Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mendall, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Mendall, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Microbiome diversity of low biomass skin sites is captured by metagenomics but not 16S amplicon sequencing

Established workflows for microbiome analysis work well for high microbial biomass samples, like stool, but often fail to accurately define microbial communities when applied to low microbial biomass samples. Here, we systemically compare microbiome analysis methods --16S rRNA sequencing, shallow metagenomics, and qPCR PMP panels--as well as extraction methods across skin swab samples and mock community dilutions. While extraction method minimally impacted results, with no significant signal for method-specific contamination or bias, we observed critical differences in inferred composition across analysis methods for low biomass samples. Metagenomic sequencing and qPCR revealed concordant, diverse microbial communities on low biomass leg skin samples, whereas 16S amplicon sequencing exhibited extreme bias toward the most abundant taxon. Both qPCR and metagenomics showed that female genital tract bacteria dominated the leg skin microbiome in about half of female subjects. Metagenomics also enabled sub-species analysis, which demonstrated that individuals have consistent within-species diversity across high-biomass forehead and low-biomass leg skin sites. This work illustrates that shallow metagenomics provides the necessary sensitivity and taxonomic resolution to characterize species and strain-level diversity in extremely low biomass samples, opening possibilities for microbiome discovery in previously unexplored niches. ImportanceDespite the importance of the skin microbiome in health and disease, there have been far fewer studies characterizing the microbiome of skin compared to that of the gut. In part, this is because microbiome methods were initially developed for bacteria-rich samples like stool and these methods perform poorly on bacteria-poor samples like skin swabs. The perceived difficulty of getting reliable data from such low biomass sites has limited the scope and types of analyses performed. Here we demonstrate that shotgun, whole-genome, metagenomic sequencing recovers the full input from even very dilute control community samples, and reveals a highly diverse population even on very low biomass skin sites. We describe a streamlined sample processing and analysis pipeline which can be applied broadly to characterize low biomass microbiome samples and reveal new host-microbiome interactions.

microbiology↗

The microbiome of the human facial skin is unique compared to that of other hominids

The human facial skin microbiome is remarkably similar across all people sampled to date, dominated by facultative anaerobe Cutibacterium. The origin of this genus is unknown, with no close relatives currently described from samples of primate skin. This apparent human-specific bacterial taxon could reflect the unique nature of human skin, which is significantly more oily than that of our closest primate relatives. However, previous studies have not sampled the facial skin microbiome of our closest primates. Here, we profiled the skin microbiome of zoo-housed chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), alongside their human care staff, using both 16S and shotgun sequencing. We showed that facial skin microbiomes differ significantly across host species, with humans having the lowest diversity and most unique community among the three species. We were unable to find a close relative of Cutibacterium on either chimpanzee or gorilla facial skin, consistent with human-specificity. Hominid skin microbiome functional profiles were more functionally similar compared to their taxonomic profiles. However, we still found notable functional differences including lower proportions of fatty acid biosynthesis on humans, consistent with microbes reliance on host-derived lipids. Our study highlights the uniqueness of the human facial skin microbiome and supports a horizontal acquisition of its dominant resident from a yet unknown source. ImportanceUnderstanding how and why human skin bacteria differ from our closest animal relatives provides crucial insights into human evolution and health. While we have known that human facial skin hosts distinct bacteria--particularly Cutibacterium acnes--we did not know if these bacteria and their associated genes were also present on the faces of our closest relatives, chimpanzees and gorillas. Our study shows that human facial skin hosts markedly different bacteria than other primates, with C. acnes being uniquely abundant on human faces. This finding suggests that this key bacterial species may have adapted specifically to human skin, which produces more oils than other primates.

microbiology↗