Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

McIntyre, L.

Publications and source records attributed to McIntyre, L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Human Auditory Ossicles as an Alternative Optimal Source of Ancient DNA

DNA recovery from ancient human remains has revolutionized our ability to reconstruct the genetic landscape of the past. Ancient DNA research has benefited from the identification of skeletal elements, such as the cochlear part of the osseous inner ear, that provide optimal contexts for DNA preservation; however, the rich genetic information obtained from the cochlea must be counterbalanced against the loss of valuable morphological information caused by its sampling. Motivated by similarities in developmental processes and histological properties between the cochlea and auditory ossicles, we evaluated the efficacy of ossicles as an alternative source of ancient DNA. We demonstrate that ossicles perform comparably to the cochlea in terms of DNA recovery, finding no substantial reduction in data quality, quantity, or authenticity across a range of preservation conditions. Ossicles can be sampled from intact skulls or disarticulated petrous bones without damage to surrounding bone, and we argue that, when available, they should be selected over the cochlea to reduce damage to skeletal integrity. These results identify a second optimal skeletal element for ancient DNA analysis and add to a growing toolkit of sampling methods that help to better preserve skeletal remains for future research while maximizing the likelihood that ancient DNA analysis will produce useable results.

genomics

Experimental design for large scale omic studies

Molecular phenotyping has expanded from small sample sizes to larger complex studies and are now a common element in genetic studies. When large scale studies add a molecular phenotyping component, balancing omics batches for the factors of interest (e.g. treatment), regardless of the initial sample collection strategy always improves power. Where possible, confounding sources of experimental error that are not of interest (sample collection blocks and data collection plates) improves power as does planning batches for molecular phenotyping based on constraints during initial sample collection. Power for testing differences in molecular phenotypes is always higher when accounting for the entire experimental design during modeling. The inclusion of metadata that tracks sources variation is critical to our shared goals of enabling reproducible research.

genetics