Morandin, C. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2021

Tools and applications for integrative analysis of DNA methylation in social insects

DNA methylation is a common epigenetic signaling tool and an important biological process which is widely studied in a large array of species. The presence, level, and function of DNA methylation varies greatly across species. In insects, DNA methylation systems are reduced, and methylation rates are often low. Low methylation levels probed by whole genome bisulfite sequencing require great care with respect to data quality control and interpretation. Here we introduce BWASP/R, a complete workflow that allows efficient, scalable, and entirely reproducible analyses of raw DNA methylation sequencing data. Consistent application of quality control filters and analysis parameters provides fair comparisons among different studies and an integrated view of all experiments on one species. We describe the capabilities of the BWASP/R workflow by re-analyzing several publicly available social insect WGBS data sets, comprising 70 samples and cumulatively 147 replicates from four different species. We show that the CpG methylome comprises only about 1.5% of CpG sites in the honeybee genome and that the cumulative data are consistent with genetic signatures of site accessibility and physiological control of methylation levels. Significance StatementDNA methylation in the honeybee genome occurs almost entirely at CpG sites. Methylation rates are small compared to rates in mammalian or plant genomes. De novo analysis of all published honeybee methylation studies and statistical modeling suggests that the CpG methylome consists of about only 300,000 sites. The development of a fully reproducible, scalable, portable workflow allows for easy accessible updates of integrative views of all current experiments. The integrated results for the honeybee are consistent with genetic determination of methylation site accessibility by yet uncharacterized sequence features and physiological control of methylation levels at those sites.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Researchers preferentially collaborate with same-gendered colleagues across the life sciences

Evidence suggests that women in academia are hindered by conscious and unconscious biases, and often feel excluded from formal and informal opportunities for research collaboration. In addition to ensuring fairness and helping to redress gender imbalance in the academic workforce, increasing womens access to collaboration could help scientific progress by drawing on more of the available human capital. Here, we test whether researchers tend to collaborate with same-gendered colleagues, using more stringent methods and a larger dataset than in past work. Our results reaffirm that researchers co-publish with colleagues of the same gender more often than expected by chance, and show that this gender homophily is slightly stronger today than it was 10 years ago. Contrary to our expectations, we found no evidence that homophily is driven mostly by senior academics, and no evidence that homophily is stronger in fields where women are in the minority. Interestingly, journals with a high impact factor for their discipline tended to have comparatively low homophily, as predicted if mixed-gender teams produce better research. We discuss some potential causes of gender homophily in science.

scientific communication and education↗