Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Moran, R. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Moran, R. J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

In vivo assay of cortical microcircuitry in frontotemporal dementia: a platform for experimental medicine studies

The analysis of neural circuits can provide critical insights into the mechanisms of neurodegeneration and dementias, and offer potential quantitative biological tools to assess novel therapeutics. Here we use behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) as a model disease. We demonstrate that inversion of canonical microcircuit models to non-invasive human magnetoecphalography can identify the regional- and laminar-specificity of bvFTD pathophysiology, and their parameters can accurately differentiate patients from matched healthy controls. Using such models, we show that changes in local coupling in frontotemporal dementia underlie the failure to adequately establish sensory predictions, leading to altered prediction error responses in a cortical information-processing hierarchy. Using machine learning, this model-based approach provided greater case-control classification accuracy than conventional evoked cortical responses. We suggest that this approach provides an in vivo platform for testing mechanistic hypotheses about disease progression and pharmacotherapeutics.

neuroscience

Locus Coeruleus tracking of prediction errors optimises cognitive flexibility: an Active Inference model.

The locus coeruleus (LC) in the pons is the major source of noradrenaline (NA) in the brain. Two modes of LC firing have been associated with distinct cognitive states: changes in tonic rates of firing are correlated with global levels of arousal and behavioural flexibility, whilst phasic LC responses are evoked by salient stimuli. Here, we unify these two modes of firing by modelling the response of the LC as a correlate of a prediction error when inferring states for action planning under Active Inference (AI).\n\nWe simulate a classic Go/No-go reward learning task and a three-arm foraging task and show that, if LC activity is considered to reflect the magnitude of high level state-action prediction errors, then both tonic and phasic modes of firing are emergent features of belief updating. We also demonstrate that when contingencies change, AI agents can update their internal models more quickly by feeding back this state-action prediction error - reflected in LC firing and noradrenaline release - to optimise learning rate, enabling large adjustments over short timescales. We propose that such prediction errors are mediated by cortico-LC connections, whilst ascending input from LC to cortex modulates belief updating in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).\n\nIn short, we characterise the LC/ NA system within a general theory of brain function. In doing so, we show that contrasting, behaviour-dependent firing patterns are an emergent property of the LCs crucial role in translating prediction errors into an optimal mediation between plasticity and stability.\n\nAuthor SummaryThe brain uses sensory information to build internal models and make predictions about the world. When errors of prediction occur, models must be updated to ensure desired outcomes are still achieved. Neuromodulator chemicals provide a possible pathway for triggering such changes in brain state. One such neuromodulator, noradrenaline, originates predominantly from a cluster of neurons in the brainstem - the locus coeruleus (LC) - and plays a key role in behaviour, for instance, in determining the balance between exploiting or exploring the environment.\n\nHere we use Active Inference (AI), a mathematical model of perception and action, to formally describe LC function. We propose that LC activity is triggered by errors in prediction and that the subsequent release of noradrenaline alters the rate of learning about the environment. Biologically, this describes an LC-cortex feedback loop promoting behavioural flexibility in times of uncertainty. We model LC output as a simulated animal performs two tasks known to elicit archetypal responses. We find that experimentally observed phasic and tonic patterns of LC activity emerge naturally, and that modulation of learning rates improves task performance. This provides a simple, unified computational account of noradrenergic computational function within a general model of behaviour.

neuroscience

Indexing sensory plasticity: Evidence for distinct Predictive Coding and Hebbian Learning mechanisms in the cerebral cortex

HighlightsO_LIERP and DCM study of two sensory plasticity paradigms: roving MMN and visual LTP\nC_LIO_LIFirst demonstration of multiple learning mechanisms under different task demands\nC_LIO_LIEvidence for both Predictive Coding and Hebbian learning mechanisms\nC_LIO_LIThe BDNF Val66Met polymorphism modulates ERPs for both paradigms\nC_LIO_LIHowever, the polymorphism only modulates MMN network connectivity\nC_LI\n\nThe Roving Mismatch Negativity (MMN), and Visual LTP paradigms are widely used as independent measures of sensory plasticity. However, the paradigms are built upon fundamentally different (and seemingly opposing) models of perceptual learning; namely, Predictive Coding (MMN) and Hebbian plasticity (LTP). The aims of the current study were to 1) compare the generative mechanisms of the MMN and visual LTP, therefore assessing whether Predictive Coding and Hebbian mechanisms co-occur in the brain, and 2) assess whether the paradigms identify similar group differences in plasticity. Forty participants were split into two groups based on the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and were presented with both paradigms. Consistent with Predictive Coding and Hebbian predictions, Dynamic Causal Modelling revealed that the generation of the MMN modulates forward and backward connections in the underlying network, while visual LTP only modulates forward connections. Genetic differences were identified in the ERPs for both paradigms, but were only apparent in backward connections of the MMN network. These results suggest that both Predictive Coding and Hebbian mechanisms are utilized by the brain under different task demands. Additionally, both tasks provide unique insight into plasticity mechanisms, which has important implications for future studies of aberrant plasticity in clinical populations.

neuroscience