Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Muneret, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Muneret, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Natural weed seed predators reduce crop yield loss due to weeds by 20% in cereal fields

While many herbicide active substances have been banned and weed infestation is a major threat to crop productivity, it is still unknown to what extent natural weed control provided by seed predators can help farmers manage weed communities. We aim to quantify the contribution of seed predators to crop productivity through weed control and to evaluate whether the magnitude of their influence depends on farming systems such as conservation agriculture. We set up 112 seed predator-exclusion cages in 28 cereal fields in France (14 pairs of conservation and conventional agriculture fields), surveyed weed emergence and biomass, measured crop yield and sampled the main seed predators: carabid beetles and rodents. We found that seed predators activity reduces the yield loss due to weeds by 20%. By extrapolation, it represents an economic gain of 285{euro}/ha. However, the yield loss remains at 60% below the maximum crop yield potential reached in the absence of weeds. Moreover, conservation agriculture enhances weed control, but this does not translate into increased crop yield. This study demonstrates the tangible importance of considering seed predators for weed control but highlights the need to combine this approach with weed control practices or to substantially redesign cropping systems to enhance the beneficial effects of biodiversity on crop productivity. Significance statementAlthough weed biomass is the main driver of decreasing the crop productivity worldwide and the use of herbicides is massively disparaged, we have not yet quantified the role played by on-farm biodiversity to control weeds. Using an experimental design set up in 28 commercial cereal fields in France, we showed that weed seed predators reduce crop yield loss due to weeds by 20%. By extrapolation, it represents an economic gain of 285{euro}/ha. However, in the absence of any other weed control practices, the yield loss remains at 60% below the maximum crop yield potential reached in the absence of weeds. This study demonstrates the quantitative importance of considering seed predators to design pesticide-free systems.

ecology↗

Converting cropping systems into seasonal habitat functionality reveals the hump-shaped responses of carabid beetles to agricultural management

O_LIUnderstanding effects on the huge diversity of cropping systems on local biodiversity is challenging but necessary to implement agroecological systems. Through a functional approach, the translation of cropping systems into resource and disturbance gradients is promising to decipher the relationship between cropping systems and biodiversity but has never been implemented for arthropods. C_LIO_LITo investigate contributions of resource and disturbance gradients arising from cropping systems vs environmental context (regional effect, meteorological conditions and landscape characteristics) on beneficial arthropod communities, we used a dataset collected in 60 crop fields from three French areas over a five-years period. It includes all farmers interventions, crop sequences, meteorological data, landscape composition and carabid samplings. C_LIO_LIWe found that the environmental context contributed to about 75% of explained carabid variations on average, while resource and disturbance gradients contributed to about 25% of explained carabid variations. The resource and disturbance gradients were particularly important in winter and spring preceding the spring-summer period to determine carabid variations. C_LIO_LIMoreover, we identified thresholds above which resource and disturbance gradients start being beneficial or detrimental for carabids. For example, a Treatment Frequency Index above 2.07 in spring decreased the total activity density of carabids during the spring-summer period. C_LIO_LISynthesis and application. While implementing for the first time a functional approach to understand the effects of different facets of cropping systems on arthropods, our study also allows us to identify periods and thresholds above which specific practices affect carabids. The identification of such thresholds can guide the provision of recommendations for policy, stakeholders and farmers about how to reduce cropping systems impact on arthropods. C_LI

ecology↗

Organic farming expansion drives natural enemy abundance not diversity in agricultural landscapes

O_LIOrganic farming is seen as a prototype of ecological intensification able to conciliate crop productivity and biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes. However, how natural enemies, an important functional group supporting pest control services, respond to organic farming at different scales and in different landscape contexts remain unclear.\nC_LIO_LIUsing a hierarchical design within a vineyard-dominated region located in southwestern France, we examine the independent effects of organic farming and semi-natural habitats at the local and landscape scales on natural enemies.\nC_LIO_LIWe show that the proportion of organic farming is a stronger driver of species abundance than the proportion of semi-natural habitats and is an important facet of landscape heterogeneity shaping natural enemy assemblages. Although our study highlight a strong taxonomic group-dependency about the effect of organic farming, organic farming benefits to dominant species while rare species occur at the same frequency in the two farming systems.\nC_LIO_LIIndependently of farming systems, enhancing field age, reducing crop productivity, soil tillage intensity and pesticide use are key management options to increase natural enemy biodiversity.\nC_LIO_LISynthesis and Applications. Our study indicates that policies promoting the expansion of organic farming will benefit more to ecological intensification strategies seeking to enhance ecosystem services than to biodiversity conservation.\nC_LI

ecology↗