Biology subjects

Mills, G. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Mills, G. B..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Targeting mitochondria in cancer therapy could provide a basis for the selective anti-cancer activity

To determine the target of the recently identified lead compound NSC130362 that is responsible for its selective anti-cancer efficacy and safety in normal cells, structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies were conducted. First, NSC13062 was validated as a starting compound for the described SAR studies in a variety of cell-based viability assays. Then, a small library of 1,4-naphthoquinines (1,4-NQs) and quinoline-5,8-diones was tested in cell viability assays using pancreatic cancer MIA PaCa-2 cells and normal human hepatocytes. The obtained data allowed us to select a set of both non-toxic compounds that preferentially induced apoptosis in cancer cells and toxic compounds that induced apoptosis in both cancer and normal cells. Anti-cancer activity of the selected non-toxic compounds was confirmed in viability assays using breast cancer HCC1187 cells. Consequently, the two sets of compounds were tested in multiple cell-based and in vitro activity assays to identify key factors responsible for the observed activity. Inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transfer chain (ETC) is a key distinguishing activity between the non-toxic and toxic compounds. Finally, we developed a mathematical model that was able to distinguish these two sets of compounds. The development of this model supports our conclusion that appropriate quantitative SAR (QSAR) models have the potential to be employed to develop anticancer compounds with improved potency while maintaining non-toxicity to normal cells.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Suppression of p16 increases nucleotide synthesis via mTORC1

Reprogrammed metabolism and cell cycle dysregulation are two cancer hallmarks. p16 is a cell cycle inhibitor and tumor suppressor that is upregulated during oncogene-induced senescence (OIS). Loss of p16 allows for uninhibited cell cycle progression, bypass of OIS, and tumorigenesis. Whether p16 loss affects pro-tumorigenic metabolism is unclear. We report that suppression of p16 plays a central role in reprogramming metabolism by increasing nucleotide synthesis. This occurred via activation of mTORC1 signaling, which directly mediated increased translation of the mRNA encoding ribose-5-phosphate isomerase A (RPIA), a pentose phosphate pathway enzyme. p16 loss correlated with activation of the mTORC1-RPIA axis in multiple cancer types. Suppression of RPIA inhibited proliferation only in p16-low cells by inducing senescence both in vitro and in vivo. These data reveal the molecular basis whereby p16 loss modulates pro-tumorigenic metabolism through mTORC1-mediated upregulation of nucleotide synthesis and reveals a metabolic vulnerability of p16-null cancer cells.\n\nHighlightsO_LImTORC1 is activated by p16 knockdown to increase nucleotide synthesis and bypass senescence\nC_LIO_LImTORC1 directly increases translation RPIA to increase ribose-5-phosphate\nC_LIO_LIActivation of mTORC1 pathway downstream of p16 suppression is independent of RB\nC_LIO_LIRPIA suppression induces senescence only in cells and tumors with low p16\nC_LI

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2018

PARPi triggers STING-dependent immune response and enhances therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade independent of BRCAness

Poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have shown remarkable therapeutic efficacy against BRCA1/2 mutant cancers through a synthetic lethal interaction. PARPis are believed to exert their therapeutic effects mainly through the blockade of single-strand DNA damage repair, which leads to the accumulation of toxic DNA double strand breaks, specifically in cancer cells with DNA repair deficiency (BCRAness), including those harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Here, we show that PARPis modulate immune reposes, which contribute to their therapeutic effects independent of BRCA1/2 mutations. The mechanism underlying this PARPi-induced reprogramming of anti-tumor microenvironment involves a promoted accumulation of cytosolic DNA fragments due to unresolved DNA lesions. This in turn activates the DNA sensing cGAS-STING pathway and stimulates production of type I interferons. Ultimately, these events promote PARPi-induced antitumor immunity independent of BRCAness, which can be further enhanced by immune checkpoint blockade. Our results may provide a mechanistic rationale for using PARPis as immunomodulatory agents to harness therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Fallopian tube precursor lesions of serous ovarian carcinoma require L1CAM for dissemination and metastasis

Most high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) arise from Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma (STIC) lesions in the distal end of the fallopian tube (FT). FT secretory cells become malignant by accumulating genomic aberrations over 6-7 years before seeding the ovarian surface, with rapid tumor dissemination to other abdominal structures thereafter. It remains unclear how nascent malignant cells leave the FT to colonize the ovary. This report provides evidence that the L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) contributes to the ability of transformed FT secretory cells (FTSEC) to detach from the tube, survive under anchorage-independent conditions, and seed the ovarian surface. L1CAM was highly expressed on the apical surface of STIC lesions and contributed to ovarian colonization by upregulating integrin and fibronectin in malignant cells and activating the AKT and ERK pathways. These changes increased cell survival under ultra-low attachment conditions that mimic transit from the FT to the ovary. To study metastasis to the ovary, we developed a tumor-ovary co-culture model. We showed that L1CAM expression was important for FT cells to invade the ovary as a cohesive group. Our results indicate that in the early stages of HGSC development, transformed FTSECs disseminate from the FT to the ovary in L1CAM-dependent manner.\n\nThe authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists\n\nList of abbreviations

cancer biology↗