Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Mohan, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Mohan, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

SOX2 can associate with chromatin directly by binding to DNA or indirectly via association with other chromatin-bound proteins

It is widely assumed that SOX2 regulates gene expression and facilitates the opening of chromatin by binding directly at SOX motifs. To test this assumption, we created a SOX2 DNA binding mutant to determine whether other regions of SOX2 contribute to gene target specificity. When exogenously expressed in cells, this SOX2 mutant [SOX2(G76P)], like elevated unmodified SOX2, dramatically alters the transcriptome, but it does so by regulating vastly different gene sets and gene networks than SOX2. Consistent with their differential effects on the transcriptome, ChIP-seq analysis demonstrates that SOX2 and SOX2(G76P) associate primarily with different genomic loci, and motif analysis indicates that SOX2 binds primarily at SOX motifs, whereas SOX2(G76P) associates with chromatin at non-SOX motifs, including AP-1 motifs. Additionally, ATAC-seq analysis indicates that SOX2 substantially increases chromatin accessibility, but SOX2(G76P) does not. The findings presented lead to the conclusion that SOX2(G76P) associates with chromatin indirectly by a "piggyback" mechanism through its association with other chromatin-associated proteins, including AP-1 complexes. Remarkably, we also show that SOX2 and SOX2(G76P) each associate with a subset of the same gene loci that contain several different DNA motifs, including AP-1 motifs, but no high confidence SOX motifs. Overall, our findings provide new perspectives on SOX2 and lead to two important conclusions: 1) selection of gene targets by SOX2 is not solely determined by its DNA binding domain, and 2) SOX2 not only associates with chromatin directly by binding to SOX motifs but can also associate with a subset of gene loci indirectly through its association with other chromatin-associated proteins.

molecular biology

Distinct cAMP signaling modalities mediate behavioral flexibility and consolidation of social status in Drosophila aggression.

Social rituals, like male-male aggression in Drosophila, are often stereotyped and the component behavioral patterns modular. The likelihood of transition from one behavioral pattern to another is malleable by experience and confers flexibility to the behavioral repertoire. Experience-dependent modification of innate aggressive behavior in flies alters fighting strategies during fights and establishes dominant-subordinate relationships. Dominance hierarchies resulting from agonistic encounters are consolidated to longer lasting social status-dependent behavioral modifications resulting in a robust loser effect.\n\nWe show that cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) dynamics regulated by the calcium/calmodulin-dependent adenylyl cyclase, Rut and the cAMP phosphodiesterase, Dnc but not the Amn gene product, in specific neuronal groups of the mushroom body and central complex, mediate behavioral plasticity necessary to establish dominant- subordinate relationships. rut and dnc mutant flies are unable to alter fighting strategies and establish dominance relationships during agonistic interactions. This real-time flexibility during a fight is independent of changes in aggression levels. Longer-term consolidation of social status in the form of a loser effect, however, requires additional Amn-dependent inputs to cAMP signaling and involves a circuit-level association between the /{beta} and {gamma} neurons of the mushroom body.\n\nOur findings implicate cAMP signaling in mediating plasticity of behavioral patterns in aggressive behavior and in the generation of a temporally stable memory trace that manifests as a loser effect.\n\nSUMMARY STATEMENTPhasic recruitment of different cAMP signaling modalities in specific neuronal groups lead to the formation of temporally distinct components of learning and memory in fly aggression.

neuroscience