Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mittermeier, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Mittermeier, R..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

First Comprehensive Examination of the Molecular Phylogenetics of Saki Monkeys, Genus Pithecia Desmarest, 1804, Reveals an Unexpectedly Low Taxonomic Diversity

Saki monkeys (Pithecia) are found exclusively in the Amazon, ranging from the Guiana Shield in the east to the Andean foothills in the west. The taxonomy of this genus is complex due to indeterminate type localities, numerous synonyms, sexual dichromatism and considerable geographical diversity in coat colour patterns. Previous assessments have indicated two to four species and a variable few subspecies based on morphological analyses of museum specimens. Just two species have been consistently recognised--Pithecia pithecia and Pithecia monachus. This study presents the first comprehensive molecular phylogeny of the genus, using mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences from 137 individuals across their range and a ddRADseq genomic analysis on 34 individuals. The phylogenetic results revealed three main clades: (1) Guiana Shield sakis, (2) Sedimentary Basin and Brazilian Shield sakis, and (3) a basal P. albicans south of the Rio Solimoes. The ddRADseq data further clarified species boundaries and relationships, identifying six distinct species: P. chrysocephala and P. pithecia sensu Hershkovitz (1987) on the Guiana Shield; P. albicans in central Amazonia south of the Rio Solimoes; P. monachus in western Amazonia; P. irrorata between the rios Purus, Tapajos, and Juruena; and P. vanzolinii in a limited area east of the Rio Jurua.

zoology↗

Only 40% of the world's forests are in good health

Many global environmental agendas, including halting biodiversity loss, reversing land degradation, and limiting climate change, depend upon retaining forests with high ecological integrity, yet the scale and degree of forest modification remains poorly quantified and mapped. By integrating data on observed and inferred human pressures and an index of lost connectivity, we generate the first globally-consistent, continuous index of forest condition as determined by degree of anthropogenic modification. Globally, only 17.4 million km2 of forest (40.5%) have high landscape level integrity (mostly found in Canada, Russia, the Amazon, Central Africa and New Guinea) and only 27% of this area is found in nationally-designated protected areas. Of the forest in protected areas, only 56% has high landscape level integrity. Ambitious policies that prioritize the retention of forest integrity, especially in the most intact areas, are now urgently needed alongside current efforts aimed at halting deforestation and restoring the integrity of forests globally.

ecology↗

The impact of the "World's 25 Most Endangered Primates" list on scientific publications and media

Assessing the impact of conservation campaigns is of high importance for optimizing the use of limited resources. Lists of threatened species are often used as media outreach tools, but their usefulness is rarely tested. We investigated whether the inclusion of a species in the list "Worlds 25 Most Endangered Primates", published biannually by the International Primatological Society, the International Union for Conservation of Natures Species Survival Commission Primate Specialist Group, and Conservation International from 2000, had an effect both on scientific publications and on the general public. We analyzed a database of 40 million articles from major scientific publishers (Elsevier, Springer, Nature, Plos, Pubmed, Biomed Central) finding an increase in the number of papers mentioning a species after its inclusion in the list. We also analyzed media penetration (data from Google News), and online interest (data from Google Blogs, Twitter, and Google Trends), collecting daily data for one month before and one after the official launch of the 2014-2016 list (24th November 2015). The results show a short spike of interest on Google News and Twitter but no long term effect, indicating a limited effect on the general public. Our results are important for the understanding of the impact of current conservation campaigns and to provide strategies for future campaigns.

scientific communication and education↗