Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Moran, J. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Moran, J. K..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Early evoked brain activity underlies auditory and audiovisual speech recognition deficits in schizophrenia

ObjectivesPeople with Schizophrenia (SZ) show deficits in auditory and audiovisual speech recognition. It is possible that these deficits are related to aberrant early sensory processing, combined with an impaired ability to utilize visual cues to improve speech recognition. In this electroencephalography study we tested this by having SZ and healthy controls (HC) identify different unisensory auditory and bisensory audiovisual syllables at different auditory noise levels. MethodsSZ (N = 24) and HC (N = 21) identified one of three different syllables (/da/, /ga/, /ta/) at three different noise levels (no, low, high). Half the trials were unisensory auditory and the other half provided additional visual input of moving lips. Task-evoked mediofrontal N1 and P2 brain potentials triggered to the onset of the auditory syllables were derived and related to behavioral performance. ResultsIn comparison to HC, SZ showed speech recognition deficits for unisensory and bisensory stimuli. These deficits were primarily found in the no noise condition. Paralleling these observations, reduced N1 amplitudes to unisensory and bisensory stimuli in SZ were found in the no noise condition. In HC the N1 amplitudes were positively related to the speech recognition performance, whereas no such relationships were found in SZ. Moreover, no group differences in multisensory speech recognition benefits and N1 suppression effects for bisensory stimuli were observed. ConclusionOur study shows that reduced N1 amplitudes relate to auditory and audiovisual speech processing deficits in SZ. The findings that the amplitude effects were confined to salient speech stimuli and the attenuated relationship with behavioral performance, compared to HC, indicates a diminished decoding of the auditory speech signals in SZs. Our study also revealed intact multisensory benefits in SZs, which indicates that the observed auditory and audiovisual speech recognition deficits were primarily related to aberrant auditory speech processing. HighlightsSpeech processing deficits in schizophrenia related to reduced N1 amplitudes Audiovisual suppression effect in N1 preserved in schizophrenia Schizophrenia showed weakened P2 components in specifically audiovisual processing

neuroscience↗

Early and late evoked brain responsesdifferentially reflect feature encoding andperception in the flash-lag illusion

In the flash-lag illusion (FLI), the position of a flash presented ahead of a moving bar is mislocalized, so the flash appears to lag the bar. Currently it is not clear whether this effect is due to early perceptual-related neural processes such as motion extrapolation or reentrant processing, or due to later feedback processing relating to postdiction, i.e. retroactively altered perception. We presented 17 participants with the FLI paradigm while recording EEG. A central flash occurred either 51ms ("early") or 16ms ("late") before the bar moving from left to right reached the screen center. Participants judged whether the flash appeared to the right ("no flash lag illusion") or to the left ("flash-lag illusion") of the bar. Using single-trial linear modelling, we examined the influence of timing ("early" vs. "late") and perception ("illusion" vs. "no illusion") on flash-evoked brain responses, and estimated the cortical sources underlying the FLI. Perception of the FLI was associated with a late window (368-452ms) in the ERP, with larger deflections for illusion than no illusion trials, localized to the left fusiform gyrus. An earlier frontal and occipital component (200-276ms) differentiated time-locked early vs. late stimulus presentation. Our results suggest a postdiction-related reconstruction of ambiguous sensory stimulation involving late processes in the occipito-temporal cortex, previously associated with temporal integration phenomena. This indicates that perception of the FLI relies on an interplay between ongoing stimulus encoding of the moving bar and feedback processing of the flash, which takes place at later integration stages. HighlightsFlash-lag illusion relates primarily to late evoked brain potentials (>300ms) Illusion vs. no-illusion trials showed difference in fusiform gyrus Flash-lag illusion could involve postdiction-driven integration of ongoing stimuli

neuroscience↗

Multisensory processes can compensate for attention deficits in schizophrenia

Studies on schizophrenia (SCZ) and aberrant multisensory integration (MSI) show conflicting results. These divergent results are potentially confounded by attention deficits in SCZ. To test this, we examined the interplay between MSI and intersensory attention (IA) in healthy controls (N=27) and in SCZ (N=27). Evoked brain potentials to unisensory-visual (V), unisensory-tactile (T) or bisensory VT stimuli were measured with high density electroencephalography, whilst participants attended block-wise to either visual or tactile inputs. Behaviourally, IA effects in SCZ are uncompromised for bisensory stimuli, but diminished for unisensory stimuli. At the neural level, we observed reduced IA effects for bisensory stimuli over mediofrontal scalp regions (230-320ms) in SCZ. The analysis of MSI revealed multiple phases of integration over occipital and frontal scalp regions (240-364ms), with comparable performance between HC and SCZ. The magnitudes of IA and MSI effects were both positively related to the behavioural performance in SCZ, indicating that IA and MSI mutually facilitate bisensory stimulus processing. Our study suggests that widely intact MSI, which facilitates stimulus processing, can compensate for top-down attention deficits in SCZ. Further, the interplay of IA and MSI implies that differences in attentional demands may account for previous conflicting findings on MSI in schizophrenia.

neuroscience↗