Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Meis, J. F.

Publications and source records attributed to Meis, J. F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Antifungal susceptibility profile of clinically relevant species of the genus Sporothrix: establishment of Epidemiological Cutoff Values (ECVs) according to CLSI broth microdilution methodology

Sporotrichosis is a globally distributed subcutaneous mycosis caused mainly by Sporothrix brasiliensis, S. schenckii, and S. globosa. Cat-transmitted sporotrichosis, primarily caused by S. brasiliensis in South America and to a lesser extent by S. schenckii in Southeast Asia, is emerging as a significant public health concern, due its outbreak potential. Itraconazole is the first-choice drug for treatment of human and cats, but reduced susceptibility has been reported based on previously proposed epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs). To support resistance surveillance, we aimed to establish CLSI-endorsed ECVs for these clinically relevant Sporothrix species. A total of 3,588 minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for seven antifungal agents (amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, isavuconazole, olorofim, and terbinafine) were obtained from 19 international laboratories. Four of seven antifungals met the CLSI M57 guidelines criteria to determine the ECV. Established ECVs for amphotericin B were found to be high with 8 {micro}g/mL for S. brasiliensis and S. globosa, and 4 {micro}g/mL for S. schenckii. Itraconazole ECVs were 4 {micro}g/mL for S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii. Posaconazole ECVs were 4 {micro}g/mL for all three species (tentative for S. globosa), while the terbinafine ECV for S. brasiliensis was 0.12 {micro}g/mL. Olorofim demonstrated good in vitro activity, particularly against S. brasiliensis. Overall, this study establishes validated ECVs for key antifungals against Sporothrix species and identifies a low prevalence of non-wild type (NWT) isolates, supporting ongoing antifungal resistance monitoring.

microbiology↗

The contribution of genetic variation of Streptococcus pneumoniae to the clinical manifestation of invasive pneumococcal disease

BackgroundDifferent clinical manifestations of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) have thus far mainly been explained by patient characteristics. Here we studied the contribution of pneumococcal genetic variation to IPD phenotype.\n\nMethodsThe index cohort consisted of 349 patients admitted to two Dutch hospitals between 2000-2011 with pneumococcal bacteraemia. We performed genome-wide association studies to identify pneumococcal lineages, genes and allelic variants associated with 23 clinical IPD phenotypes. The identified associations were validated in a nationwide (n=482) and a post-pneumococcal vaccination cohort (n=121). The contribution of confirmed pneumococcal genotypes to the clinical IPD phenotype, relative to known clinical predictors, was tested by regression analysis.\n\nFindingsThe presence of pneumococcal gene slaA was a nationwide confirmed independent predictor of meningitis (OR=10.5, p=0.001), as was sequence cluster 9 (OR=3.68, p=0.057). A set of 4 pneumococcal genes co-located on a prophage was a confirmed independent predictor of 30-day mortality (OR=3.4, p=0.003). We could detect the pneumococcal variants of concern in these patients blood samples by molecular amplification. In the post-vaccination cohort where the distribution of both patient characteristics and pneumococcal serotypes had changed, the relative importance of the prophage was no longer supported.\n\nInterpretationKnowledge of pneumococcal genotypic variants improved our clinical risk assessment for detrimental manifestations of IPD. This provides us with novel opportunities to target, anticipate or avert the pathogenic effects that are related to particular pneumococcal variants. Therefore, future diagnostics should facilitate prompt appreciation of pathogen diversity in clinical sepsis management. Ongoing surveillance is warranted to monitor the clinical value of information on pathogen variants in dynamic microbial and susceptible host populations.\n\nFundingNone.

microbiology↗