Mukaka, M. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2019

Both the inflammatory response and clinical outcome differ markedly between adults with pneumococcal and meningococcal meningitis in a high HIV-1 prevalent setting in sub-Saharan Africa

Outcomes from pneumococcal meningitis (PM) are worse than meningococcal meningitis (MM), particularly in settings with high HIV-1 prevalence, but the reasons are unknown. We compared inflammatory responses between PM and MM in Malawian adults. As compared to MM (n=27, 67% HIV-infected, mortality 11%), patients with PM (n=440, 84% HIV-infected, mortality 54%) were older, had strikingly lower CSF WCC, higher pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations and higher mortality. PM is characterized by significantly lower CSF WCC, but greater inflammation and higher mortality compared to MM. Mechanistic understanding of blunting of the CSF leukocyte response in PM in-vivo is required.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2018

Impact of efavirenz, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and nevirapine based antiretroviral regimens on the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine and safety of artemether-lumefantrine in falciparum-negative HIV-infected Malawian adults stabilized on antiretroviral therapy

There is conflicting evidence of the impact of commonly used antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) on the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine and safety profile of artemether-lumefantrine. We compared the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-14 days) of lumefantrine and safety profile of artemether-lumefantrine in malaria-negative human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected adults in two steps. In step 1, a half-dose adult course of artemether-lumefantrine was administered as a safety check in four groups (n = 6/group): (i) antiretroviral-naive, (ii) on nevirapine-based ART, (iii) on efavirenz-based ART and (iv) on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based ART. In step 2, a standard-dose adult course of artemether-lumefantrine was administered to a different cohort in three groups (n = 10-15/group): (i) antiretroviral-naive, (ii) on efavirenz-based ART and (iii) on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based ART. In step 1, lumefantrines AUC0-14 days was 53% [95% CI: 0.27-0.82] lower in the efavirenz-based ART group than the ART-naive group and was 2.4 [95% CI: 1.58-3.62] and 2.9 [95% CI: 1.75-4.72] times higher in the nevirapine and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir groups, respectively. In step 2, lumefantrines AUC0-14 days was 1.9 [95% CI: 1.26-3.00] times higher in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group and not significantly different between the efavirenz-and ART-naive groups (0.99 [95% CI: 0.63-1.57]). Frequent cases of haematological abnormalities (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) were observed in the nevirapine group in step 1, leading to a recommendation from the data and safety monitoring board not to include a nevirapine group in step 2. Artemether-lumefantrine was well tolerated in the other groups. The therapeutic implications of these findings need to be evaluated among HIV-malaria co-infected adults.

pharmacology and toxicology↗