Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mefford, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Mefford, J..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

A Scalable Adaptive Quadratic Kernel Method for Interpretable Epistasis Analysis in Complex Traits

Our knowledge of the contribution of genetic interactions (epistasis) to variation in human complex traits remains limited, partly due to the lack of efficient, powerful, and interpretable algorithms to detect interactions. Recently proposed approaches for set-based association tests show promise in improving power to detect epistasis by examining the aggregated effects of multiple variants. Nevertheless, these methods either do not scale to large numbers of individuals available in Biobank datasets or do not provide interpretable results. We, therefore, propose QuadKAST, a scalable algorithm focused on testing pairwise interaction effects (also termed as quadratic effects) of a set of genetic variants on a trait and quantifying the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by these effects. We performed comprehensive simulations and demonstrated that QuadKAST is well-calibrated. Additionally, QuadKAST is highly sensitive in detecting loci with epistatic signal and accurate in its estimation of quadratic effects. We applied QuadKAST to 53 quantitative phenotypes measured in {approx} 300, 000 unrelated white British individuals in the UK Biobank to test for quadratic effects within each of 9, 515 protein-coding genes (after accounting for linear additive effects). We detected 32 trait-gene pairs across 17 traits that demonstrate statistically significant signals of quadratic effects ([Formula] accounting for the number of genes and traits tested). Our method enables the detailed investigation of epistasis on a large scale, offering new insights into its role and importance.

genetics↗

Complementation testing identifies causal genes at quantitative trait loci underlying fear related behavior

Knowing the genes involved in quantitative traits provides a critical entry point to understanding the biological bases of behavior, but there are very few examples where the pathway from genetic locus to behavioral change is known. Here we address a key step towards that goal by deploying a test that directly queries whether a gene mediates the effect of a quantitative trait locus (QTL). To explore the role of specific genes in fear behavior, we mapped three fear-related traits, tested fourteen genes at six QTLs, and identified six genes. Four genes, Lsamp, Ptprd, Nptx2 and Sh3gl, have known roles in synapse function; the fifth gene, Psip1, is a transcriptional co-activator not previously implicated in behavior; the sixth is a long non-coding RNA 4933413L06Rik with no known function. Single nucleus transcriptomic and epigenetic analyses implicated excitatory neurons as likely mediating the genetic effects. Surprisingly, variation in transcriptome and epigenetic modalities between inbred strains occurred preferentially in excitatory neurons, suggesting that genetic variation is more permissible in excitatory than inhibitory neuronal circuits. Our results open a bottleneck in using genetic mapping of QTLs to find novel biology underlying behavior and prompt a reconsideration of expected relationships between genetic and functional variation.

genetics↗

On the cross-population portability of gene expression prediction models

The genetic control of gene expression is a core component of human physiology. For the past several years, transcriptome-wide association studies have leveraged large datasets of linked genotype and RNA sequencing information to create a powerful gene-based test of association that has been used in dozens of studies. While numerous discoveries have been made, the populations in the training data are overwhelmingly of European descent, and little is known about the generalizability of these models to other populations. Here, we test for cross-population generalizability of gene expression prediction models using a dataset of African American individuals with RNA-Seq data in whole blood. We find that the default models trained in large datasets such as GTEx and DGN fare poorly in African Americans, with a notable reduction in prediction accuracy when compared to European Americans. We replicate these limitations in cross-population generalizability using the five populations in the GEUVADIS dataset. Via realistic simulations of both populations and gene expression, we show that accurate cross-population generalizability of transcriptome prediction only arises when eQTL architecture is substantially shared across populations. In contrast, models with non-identical eQTLs showed patterns similar to real-world data. Therefore, generating RNA-Seq data in diverse populations is a critical step towards multi-ethnic utility of gene expression prediction. Author summaryAdvances in RNA sequencing technology have reduced the cost of measuring gene expression at a genome-wide level. However, sequencing enough human RNA samples for adequately-powered disease association studies remains prohibitively costly. To this end, modern transcriptome-wide association analysis tools leverage existing paired genotype-expression datasets by creating models to predict gene expression using genotypes. These predictive models enable researchers to perform cost-effective association tests with gene expression in independently genotyped samples. However, most of these models use European reference data, and the extent to which gene expression prediction models work across populations is not fully resolved. We observe that these models predict gene expression worse than expected in a dataset of African-Americans when derived from European-descent individuals. Using simulations, we show that gene expression predictive model performance depends on both the amount of shared genotype predictors as well as the genetic relatedness between populations. Our findings suggest a need to carefully select reference populations for prediction and point to a pressing need for more genetically diverse genotype-expression datasets.

genomics↗

A comprehensive study of metabolite genetics reveals strong pleiotropy and heterogeneity across time and context

Genetic studies of metabolites have identified thousands of variants many of which are associated with downstream metabolic and obesogenic disorders. However, these studies have relied on univariate analyses, reducing power and limiting context specific understanding. Here we aim to provide an integrated perspective of the genetic basis of metabolites by leveraging the Finnish Metabolic Syndrome In Men (METSIM) cohort, a unique genetic resource which contains metabolic measurements across distinct timepoints as well as detailed information on statin usage. We increase effective sample size by an average of two-fold by applying the Covariates for Multi-phenotype Studies (CMS) approach, identifying 588 significant SNP-metabolite associations, including 248 novel associations. We further show that many of these SNPs are master metabolic regulators, balancing the relative proportion of dozens of metabolite levels. We then identify the first associations to changes in metabolic levels across time as well as evidence of genetic interaction with statin use. Finally, we show an overall decrease in genetic control of metabolic processes with age.

genetics↗

Adjusting For Principal Components Of Molecular Phenotypes Induces Replicating False Positives

High-throughput measurements of molecular phenotypes provide an unprecedented opportunity to model cellular processes and their impact on disease. Such highly-structured data is strongly confounded, and principal components and their variants reliably estimate latent confounders. Conditioning on PCs in downstream analyses is known to improve power and reduce multiple-testing miscalibration and is an indispensable element of thousands of published functional genomic analyses. Further clarifying this approach is of fundamental interest to the genomics and statistics communities. We uncover a novel bias induced by PC conditioning and provide an analytic, deterministic and intuitive approximation. The bias exists because PCs are, roughly, unshielded colliders on a causal path: because PCs partially incorporate a causal genotype effect on one phenotype, the genotype becomes correlated with every phenotype conditional on PCs. We empirically quantify this bias in realistic simulations. For small genetic effects, a nearly negligible bias is observed for all tested PC variants. For large genetic effects, or other differential covariates, dramatic false positives can arise. Though one PC variant (supervised SVA) largely avoids this bias, it is computationally prohibitive genome-wide; further, its immunity to this bias is novel. Our analysis informs best practices for confounder correction in genomic studies.

genetics↗