Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

McHaney, J. R.

Publications and source records attributed to McHaney, J. R..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Neurophysiological Evidence for Reduced Use of Prior Sound Patterns to Shape Speech Processing in Autism

Reported perceptual differences in autism may arise from reduced use of prior context to shape incoming sensory input. Speech perception provides a critical test of this account because stable perception requires listeners to integrate variable acoustic signals with contextual expectations. This study examined context-dependent modulation of speech encoding in autistic and non-autistic adults using the frequency-following response (FFR), a neurophysiological measure of phase-locked auditory encoding. Participants heard English intonational pitch contours presented in repetitive and variable contexts while EEG was recorded. Principal component analysis of FFR metrics yielded components indexing neural encoding fidelity and timing. Non-autistic participants showed enhanced encoding fidelity in more predictable contexts, whereas autistic participants showed reduced context-dependent modulation. Neural encoding timing also showed divergent context effects across groups, suggesting altered balance between feedback-based predictive mechanisms and locally driven adaptation processes. Within the autistic group, greater context-related modulation of encoding fidelity was associated with lower ADOS-2 Social Affect severity but poorer speech-in-noise perception, suggesting that the functional impact of contextual modulation depends on input reliability and task demands. These findings indicate that context-dependent modulation of speech encoding is altered in autism and may contribute to individual differences in auditory and social-communicative function. Lay SummaryWhen we listen to speech, the brain often uses sounds it has recently heard to help make sense of new ones, which is especially useful in noisy, everyday settings. In this study, autistic adults brains tended to process speech differently, drawing less on recent sound patterns than non-autistic adults, and this difference was related to their autism domain variability and to understanding speech in background noise. These effects were not simply better or worse but depended on the listening conditions, suggesting that natural differences in how the brain uses recent context may shape some of the ways autistic people listen to speech.

neuroscience↗

Stability of phoneme-related potentials across testing sessions and stimulus presentation conditions

ObjectivesObjective and ecologically valid measures of speech processing can complement conventional audiologic assessments. Phoneme-related potentials (PRPs), derived by averaging listeners electroencephalography (EEG) responses time-locked to phonemes in continuous speech, have emerged as a promising approach for capturing cortical processing of speech in naturalistic listening conditions. Importantly, PRPs reveal speech perception challenges even when conventional audiograms are clinically normal, positioning them as a promising neural marker for suprathreshold listening difficulties that standard audiometry often misses. As a critical step toward clinical translation, this study examined the extent to which PRP-derived measures remain stable across real-world contexts relevant to clinical implementation, including monaural versus binaural presentation, stimulus intensity level, and repeated testing sessions. The study also assessed cortical tracking of lower-level speech acoustics to determine whether the PRP findings could be attributed to acoustic processing. DesignEEG was recorded from 18 young adults with normal hearing as they listened to audiobook speech presented monaurally or binaurally at 60 or 75 dB across two sessions separated by approximately one week. Neural differentiation of phoneme manner-of-articulation classes (vowels, nasals/approximants, fricatives, and stops) in PRPs was quantified using two measures: an F-statistic reflecting between-manner relative to within-manner variability, and classification accuracy from a machine-learning model trained to predict manner class from PRPs. Temporal response function modeling assessed neural tracking of continuous acoustic envelope and onset features of the audiobook speech. ResultsNeither PRP-derived measure of manner differentiation showed significant effects of session, presentation modality, intensity level, or their interactions. Intraclass correlation analyses further indicated moderate-to-good reliability across all three factors. In contrast, neural tracking of the acoustic envelope and acoustic onsets was stronger under binaural than monaural presentation, with binaural presentation eliciting more pronounced cortical responses to the envelope. ConclusionsPRP-derived measures remained relatively stable across modest procedural variations that are common in clinical testing contexts, positioning PRPs as a potent objective index of naturalistic speech processing. This stability may reflect cortical processing of abstract, linguistically relevant speech categories and suggest that PRPs provide complementary information beyond audiologic assessments of peripheral auditory functions and EEG measures that primarily capture lower-level acoustic processing.

neuroscience↗

Reduced neural distinctiveness of speech representations in the middle-aged brain

