Morgan, C. N. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

Historic and contemporary museum specimens implicate Northern Red-backed Vole (Clethrionomys rutilus) as borealpox host as early as 1990s

Borealpox virus (BRPV; formerly Alaskapox) is an orthopoxvirus that has caused seven reported human infections in Alaska since 2015, including a fatal case in 2023. The natural reservoir of BRPV is unknown, although previous investigations have raised the possibility of wild small mammals transmitting the virus to humans, either through direct contact or via domestic cats and dogs. To understand which species may be involved in the maintenance and/or spillover of BRPV in Alaska, we trapped and sampled wild small mammals (including voles, shrews, and squirrels) in 2021 and 2024 near reported human case locations in Fairbanks and the Kenai Peninsula, respectively. We found evidence of previous exposure to orthopoxviruses in five species (including the House Mouse, Mus musculus) and detected BRPV DNA as well as viable virus in Northern Red-backed Voles (Clethrionomys rutilus). Further, screening of tissues from historical museum specimens revealed BRPV DNA in C. rutilus specimens collected in Denali National Park and Preserve in 1998 and 1999, 17 years before the first reported human case of BRPV. Phylogenomic analysis of all human and animal BRPV isolates strongly supports the hypothesis of local human infections through multiple spillover events. These findings suggest C. rutilus as a possible reservoir species for BRPV and indicate that BRPV has been present in Alaskan wild small-mammal populations for at least 25 years. Our study highlights the potential of museum collections to elucidate the temporal, spatial, and host ranges of emerging pathogens. Further museum- and field-based sampling will clarify the true geographic range of BRPV, which is closely related to Old World orthopoxviruses and may be circulating beyond North America.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

A Novel Restraint Device to Improve Safety and Efficacy of Blood Collection During Non-Terminal Sampling of Bats

There are a variety of blood collection techniques described in the literature for unanesthetized bats, which typically require multiple sharps (e.g., needles, lancets, etc.), competent animal handling for prolonged periods, and usually involve two individuals. With the challenges inherent to non-terminal sampling of blood from bats, as well as the growing need for the use of this technique across multiple disciplines and industries, an improved blood collection method is needed. We report the creation of a bat restraint device specifically designed for a single individual to safely collect blood from anesthetized or non-anesthetized bats. The utility of this restraint device is multifaceted, serving as a safety measure for both animal and handler, as well as increasing the efficiency of blood collection. The restraint device was tested during two laboratory bat studies, Afterwards, the users of the restraint device were provided with a 10-question survey questionnaire to record their opinions on its usage. In total 80% of responses were considered positive, 15% considered neutral, and 5% considered negative. Survey questions that all participants responded to positively when in comparison to the traditional method of blood collection from bats include "easier to perform", "safer to bats", and "safer to the individual". While using the restraint devices during the laboratory studies, no needle sticks, bites, or scratches to laboratorians occurred, and no observable health issues or complication due to blood collection in the bats bled using the restraint devices.

zoology↗