Biology subjects

Mule, M. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Mule, M. P..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Contrasting autoimmune and treatment effects reveals baseline set points of immune toxicity following checkpoint inhibitor treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the cancer treatment landscape, but severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can be life-threatening or fatal and may prohibit patients from receiving further ICI treatment. While the clinical features of irAEs are well documented, molecular signatures, predictive biomarkers, and mechanisms of impending irAEs are largely unknown. In addition, the markers and mechanisms of ICI-induced antitumor immunity often overlap with those for irAEs. It is thus critical to uncover signatures associated specifically with irAEs but not with antitumor immunity. To identify circulating immune cell states associated with irAEs, we applied multimodal single cell analysis (CITE-seq) to simultaneously measure the transcriptome and surface proteins from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected before and after treatment with an anti-PD-L1 antibody (avelumab) in patients with thymic cancers (thymic epithelial tumors). All patients had an antitumor response, yet a subset developed muscle autoimmunity (myositis), a potentially life-threatening irAE. Mixed-effect modeling disentangled cell type-specific transcriptional states associated with ICI treatment responses from those of irAEs to identify temporally stable pre-treatment immune set points associated with irAEs only. These pre-treatment baseline signatures of irAE developed post-avelumab irAEs reflect correlated transcriptional states of multiple innate and adaptive immune cell populations, including elevation of metabolic genes downstream of mTOR signaling in T-cell subsets. Together these findings suggest putative pre-treatment biomarkers for irAEs following ICI therapy in thymic cancer patients and raise the prospect of therapeutically dampening autoimmunity while sparing antitumor activity in cancer patients treated with ICIs. Together, pre-treatment biomarkers and interventional therapeutics could help mitigate treatment discontinuation and improve clinical outcomes.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2022

Transcriptional atlas of the human immune response to 13 vaccines reveals a common predictor of vaccine-induced antibody responses

Systems biology approaches have been used to define molecular signatures and mechanisms of immunity to vaccination. However, most such studies have been done with single vaccines, and comparative analysis of the response to different vaccines is lacking. We integrated temporal transcriptional data of over 3,000 samples, obtained from 820 healthy adults across 28 studies of 13 different vaccines and analyzed vaccination-induced signatures associated with the antibody response. Most vaccines induced similar kinetics of shared transcriptional signatures, including signatures of innate immunity occurring 1-3 days post-vaccination, as well as the canonical plasmablast and cell cycle signatures appearing 7 days post-vaccination. However, the yellow fever vaccine YF-17D uniquely induced an early transient signature of T and B cell activation at Day 1, followed by delayed antiviral/interferon and plasmablast signatures that peaked at Days 7 and 14-21, respectively. Thus, despite the shared transcriptional response to most vaccines, at any given time point there was no evidence for a "universal signature" that could be used to predict the antibody response to all vaccines. However, accounting for the asynchronous nature of responses led to the identification of a time-adjusted signature that improved prediction antibody of responses across vaccines. These results provide a transcriptional atlas of the human immune response to vaccination and define a common, time-adjusted signature of antibody responses to vaccination.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2021

The Immune Signatures Data Resource: A compendium of systems vaccinology datasets

Vaccines are among the most cost-effective public health interventions for preventing infection-induced morbidity and mortality, yet much remains to be learned regarding the mechanisms by which vaccines protect. Systems immunology combines traditional immunology with modern omic profiling techniques and computational modeling to promote rapid and transformative advances in vaccinology and vaccine discovery. The NIH/NIAID Human Immunology Project Consortium (HIPC) has leveraged systems immunology approaches to identify molecular signatures associated with the immunogenicity of many vaccines, including those targeting seasonal influenza, yellow fever, and hepatitis B. These data are made available to the broader scientific community through the ImmuneSpace data portal and analysis engine leveraging the NIH/NIAID ImmPort repository1,2. However, a barrier to progress in this area is that comparative analyses have been limited by the distributed nature of some data, potential batch effects across studies, and the absence of multiple relevant studies from non-HIPC groups in ImmPort. To support comparative analyses across different vaccines, we have created the Immune Signatures Data Resource, a compendium of standardized systems vaccinology datasets. This data resource is available through ImmuneSpace, along with code to reproduce the processing and batch normalization starting from the underlying study data in ImmPort and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The current release comprises 1405 participants from 53 cohorts profiling the response to 24 different vaccines and includes transcriptional profiles and antibody response measurements. This novel systems vaccinology data release represents a valuable resource for comparative and meta-analyses that will accelerate our understanding of mechanisms underlying vaccine responses. [Table 1]

