Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Meyer, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Meyer, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A computational model of task allocation in social insects: ecology and interactions alone can drive specialisation

Social insect colonies are capable of allocating their workforce in a decentralised fashion; addressing a variety of tasks and responding effectively to changes in the environment. This process is fundamental to their ecological success, but the mechanisms behind it remain poorly understood. While most models focus on internal and individual factors, empirical evidence highlights the importance of ecology and social interactions. To address this gap we propose a game theoretical model of task allocation. Individuals are characterised by a trait that determines how they split their energy between two prototypical tasks: foraging and regulation. To be viable, a colony needs to learn to adequately allocate its workforce between these two tasks. We study two different processes: individuals can learn relying exclusively on their own experience, or by using the experiences of others via social learning. We find that social organisation can be determined by the ecology alone, irrespective of interaction details. Weakly specialised colonies in which all individuals tend to both tasks emerge when foraging is cheap; harsher environments, on the other hand, lead to strongly specialised colonies in which each individual fully engages in a single task. We compare the outcomes of self-organised task allocation with optimal group performance. Counter to intuition, strongly specialised colonies perform suboptimally, whereas the group performance of weakly specialised colonies is closer to optimal. Social interactions lead to important differences when the colony deals with dynamic environments. Colonies whose individuals rely on their own experience are more exible when dealing with change. Our computational model is aligned with mathematical predictions in tractable limits. This different kind of model is useful in framing relevant and important empirical questions, where ecology and interactions are key elements of hypotheses and predictions.

ecology

Excitability regulation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex during sustained instructed fear responses: a TMS-EEG study

BackgroundThreat detection is essential for protecting individuals from precarious situations. Early studies suggested a network of amygdala, limbic regions and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) involved in fear processing. Excitability regulation in the dmPFC might be crucial for physiological fear processing, while an abnormal excitability pattern could lead to mental illness. Non-invasive paradigms to measure excitability regulation during fear processing in humans are missing.\n\nMethodsWe adapted an experimental approach of excitability characterization using electroencephalography (EEG) recordings and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the dmPFC during an instructed fear paradigm to dynamically dissect its role in fear processing. Event-related (ERP) and TMS-evoked potentials (TEP) were analyzed to trace dmPFC excitability in healthy young volunteers (n = 40, age = 27.6 {+/-} 5.7 years, 22 females). Moreover, we linked the excitability regulation patterns to individual structural MRI-derived properties of gray matter microstructural integrity of the fear network.\n\nResultsAn increased cortical excitability was demonstrated in the threat (T) condition in comparison to no-threat (NT) as showed by increased amplitude of evoked potentials. Furthermore, TMS over the dmPFC induced markedly increased evoked responses during T condition in relation to NT. Moreover, we found that the structural integrity of the dmPFC and the amygdala predict excitability regulation patterns as measured by ERP and TEP during fear processing.\n\nConclusionsWe describe the dynamic range of excitability regulation in dmPFC during fear processing. The applied paradigm can be used to non-invasively track response abnormalities to threat stimuli in healthy subjects or patients with mental disorders.

neuroscience