Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Millar, P. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Millar, P. R..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Biomarker Variability Limits Individualized Amyloid Time Estimation in Alzheimer Disease

ObjectiveDisease progression modeling (DPM) or "amyloid time" is increasingly used to stage Alzheimer disease (AD). DPM performance depends on within-individual heterogeneity in rates of pathological accumulation as well as test-retest reliability of the biomarker. The relative contributions of these variabilities have not been systematically assessed. This would be particularly relevant if extrapolations from DPM were to be used to make individual-level predictions for research, clinical trials, or potentially future clinical practice. MethodsWe conducted simulation studies incorporating empirically-derived noise properties from amyloid biomarkers to assess the contributions of inter- and intra-individual variability. Findings generalized in an autosomal dominant AD cohort with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma biomarkers and in a sporadic AD cohort with both amyloid PET and plasma biomarkers. We assessed group level DPM performance via mean average error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). At the individual level, we evaluated distinctness of distributions of biomarker levels associated with specific disease timings. ResultsInter-individual variability was the dominant source of error in temporal estimates. Intra-individual variability reduced estimate stability. Optimal performance occurred in biomarkers with positive average accumulation rates where a subset of individuals had exceptionally high levels of accumulation. In research study data, amyloid PET outperformed CSF and plasma biomarkers. InterpretationDPM is fundamentally constrained by dynamic range, variability, and test-retest reliability of the biomarker of interest. Current DPM approaches are more robust at the group level, particularly when applied to biomarkers with more than 10-15% variability like fluid biomarkers. FundingNational Institute on Aging, Alzheimers Association, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Korean Ministry of Health & Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT, Spanish Institute of Health.

bioinformatics↗

History of Traumatic Brain Injury with Loss of Consciousness and APOE ϵ4 Carriers Synergistically Increase Late-Life Amyloid PET Burden

BackgroundTraumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (TBI-LOC) is an established risk factor for dementia, yet the pathways linking remote TBI to Alzheimers disease (AD) biology remain incompletely defined. APOE {varepsilon}4 is the strongest genetic predictor of amyloid accumulation in late-onset AD, it may moderate the long-term consequences of head injury. This study investigates whether history TBI-LOC independently contributes or synergistically interacts with APOE {varepsilon}4 to amplify late-life amyloid and tau burden. Methods429 participants completed the Ohio State University TBI screening tool and an amyloid PET scan (centiloids). A subcohort (n=352) also underwent tau PET. TBI history was classified by recency (<10 vs >10 years) and severity (no TBI, dazing/confusion [TBI-DZ], TBI-LOC). Analyses were stratified by degree of clinical impairment as assessed by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR=0 vs CDR>0). Logistic and linear regression models examined associations between TBI and amyloid, adjusting for age, sex, education, and APOE {varepsilon}4, including an APOE*TBI-LOC status interaction term, while Fishers exact tests evaluated TBI recency and biomarker positivity. ResultsIn CDR=0 participants (n=365), 119 reported a history of TBI, comprising 56 TBI-DZ and 63 TBI-LOC. TBI-LOC but not TBI-DZ, correlated with elevated amyloid PET levels (p<0.001; [4.6-17]). Furthermore, an interaction between APOE {varepsilon}4 and TBI-LOC indicated that TBI-LOC augmented the amyloid-related risk associated with the APOE {varepsilon}4 allele (p=0.003; [4.3-21]). The interaction persisted when stratified by TBI recency with only remote TBI-LOC (occurring more than 10 years prior) associated with increased amyloid PET (p=0.003 [5.2-25]). No association between TBI and tau was identified in a subset with tau PET, and no TBI-amyloid correlations were observed among symptomatic participants (CDR>0; n=64) suggesting a ceiling effect of pathology once clinical dementia is present. ConclusionsHistory of remote TBI-LOC is linked to elevated amyloid PET levels in later life, particularly among APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers with a CDR=0. The robust findings for amyloid, contrasted with null tau results and the reduced association in symptomatic cases underscore the importance of considering TBI history when screening for preclinical AD and assessing early-stage risk.

neuroscience↗

Increasing hub disruption parallels dementia severity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease

Hub regions in the brain, recognized for their roles in ensuring efficient information transfer, are vulnerable to pathological alterations in neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer Disease (AD). Given their essential role in neural communication, disruptions to these hubs have profound implications for overall brain network integrity and functionality. Hub disruption, or targeted impairment of functional connectivity at the hubs, is recognized in AD patients. Computational models paired with evidence from animal experiments hint at a mechanistic explanation, suggesting that these hubs may be preferentially targeted in neurodegeneration, due to their high neuronal activity levels--a phenomenon termed "activity-dependent degeneration". Yet, two critical issues were unresolved. First, past research hasnt definitively shown whether hub regions face a higher likelihood of impairment (targeted attack) compared to other regions or if impairment likelihood is uniformly distributed (random attack). Second, human studies offering support for activity-dependent explanations remain scarce. We applied a refined hub disruption index to determine the presence of targeted attacks in AD. Furthermore, we explored potential evidence for activity-dependent degeneration by evaluating if hub vulnerability is better explained by global connectivity or connectivity variations across functional systems, as well as comparing its timing relative to amyloid beta deposition in the brain. Our unique cohort of participants with autosomal dominant Alzheimer Disease (ADAD) allowed us to probe into the preclinical stages of AD to determine the hub disruption timeline in relation to expected symptom emergence. Our findings reveal a hub disruption pattern in ADAD aligned with targeted attacks, detectable even in pre-clinical stages. Notably, the disruptions severity amplified alongside symptomatic progression. Moreover, since excessive local neuronal activity has been shown to increase amyloid deposition and high connectivity regions show high level of neuronal activity, our observation that hub disruption was primarily tied to regional differences in global connectivity and sequentially followed changes observed in A{beta} PET cortical markers is consistent with the activity-dependent degeneration model. Intriguingly, these disruptions were discernible 8 years before the expected age of symptom onset. Taken together, our findings not only align with the targeted attack on hubs model but also suggest that activity-dependent degeneration might be the cause of hub vulnerability. This deepened understanding could be instrumental in refining diagnostic techniques and developing targeted therapeutic strategies for AD in the future.