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2021

An innate immune activation state prior to vaccination predicts responsiveness to multiple vaccines

Many factors determine whether an individual responding to vaccination will generate an immune response that can lead to protection. Several studies have shown that the pre-vaccination immune state is associated with the antibody response to vaccines. However, the generalizability and mechanisms that underlie this association remain poorly defined. Here, we sought to identify a common pre-vaccination signature and mechanisms that could predict the immune response across a wide variety of vaccines. We leveraged the "Immune Signatures Data Resource" created by the NIH Human Immunology Project Consortium (HIPC) to integrate data from 28 studies involving 13 different vaccines and associate the blood transcriptional status of 820 healthy young adults with their responses. An unsupervised analysis of blood transcriptional profiles across studies revealed three distinct pre-vaccination states, characterized by the differential expression of genes associated with a pro-inflammatory response, cell proliferation, and metabolism alterations downstream of NF{kappa}B and IRF7. Innate and adaptive immune cell subset-specific genes were also associated with the three pre-vaccination states. Importantly, individuals whose pre-vaccination state was enriched in pro-inflammatory response genes known to be downstream of NF{kappa}B tended to have higher serum antibody responses one month after vaccination. A supervised analysis of the same data resulted in a single classifier, also enriched for NF{kappa}B regulated genes, that predicted the antibody response across most of the vaccines. Projection into single-cell RNA-sequencing data suggested that this pre-vaccination state was attributable to the signature of activation of non-classical monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells. Transcriptional signatures of acute responses to bacterial and not viral infections were enriched in the high pro-inflammatory pre-vaccination state and also included NF{kappa}B regulated genes. The pro-inflammatory pre-vaccination state was highly reminiscent of the innate activation state triggered by TLR ligands or adjuvants. These results demonstrate that wide variations in the transcriptional state of the immune system in humans can be a key determinant of responsiveness to vaccination. They also define a transcriptional signature NF{kappa}B activation at baseline, that is associated with a greater magnitude of antibody response to multiple vaccines, and suggest that modulation of the innate immune system by next-generation adjuvants targeting NF{kappa}B before vaccine administration may improve vaccine responsiveness.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Molecular measurable residual disease testing of blood during AML cytotoxic therapy for early prediction of clinical response

AbstractO_ST_ABSPURPOSEC_ST_ABSMeasurable residual disease (MRD) testing after initial chemotherapy treatment can predict relapse and survival in AML. However, it has not been established if repeat molecular or genetic testing during chemotherapy can offer information regarding the chemotherapy sensitivity of the leukemic clone.\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODSBlood from 45 adult AML patients at day 1 and 4 of induction (n = 35) or salvage (n = 10) cytotoxic chemotherapy was collected for both quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assessment (WT1) and next generation sequencing (NGS, >500x depth) of 49 gene regions recurrently mutated in MDS/AML.\n\nRESULTSThe median age was 62 (23-78); 42% achieved a complete response. WT1 was overexpressed in most patients tested but was uninformative for very early MRD assessment. A median of 4 non-synonymous variants (range 0-7) were detected by DNA sequencing of blood on day 1 of therapy (median VAF: 29%). Only two patients had no variants detectable. All mutations remained detectable in blood on day 4 of intensive chemotherapy and remarkably the ratio of mutated to wild-type sequence was often maintained. This phenomenon was not limited to variants in DNMT3A, TET2 and ASXL1. The kinetics of NPM1 and TP53 variant burden early during chemotherapy appeared to be exceptions and exhibited consistent trends in this cohort.\n\nCONCLUSIONSMolecular testing of blood on day 4 of chemotherapy is not predictive of clinical response in AML. The observed stability in variant allele frequency suggests that cytotoxic therapy may have a limited therapeutic index for clones circulating in blood containing these mutations. Further validation is required to confirm the utility of monitoring NPM1 and TP53 kinetics in blood during cytotoxic therapy.

cancer biology↗