Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Moxley, D. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Moxley, D. R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Transgenerational plasticity affects fitness and mediates local adaptation

Transgenerational plasticity (TGP) could be as decisive of a factor in phenotypic outcomes as allelic variation and within-generation plasticity. While TGP is often associated with priming offspring to stress in stable environments (where offspring and grandparents are likely to experience similar stresses), our results suggest that TGP is locally adaptive for offspring when grandparents are exposed to environments that match historical conditions, regardless of the offsprings environment. Specifically, we find that Mimulus cardinalis populations from historically wet environments exhibit adaptive TGP in grand-offspring, via increased male and female fitness, only when grandparents experience wet treatments, while TGP is maladaptive when these grandparents experience dry treatments. In contrast, populations from historically dry environments show the opposite. Furthermore, we find that TGP can have a greater effect on both male and female fitness than allelic differences and within-generation plasticity. Our results indicate an additional way that phenotypes arise through local adaption and sheds light on the potential for how rapid evolution might occur.

evolutionary biology↗

Parallel shifts of visual sensitivity and body colouration in replicate populations of extremophile fish.

Visual sensitivity and body pigmentation are often shaped by both natural selection from the environment and sexual selection from mate choice. One way of quantifying the impact of the environment is by measuring how traits have changed after colonization of a novel habitat. To do this, we studied Poecilia mexicana populations that have repeatedly adapted to extreme sulphidic (H2S containing) environments. We measured visual sensitivity using opsin gene expression, as well as body pigmentation and water transmission for populations in four independent drainages. Both visual sensitivity and body pigmentation showed significant parallel shifts towards greater medium wavelength sensitivity and reflectance in sulphidic populations. The light spectrum was only subtly different between environments and overall, we found no significant correlations between the light environment and visual sensitivity or body pigmentation. Altogether we found that sulphidic habitats select for differences in visual sensitivity and pigmentation; our data suggest that this effect is unlikely to be driven purely by the waters spectral properties and may instead be from other correlated ecological changes.

evolutionary biology↗