Biology subjects

Millin, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Millin, R..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Weaker neural suppression in autism

Increased neural excitation resulting from weakened inhibition is a leading hypothesis for the pathophysiology of autism. However, experimental support in humans remains equivocal. Alternatively, modulatory processes that suppress neural responses but do not specifically rely on inhibition may be impacted in ASD. Leveraging well-characterized suppressive neural circuits in the visual system, we used behavioral and fMRI tasks to demonstrate a significant reduction in neural suppression in young adults with ASD compared to neurotypical controls. We further tested the mechanism of this suppression by measuring levels of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA, and found no differences in GABA between groups. We show how a computational model that incorporates divisive normalization, as well as narrower top-down gain (that could result, for example, from a narrower window of attention), can explain our observations and divergent previous findings. Thus, weaker neural suppression in ASD may be attributable to differences in top-down processing, but not to differences in GABA levels.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Disrupted neural adaptation in autism spectrum disorder

There has been long-standing speculation that autism spectrum disorder (ASD) involves an increase in excitation relative to inhibition. However, there is little direct evidence of increased neural excitation in humans with ASD. Here we provide a potential explanation for this discrepancy: we show that increased neural excitation emerges only after repeated stimulation, manifesting as a deficit in neural adaptation. We measured fMRI responses induced by repeated audio-visual stimulation and button presses in early sensory-motor cortical areas. Across all cortical areas we show reduced adaptation in individuals with ASD compared to neurotypical individuals. The degree of adaptation is correlated between cortical areas and with button-press reaction times across subjects. These findings suggest that increased neural excitation in ASD, manifesting as dysregulated neural adaptation, is domain-general and behaviorally-relevant.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Glutamatergic facilitation of neural responses in MT enhances motion perception in humans

There is large individual variability in human neural responses and perceptual abilities. The factors that give rise to these individual differences, however, remain largely unknown. To examine these factors, we separately measured fMRI responses to moving gratings in the motion-selective region MT, and perceptual duration thresholds for motion direction discrimination within the same group of male and female subjects. Further, we acquired MR spectroscopy data that allowed us to quantify an index of neurotransmitter levels in the region surrounding MT. We show that individual differences in the Glx (glutamate + glutamine) signal in the MT region are associated with both higher fMRI responses and improved psychophysical task performance. Our results suggest that individual differences in baseline levels of glutamate within MT contribute to motion perception by increasing neural responses in this region.\n\nSignificanceWhat factors govern the relationship between neural activity and behavior? Our results suggest that one such factor is the level of glutamate, an excitatory neurotransmitter, within a particular region of cortex. By measuring an index of glutamate in vivo using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we show that human subjects with more glutamate in the visual motion area known as MT also have larger fMRI responses (an index of neural activity) in this region. Further, people with more glutamate in MT can accurately perceive moving images presented more briefly within a behavioral task. Our findings point to an important role for glutamate levels in determining the relationship between neural responses and behavior during visual motion perception.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Suppression and facilitation of human neural responses

Efficient neural processing depends on regulating responses through suppression and facilitation of neural activity. Utilizing a well-known visual motion paradigm that evokes behavioral suppression and facilitation, and combining 5 different methodologies (behavioral psychophysics, computational modeling, functional MRI, pharmacology, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy), we provide evidence that challenges commonly held assumptions about the neural processes underlying suppression and facilitation. We show that: 1) both suppression and facilitation can emerge from a single, computational principle - divisive normalization; there is no need to invoke separate neural mechanisms, 2) neural suppression and facilitation in the motion-selective area MT mirror perception, but strong suppression also occurs in earlier visual areas, and 3) suppression is not driven by GABA-mediated inhibition. Thus, while commonly used spatial suppression paradigms may provide insight into neural response magnitudes in visual areas, they cannot be used to infer neural inhibition.

neuroscience↗