Biology subjects

Miller, E. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Miller, E. C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Phylogenomics reveals the deep ocean as an accelerator for evolutionary diversification in anglerfishes

Colonization of a novel habitat is often followed by radiation in the wake of ecological opportunity. Alternatively, some habitats should be inherently more constraining than others if the challenges of that environment have few evolutionary solutions. We examined the push-and-pull of these factors on evolution following habitat transitions, using anglerfishes (Lophiiformes) as a model. Deep-sea fishes are notoriously difficult to study, and poor sampling has limited progress thus far. Here we present a new phylogeny of anglerfishes with unprecedented taxonomic sampling (1,092 loci and 40% of species), combined with three-dimensional phenotypic data from museum specimens obtained with micro-CT scanning. We use these datasets to examine the tempo and mode of phenotypic and lineage diversification using phylogenetic comparative methods, comparing lineages in shallow and deep benthic versus bathypelagic habitats. Our results show that anglerfishes represent a surprising case where the bathypelagic lineage has greater taxonomic and phenotypic diversity than coastal benthic relatives. This defies expectations based on ecological principles since the bathypelagic zone is the most homogeneous habitat on Earth. Deep-sea anglerfishes experienced rapid lineage diversification concomitant with colonization of the bathypelagic zone from a continental slope ancestor. They display the highest body, skull and jaw shape disparity across lophiiforms. In contrast, reef-associated taxa show strong constraints on shape and low evolutionary rates, contradicting patterns suggested by other shallow marine fishes. We found that Lophiiformes as a whole evolved under an early burst model with subclades occupying distinct body shapes. We further discuss to what extent the bathypelagic clade is a secondary adaptive radiation, or if its diversity can be explained by non-adaptive processes.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Historical biogeography supports Point Conception as the site of turnover between temperate East Pacific ichthyofaunas

The northern and southern marine faunas of the temperate Northeastern Pacific meet within California as part of one of the few eastern boundary upwelling ecosystems of the world. Traditionally, it is believed that Point Conception is the precise site of turnover between these two faunas due to sharp changes in oceanographic conditions. However, evidence from intraspecific phylogeography and species range terminals do not support this view, finding stronger biogeographic breaks elsewhere along the coast. Here I develop a new application of historical biogeographic approaches to uncover sites of transition between faunas without needing an a priori hypothesis of where these occur. I used this approach to determine whether the point of transition between northern and southern temperate faunas occurs at Point Conception or elsewhere within California. I also take advantage of expert-vetted latitudinal range data of California fish species from the 1970s and the 2020s to assess how biogeography could change with the backdrop of climate change. The site of turnover was found to occur near Point Conception, in concordance with the traditional view. I suggest that recent species- and population-level processes such as dispersal and speciation could be expected to give signals of different events from historical biogeography, possibly explaining the discrepancy across studies. Species richness of California has increased since the 1970s, mostly due to new species from Baja California. Range shifts under warming conditions will have the consequence of increasing the disparity between northern and southern faunas of California, creating a more divergent biogeography.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Comparing speciation rates in lakes, rivers, and the sea

The diversity of species inhabiting freshwater relative to marine habitats is striking, given that freshwater habitats encompass <1% of Earths water. The most commonly proposed explanation for this pattern is that freshwater habitats are more fragmented than marine habitats, allowing more opportunities for allopatric speciation and thus increased diversification rates in freshwater. However, speciation may be generally faster in sympatry than in allopatry, as illustrated by lacustrine radiations such as African cichlids. Differences between rivers and lakes may be important to consider when comparing diversification broadly among freshwater and marine lineages. Here I compared diversification rates of teleost fishes in marine, riverine and lacustrine habitats. I found that lakes had faster speciation and net diversification rates than other aquatic habitats. However, most freshwater diversity arose in rivers. Surprisingly, riverine and marine habitats had similar rates of net diversification. Biogeographic models suggest that lacustrine habitats are evolutionary unstable, explaining the dearth of lacustrine species in spite of their rapid diversification. Collectively, these results suggest that diversification rate differences are unlikely to explain the freshwater paradox. Instead, this pattern may be attributable to the comparable amount of time spent in riverine and marine habitats over the 200-million-year history of teleosts.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Evolutionary time explains the global distribution of freshwater fish diversity

AimThe evolutionary causes of the latitudinal diversity gradient are debated. Hypotheses have ultimately invoked either faster rates of diversification in the tropics, or more time for diversification due to the tropical origins of higher taxa. Here we perform the first test of the diversification rate and time hypotheses in freshwater ray-finned fishes, a group comprising nearly a quarter of all living vertebrates. LocationGlobal. Time period368-0 mya. Major taxa studiedExtant freshwater ray-finned fishes. MethodsUsing a mega-phylogeny of actinopterygian fishes and a global database of occurrence records, we estimated net diversification rates, the number of colonizations and regional colonization times of co-occurring species in freshwater drainage basins. We used Generalized Additive Models to test whether these factors were related to latitude. We then compared the influence of diversification rates, colonization numbers, colonization times and surface area on species richness, and how these factors are related to each other. ResultsWhile both diversification rates and time were related to richness, time had greater explanatory power and was more strongly related to latitude than diversification rates. Other factors (basin surface area, number of colonizations) also helped explain richness but were unrelated to latitude. The worlds most diverse freshwater basins (Amazon, Congo rivers) were dominated by lineages with Mesozoic origins. The temperate groups dominant today arrived near the K-Pg boundary, leaving comparatively less time to build richness. Diversification rates and colonization times were inversely related: recently colonized basins had the fastest rates, while ancient species-rich faunas had slower rates. Main conclusionsWe concluded that time is the lead driver of latitudinal richness disparities in freshwater fish faunas. We suggest that the most likely path to building very high species richness is through diversification over long periods of time, rather than diversifying quickly.

evolutionary biology↗