Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mohn, R. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Mohn, R. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Resolving the oak tree of life: comparing RADseq and whole genome resequencing methods for oak phylogenetics

Forest trees pose numerous potential challenges to phylogenomic inference. Their large effective population sizes and relatively long generation times lead to deep allele coalescence and consequently incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), which biases inferences of divergence times toward older ages and introduces gene tree discordance. Deep phylogenetic divergences, reaching back into the Paleocene, introduce reference-mapping biases. Introgression--the movement of genes between lineages--may result in different phylogenies being inferred depending on which individuals are included in analysis, even if the plurality of the genome favors the divergence history unaffected by introgression. These factors influence phylogenetic inference across the Tree of Life but are particularly prevalent in forest trees. Oaks (Quercus) are notable for all three influences. In addition, our knowledge of the oak phylogeny is currently based strongly on restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) datasets published over the past decade, which may introduce additional sources of uncertainty. In this chapter, we analyze a 322-species RADseq dataset and genome resequencing data from across the genus to address sources of uncertainty in our understanding of the global oak phylogeny, which we hope will serve as a model for other research groups working on comparable woody plant groups.

evolutionary biology↗

Over two orders of magnitude difference in rate of single chromosome loss among sundew (Drosera L., Droseraceae) lineages

Chromosome number change is a driver of speciation in eukaryotic organisms. Carnivorous sundews, the plant genus Drosera L., exhibit single chromosome number variation among and within species, especially in the Australian Drosera subg. Ergaleium D.C., potentially linked to the presence of holocentromeres. We reviewed literature, verified chromosome counts, and using an rbcL chronogram, tested alternate models where the gain, loss, and doubling rates (+1, -1, x2) were the same or different between D. subg. Ergaleium and the other subgenera. Ancestral chromosome number estimations were performed, and the distributions of self-compatibility and genome size were visualized across the genus. The best model for chromosome evolution had equal rates of polyploidy (0.014 per million years; Myr) but higher rates of single chromosome number gain (0.19 and 0.027 per Myr) and loss (0.23 and 0.00059 per Myr) in D. subg. Ergaleium compared to the other subgenera. We found no evidence for differences in single chromosome evolution to be due to differences in diploidization after polyploidy or to holocentromeres as had been proposed. This study highlights the complexity of factors influencing rates of chromosome number evolution.

evolutionary biology↗