Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Metz, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Metz, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Drone honey bees (Apis mellifera) are disproportionately sensitive to abiotic stressors despite expressing high levels of stress response proteins

Drone honey bees (haploid males) are the obligate sexual partners of queens, and the availability of healthy, high-quality drones directly affects a queens fecundity and productivity of her subsequent colony. Yet, our understanding of how stressors affect drone fecundity and physiology is presently limited. We investigated sex biases in susceptibility to abiotic stressors (cold stress, topical imidacloprid exposure, and topical exposure to a realistic cocktail of pesticides), and we found that drones were more sensitive to cold and imidacloprid exposure but the cocktail was not toxic at the concentrations tested. We corroborated this lack of apparent toxicity with in-hive cocktail exposures via pollen feeding. We then used quantitative proteomics to investigate protein expression profiles in the hemolymph of topically exposed workers and drones, and we show that drones express surprisingly high levels of putative stress response proteins relative to workers. Drones apparently invest in strong constitutive expression of damage-mitigating proteins for a wide range of stressors, yet they are still sensitive to stress when challenged. The robust expression of stress-response proteins suggests that drone stress tolerance systems are fundamentally rewired relative to workers, and their susceptibility to stress depends on more than simply gene dose or deleterious recessive alleles.

cell biology↗

Honey bee queen health is unaffected by contact exposure to pesticides commonly found in beeswax

Honey bee queen health is crucial for colony health and productivity, and pesticides have been previously associated with queen loss and premature supersedure. Prior research has investigated the effects of indirect pesticide exposure on queens via workers, as well as direct effects on queens during development. However, as adults, queens are in constant contact with wax as they walk on comb and lay eggs; therefore, direct pesticide contact with adult queens is a relevant but seldom investigated exposure route. Here, we conducted laboratory and field experiments to investigate the impacts of topical pesticide exposure on adult queens. We tested dose-response relationships of six pesticides commonly found in wax: coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, atrazine, 2,4-DMPF, chlorpyriphos, chlorothalonil, and a cocktail of all six, each dosed up to 32 times the concentrations typically found in wax. We found no effect of any treatment on queen mass or sperm viability. Furthermore, none of the 1,568 proteins quantified in the queens fat bodies (a major site of detoxification enzyme production) were differentially expressed. In a field trial with N = 30 queens exposed to either a handling control, a solvent control, or a pesticide cocktail, we again found no impact on queen egg-laying pattern, mass, or emergence mass of daughter workers. Further, of the 3,127 proteins identified in fluid from the spermatheca (sperm storage organ), none were differentially expressed. These experiments consistently show that at realistic exposure levels, pesticides commonly found in wax have no direct impact on queen performance, reproduction, or quality metrics. We suggest that previously reported associations between high levels of pesticide residues in wax and queen failure are most likely driven by indirect effects of worker exposure (either through wax or other hive products) on queen care or queen perception.

pharmacology and toxicology↗