neuroscience↗

Multimodal brain age estimates relate to Alzheimer disease biomarkers and cognition in early stages: a cross-sectional observational study

BackgroundEstimates of "brain-predicted age" quantify apparent brain age compared to normative trajectories of neuroimaging features. The brain age gap (BAG) between predicted and chronological age is elevated in symptomatic Alzheimer disease (AD), but has not been well explored in preclinical AD. Prior studies have typically modeled BAG with structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but more recently other modalities, including functional connectivity (FC) and multimodal MRI, have been explored. MethodsWe trained three models to predict age from FC, volumetric (Vol), or multimodal MRI (Vol+FC) in 390 control participants (18-89 years old). In independent samples of 144 older adult controls, 154 preclinical AD participants, and 154 cognitively impaired (CI; CDR > 0) participants, we tested relationships between BAG and AD biomarkers of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration, as well as a global cognitive composite. ResultsAll models predicted age in the control training set, with the multimodal model outperforming the unimodal models. All three BAG estimates were significantly elevated in CI compared to controls. FC-BAG and Vol+FC-BAG were marginally reduced in preclinical AD participants compared to controls. In CI participants only, elevated Vol-BAG and Vol+FC-BAG were associated with more advanced AD pathology and lower cognitive performance. ConclusionsBoth FC-BAG and Vol-BAG are elevated in CI participants. However, FC and volumetric MRI also capture complementary signals. Specifically, FC-BAG may capture a unique biphasic response to preclinical AD pathology, while Vol-BAG may capture pathological progression and cognitive decline in the symptomatic stage. A multimodal age-prediction model captures these modality-specific patterns, and further, improves sensitivity to healthy age differences. FundingThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (P01-AG026276, P01-AG03991, P30-AG066444, 5-R01-AG052550, 5-R01-AG057680, 1-R01-AG067505, 1S10RR022984-01A1, U19-AG032438), the BrightFocus Foundation (A2022014F), and the Alzheimers Association (SG-20-690363-DIAN).

neuroscience↗

Neuroimaging within the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network (DIAN): PET and MRI

The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) Observational Study is an international collaboration studying autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD). This rare form of Alzheimer disease (AD) is caused by mutations in the presenilin 1 (PSEN1), presenilin 2 (PSEN2), or amyloid precursor protein (APP) genes. As individuals from these families have a 50% chance of inheriting the familial mutation, this provides researchers with a well-matched cohort of carriers vs non-carriers for case-control studies. An important trait of ADAD is that the age at symptom onset is highly predictable and consistent for each specific mutation, allowing researchers to estimate an individuals point in their disease time course prior to symptom onset. Although ADAD represents only a small proportion (approximately 0.1%) of all AD cases, studying this form of AD allows researchers to investigate preclinical AD and the progression of changes that occur within the brain prior to AD symptom onset. Furthermore, the young age at symptom onset (typically 30-60 years) means age-related comorbidities are much less prevalent than in sporadic AD, thereby allowing AD pathophysiology to be studied independent of these confounds. A major goal of the DIAN Observational Study is to create a global resource for AD researchers. To that end, the current manuscript provides an overview of the DIAN magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) protocols and highlights the key imaging results of this study to date.

neuroscience↗

Wakeful rest benefits memory when materials can be rehearsed

Wakeful rest is a brief (e.g., 10 minutes), quiet period of minimal stimulation, which has been shown to facilitate memory performance, compared to a distractor task. Researchers have argued that this benefit is driven by automatic consolidation during the wakeful rest period. However, prior studies have not fully ruled out a controlled rehearsal mechanism, which might also occur during wakeful rest. In the current study, we attempted to replicate the wakeful rest effect under conditions that more strictly limit the possibility of rehearsal. Across six experiments, we manipulated parameters of a standard wakeful rest paradigm, including the type of target materials (word lists or abstract shapes), intentionality of encoding (incidental or intentional), and final retrieval delay (immediate or delayed). Additionally, we tested both younger and older adults to test whether these effects are consistent across the adult lifespan. Importantly, we observed the expected wakeful rest memory benefit in recall for verbal targets, which are easily rehearseable, but not for abstract shapes, which cannot be readily rehearsed. This pattern occurred in both younger and older adults. These results place constraints on the generalizability of wakeful rest memory benefits and suggest that the effect may be at least partly driven by rehearsal processes, rather than an automatic consolidation process.

animal behavior and cognition↗