Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Minaeva, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Minaeva, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Nicheformer: a foundation model for single-cell and spatial omics

Tissue makeup relies fundamentally on the cellular microenvironment. Spatial single-cell genomics allows probing the underlying cellular interactions in an unbiased, scalable fashion. To learn a unified cell representation that accounts for local dependencies in the cellular microenvironment, we propose Nicheformer, a transformer-based foundation model that combines human and mouse dissociated single-cell and targeted spatial transcriptomics data. Pretrained on over 57 million dissociated and 53 million spatially resolved cells across 73 tissues on cellular reconstruction, the model is fine-tuned on spatial tasks for spatial omics data to decode spatially resolved cellular information. Nicheformer excels in linear-probing and fine-tuning scenarios for a novel set of downstream tasks, in particular spatial composition prediction and spatial label prediction. We further show that existing foundation models trained on dissociated single-cell data alone are not capable of recapitulating the spatial complexity of cells in their microenvironments, indicating that multiscale models are required to understand complex local dependencies at scale. Nicheformer enables the prediction of the spatial context of dissociated cells, allowing the transfer of rich spatial information to scRNA-seq datasets. Overall, Nicheformer sets the stage for the next generation of machine-learning models in spatial single-cell analysis. Extended AbstractTissue makeup and the corresponding orchestration of vital biological activities, ranging from development and differentiation to immune response and regeneration, rely fundamentally on the cellular microenvironment and the interactions between cells. Spatial single-cell genomics allows probing such interactions in an unbiased and, increasingly, scalable fashion. To learn a unified cell representation that accounts for local dependencies in the cellular microenvironment and the underlying cell interactions, we propose to generalize recent foundation modeling approaches for disassociated single-cell transcriptomics to the spatial omics setting. Our model, Nicheformer, is a transformer-based foundation model that combines human and mouse dissociated single-cell and targeted spatial transcriptomics data to learn a cellular representation useful for a large variety of downstream tasks. Nicheformer is pretrained on over 57 million dissociated and 53 million spatially resolved cells across 73 tissues from both human and mouse. Subsequently, the model is fine-tuned on spatial tasks for spatial omics data to decode spatially resolved cellular information. We demonstrate the usefulness of Nicheformer in both linear-probing as well as fine-tuning scenarios on a novel set of spatially-relevant downstream tasks such as spatial density prediction or niche and region label prediction. In particular, we show that Nicheformer enables the prediction of the spatial context of dissociated cells, allowing the transfer of rich spatial information to scRNA-seq datasets. We define a series of novel spatial prediction problems and observe consistent top performance of Nicheformer, demonstrating the advantage of the improved model capacity of the underlying transformer. Additionally, we benchmarked Nicheformer in these tasks against scGPT1, Geneformer2, scVI3 and PCA and show that the Nicheformer architecture excels in these tasks. Altogether, our large-scale resource of more than 110 million cells in a partial spatial context, together with the set of novel spatial learning tasks and the Nicheformer model itself, will pave the way for the next generation of machine-learning models for spatial single-cell analysis.

bioinformatics↗

Non-linear transcriptional responses to gradual modulation of transcription factor dosage

Genomic loci associated with common traits and diseases are typically non-coding and likely impact gene expression, sometimes coinciding with rare loss-of-function variants in the target gene. However, our understanding of how gradual changes in gene dosage affect molecular, cellular, and organismal traits is currently limited. To address this gap, we induced gradual changes in gene expression of four genes using CRISPR activation and inactivation. Downstream transcriptional consequences of dosage modulation of three master trans-regulators associated with blood cell traits (GFI1B, NFE2, and MYB) were examined using targeted single-cell multimodal sequencing. We showed that guide tiling around the TSS is the most effective way to modulate cis gene expression across a wide range of fold-changes, with further effects from chromatin accessibility and histone marks that differ between the inhibition and activation systems. Our single-cell data allowed us to precisely detect subtle to large gene expression changes in dozens of trans genes, revealing that many responses to dosage changes of these three TFs are nonlinear, including non-monotonic behaviours, even when constraining the fold-changes of the master regulators to a copy number gain or loss. We found that the dosage properties are linked to gene constraint and that some of these nonlinear responses are enriched for disease and GWAS genes. Overall, our study provides a straightforward and scalable method to precisely modulate gene expression and gain insights into its downstream consequences at high resolution.

genomics↗

Specifying cellular context of transcription factor regulons for exploring context-specific gene regulation programs

Understanding the role of transcription and transcription factors in cellular identity and disease, such as cancer and autoimmunity, is essential. However, comprehensive data resources for cell line-specific transcription factor-to-target gene annotations are currently limited. To address this, we developed a straightforward method to define regulons that capture the cell-specific aspects of TF binding and transcript expression levels. By integrating cellular transcriptome and transcription factor binding data, we generated regulons for four common cell lines comprising both proximal and distal cell line-specific regulatory events. Through systematic benchmarking involving transcription factor knockout experiments, we demonstrated performance on par with state-of-the-art methods, with our method being easily applicable to other cell types of interest. We present case studies using three cancer single-cell datasets to showcase the utility of these cell-type-specific regulons in exploring transcriptional dysregulation. In summary, this study provides a valuable tool and a resource for systematically exploring cell line-specific transcriptional regulations, emphasizing the utility of network analysis in deciphering disease mechanisms.

bioinformatics↗

The impact of genetically controlled splicing on exon inclusion and protein structure

Common variants affecting mRNA splicing are typically identified though splicing quantitative trait locus (sQTL) mapping and have been shown to be enriched for GWAS signals by a similar degree to eQTLs. However, the specific splicing changes induced by these variants have been difficult to characterize, making it more complicated to analyze the effect size and direction of sQTLs, and to determine downstream splicing effects on protein structure. In this study, we catalogue sQTLs using exon percent spliced in (PSI) scores as a quantitative phenotype. PSI is an interpretable metric for identifying exon skipping events and has some advantages over other methods for quantifying splicing from short read RNA sequencing. In our set of sQTL variants, we find evidence of selective effects based on splicing effect size and effect direction, as well as exon symmetry. Additionally, we utilize AlphaFold2 to predict changes in protein structure associated with sQTLs overlapping GWAS traits, highlighting a potential new use-case for this technology for interpreting genetic effects on traits and disorders.

genomics↗