Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Muths, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Muths, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

QUANTIFYING INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN HOST RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE TO A LETHAL PATHOGEN

Due to the ubiquity of disease in natural systems, hosts have evolved strategies of disease resistance and tolerance to defend themselves from further harm once infected. Resistance strategies directly limit pathogen growth, typically leading to lower infection burdens in the host. A tolerance approach limits the fitness consequences caused by the pathogen but does not directly inhibit pathogen growth. Testing for intraspecific variation in wild host populations is important for informing conservation decisions about captive breeding, translocation, and disease treatment. Here, we test for the relative importance of tolerance and resistance in multiple populations of boreal toads (Anaxyrus boreas boreas) against Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), the amphibian fungal pathogen responsible for the greatest host biodiversity loss due to disease. Boreal toads have severely declined in Colorado (CO) due to Bd, but toad populations challenged with Bd in western Wyoming (WY) appear to be less affected. We used a common garden infection experiment to expose post-metamorphic toads sourced from four populations (2 in CO and 2 in WY) to Bd and monitored changes in mass, pathogen burden, and survival for eight weeks. We used a multi-state modeling approach to estimate weekly survival and transition probabilities between infected and cleared states, reflecting a dynamic infection process that traditional approaches fail to capture. We found that WY boreal toads are highly tolerant to Bd infection with higher survival probabilities than those in CO when infected with identical pathogen burdens. WY toads also had higher probabilities of clearing infections and took an average of five days longer to reach peak infection burdens. Our results demonstrate strong intraspecific differences in tolerance and resistance that explain why population declines vary regionally across the species. We used a robust, multi-state framework to gain inference on typically hidden disease processes when testing for host tolerance or resistance and demonstrated that describing an entire species as tolerant or resistant is unwise without testing for intraspecific variation in host defenses.

ecology↗

Survival cost to relocation does not reduce population self-sustainability in an amphibian

O_LIRelocations are increasingly popular among wildlife managers despite sharp debate and low rate of relocation success in vertebrates. In this context, understanding the influence of extrinsic (e.g., relocation design, habitat characteristics) and intrinsic factors (e.g., age and sex) on demographic parameters such as survival that regulate the dynamics of relocated populations is critical to improve relocation protocols and better predict relocation success.\nC_LIO_LIWe investigated survival in naturally established and relocated populations of yellow-bellied toads (Bombina variegata), an amphibian that was nearly extinct in Belgium by the late 1990s. We quantified survival at three ontogenetic stages (juvenile, subadult, and adult) in the relocated population, the source population, and a control population. In the relocated population, we quantified survival in captive bred individuals and their locally born descendants.\nC_LIO_LIWe showed that survival at juvenile and subadult stages was relatively similar in all populations. In contrast, relocated adult survival was lower than adult survival in the source and control populations. Despite this, offspring of relocated animals (the next generation, regardless of life stage) survived at similar rates to offspring in the source and control populations. Our simulations revealed that the relocated population was self-sustaining under different scenarios and that the fate (e.g., stability or finite rate of increase) of the simulated populations was highly dependent on the fecundity of relocated adults and their offspring.\nC_LIO_LIPolicy implications. Our results indicate that survival in relocated individuals is lower than in non-relocated individuals but that this cost (= reduced survival) disappears in the second generation. A finer understanding of how relocation affects demographic processes is an important step in improving relocation success of amphibians and other animals.\nC_LI

ecology↗