogeneous in term of performance in our reversal learning task. Among the compulsive subjects, we identified a subgroup with impaired performance not due to perseverative and rigid behaviors as commonly hypothesized, but rather to an increase in response lability.

neuroscience↗