Biology subjects

Murugan, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Murugan, K..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

UNCOVERseq Enables Sensitive and Controlled Gene Editing Off-Target Nomination Across CRISPR-Cas Modalities and Systems

The rapid development of CRISPR-Cas gene editing technologies has revolutionized genetic medicine, offering unprecedented precision and potential for treating a wide array of genetic disorders. However, assessing the risks of unintended gene editing effects remains critical, and is complicated by new editing modalities and unclear analytical guidelines. We present UNCOVERseq (Unbiased Nomination of CRISPR Off-target Variants using Enhanced RhPCR), an improved in cellulo off-target nomination workflow designed to sensitively nominate off-target sites (<0.01% editing) with defined input requirements and analytical process controls to provide empirical performance evidence across diverse circumstances. Using this workflow, we nominated off-targets across 192 guide RNAs (gRNAs) and demonstrated superior performance compared to existing methodologies. We identified a subset of six gRNAs with a dynamic range of specificity and confirmed the relevance and high true positive rate of our nomination method, providing relative risk assessments for multiple modalities (S.p. Cas9 and derived high-fidelity variants / base editors) in a translational system involving hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). Additionally, we established that double-strand break (DSB) editing retains a strong, positive rank correlation to single-strand break (SSB)-mediated base editing, highlighting the importance of DSB nomination sites as candidate loci for base editing. Overall, UNCOVERseq improves informed risk assessment of gene editing in translational systems by enhancing the quality of off-target nomination.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Comparative analysis of CRISPR off-target activity discovery tools following ex vivo editing of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

While CRISPR-based editing most often occurs at DNA sequences with perfect homology to the guide RNA (gRNA), unintended editing can occur at highly homologous regions (i.e., off-target (OT) sites). Due to the pace at which genome editing therapies are approaching clinical applications, there is an emerging need to define effective workflows for investigating OT editing effects. A number of homology-dependent, in silico-based prediction methods and wet lab-based empirical methods exist to investigate OT editing, but few have been subjected to analytical assessment or head-to-head comparison in human primary cells using an ex vivo editing process optimized for high-fidelity gene editing. Therefore, we sought to compare publicly available in silico tools (COSMID, CCTop, and Cas-OFFinder) as well as empirical methods (CHANGE-Seq, CIRCLE-Seq, DISCOVER-Seq, GUIDE-Seq, and SITE-Seq) in the context of ex vivo hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) editing. To do so, we edited CD34+ HSPCs using 11 different guide RNAs (gRNAs) complexed with HiFi Cas9, then performed targeted next-generation sequencing of ~200-site panels containing a range of nominated OT sites identified by in silico and empirical methods. We identified an average of 0.45 OT sites per gRNA at an indel detection limit of 0.5%. This study confirmed the marked improvement in specificity with HiFi Cas9 compared to wild-type Cas9 without compromising on-target activity when delivered as an RNP. Additionally, all HiFi Cas9 OT sites using a standard 20nt gRNA were identified by all OT detection methods with one exception (SITE-seq did not identify an OT generated by an AAVS1 gRNA). This resulted in high sensitivity for the majority of OT nomination tools, however due to the large number of false positives called by most methods, in silico-based COSMID and empirical methods DISCOVER-Seq and GUIDE-Seq attained the highest positive predictive value. We did not find the empirical methods identified off-target sites that were not also identified by bioinformatic methods when delivered as an RNP complex. Finally, this study supports that refined bioinformatic algorithms could be developed that maintain both high sensitivity as well as positive predictive value which would enable more efficient identification of potential off-target sites without compromising a thorough examination for any given gRNA.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

High-throughput in vitro specificity profiling of natural and high-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 variants

Cas9 is an RNA-guided endonuclease in the bacterial CRISPR-Cas immune system and a popular tool for genome editing. The most commonly used Cas9 variant, Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9), is relatively non-specific and prone to off-target genome editing. Other Cas9 orthologs and engineered variants of SpCas9 have been reported to be more specific than wild-type (WT) SpCas9. However, systematic comparisons of the cleavage activities of these Cas9 variants have not been reported. In this study, we employed our high-throughput in vitro cleavage assay to compare cleavage activities and specificities of two natural Cas9 variants (SpCas9 and Staphylococcus aureus Cas9) and three engineered SpCas9 variants (SpCas9 HF1, HypaCas9, and HiFi Cas9). We observed that all Cas9s tested were able to cleave target sequences with up to five mismatches. However, the rate of cleavage of both on-target and off-target sequences varied based on the target sequence and Cas9 variant. For targets with multiple mismatches, SaCas9 and engineered SpCas9 variants are more prone to nicking, while WT SpCas9 creates double-strand breaks (DSB). These differences in cleavage rates and DSB formation may account for the varied specificities observed in genome editing studies. Our analysis reveals mismatch position-dependent, off-target nicking activity of Cas9 variants which have been underreported in previous in vivo studies.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2019

Pervasive off-target and double-stranded DNA nicking by CRISPR-Cas12a

Cas12a (formerly Cpf1) is an RNA-guided endonuclease in the CRISPR-Cas immune system that can be easily programmed for genome editing. Cas12a can bind and cut dsDNA targets with high specificity in vivo, making it an ideal candidate for precise genome editing applications. This specificity is contradictory to the natural role of Cas12a as an immune effector against rapidly evolving phages. However, the native cleavage specificity and activity remains to be fully understood. We employed high-throughput in vitro cleavage assays to determine and compare the native specificities of three Cas12a orthologs. Surprisingly, we observed pervasive nicking of randomized target libraries, with strong nicking activity observed against targets with up to four mismatches. Nicking and cleavage activities are dependent on mismatch type and position, and vary depending on the Cas12a ortholog and crRNA sequence. Our high-throughput and biochemical analysis further reveal that Cas12a has robust activated non-specific nicking and weak non-specific dsDNA degradation activity in trans. Together, our findings reveal Cas12a cleavage activities that could be beneficial in the context of bacterial CRISPR-Cas immunity but may be detrimental for genome editing technology.

biochemistry↗