Speech perception declines independent of hearing thresholds in middle-age, and the neurobiological reasons are unclear. In line with the age-related neural dedifferentiation hypothesis, we predicted that middle-aged adults show less distinct cortical representations of phonemes and acoustic-phonetic features relative to younger adults. In addition to an extensive audiological, auditory electrophysiological, and speech perceptual test battery, we measured electroencephalographic responses time-locked to phoneme instances (phoneme-related potential; PRP) in naturalistic, continuous speech and trained neural network classifiers to predict phonemes from these responses. Consistent with age-related neural dedifferentiation, phoneme predictions were less accurate, more uncertain, and involved a broader network for middle-aged adults compared with younger adults. Representational similarity analysis revealed that the featural relationship between phonemes was less robust in middle-age. Electrophysiological and behavioral measures revealed signatures of cochlear neural degeneration (CND) and speech perceptual deficits in middle-aged adults relative to younger adults. Consistent with prior work in animal models, signatures of CND were associated with greater cortical dedifferentiation, explaining nearly a third of the variance in PRP prediction accuracy together with measures of acoustic neural processing. Notably, even after controlling for CND signatures and acoustic processing abilities, age-group differences in PRP prediction accuracy remained. Overall, our results reveal "fuzzier" phonemic representations, suggesting that age-related cortical neural dedifferentiation can occur even in middle-age and may underlie speech perceptual challenges, despite a normal audiogram.

neuroscience↗

Increased listening effort and cochlear neural degeneration underlie behavioral deficits in speech perception in noise in normal hearing middle-aged adults.

Middle age represents a critical period of accelerated brain changes and provides a window for early detection and intervention in age-related neurological decline. Hearing loss is a key early marker of such decline and is linked to numerous comorbidities in older adults. Yet, [~]10% of middle-aged individuals who report hearing difficulties show normal audiograms. Cochlear neural degeneration (CND) could contribute to these hidden hearing deficits, though its role remains unclear due to a lack of objective diagnostics and uncertainty regarding its perceptual outcomes. Here, we employed a cross-species design to examine neural and behavioral signatures of CND. We measured envelope following responses (EFRs) - neural ensemble responses to sound originating from the peripheral auditory pathway - in young and middle-aged adults with normal audiograms and compared these responses to young and middle-aged Mongolian gerbils, where CND was histologically confirmed. We observed near identical changes in EFRs across species that were associated with CND. Behavioral assessments revealed agerelated speech-in-noise deficits under challenging conditions, while pupil-indexed listening effort increased with age even when behavioral performance was matched. Together, these results demonstrate that CND contributes to speech perception difficulties and elevated listening effort in midlife, which may ultimately lead to listening fatigue and social withdrawal.

neuroscience↗

Combining pupillometry and drift-diffusion models reveals auditory category learning dynamics

Pupillometry and drift-diffusion models (DDM) have emerged as powerful tools to offer insights into learning processes and decisional dynamics. Specifically, pupillary dilation can serve as a metric of arousal and cognitive processing, and DDMs examine processes underlying perceptual decision-making using behavioral accuracies and response times. Methodological constraints have complicated the combination of the two methods in the study of learning. DDMs require precise response times, yet pupillary responses are slow and are impacted by motor movements. Here, we developed a learning task that separately optimized measurement of behavioral response times and pupil dilation during learning. We modified a standard learning paradigm to include trials with and without timing delays between stimulus presentation and response. Delayed trials optimized measurement of the pupil, while immediate trials optimized behavioral response times. We tested whether decision-making processes estimated with DDMs could be recovered from delayed trials where pupil response measurement was optimized. Our results indicated that pupil responses on delayed trials showed distinct markers of learning that were not present on immediate trials. DDM parameters from delayed trials also showed expected trends for learning. Finally, we demonstrated that DDM parameters elicit differential pupillary responses. Together, these results indicate that learning dynamics and decisional processes can be decoded from pupillary responses.

physiology↗

Sensory representations and pupil-indexed listening effort provide complementary contributions to multi-talker speech intelligibility

Optimal speech perception in noise requires successful separation of the target speech stream from multiple competing background speech streams. The ability to segregate these competing speech streams depends on the fidelity of bottom-up neural representations of sensory information in the auditory system and top-down influences of effortful listening. Here, we use objective neurophysiological measures of bottom-up temporal processing using envelope-following responses (EFRs) to amplitude modulated tones and investigate their interactions with pupil-indexed listening effort, as it relates to performance on the Quick speech in noise (QuickSIN) test in young adult listeners with clinically normal hearing thresholds. We developed an approach using ear-canal electrodes and adjusting electrode montages for modulation rate ranges, which extended the rage of reliable EFR measurements as high as 1024Hz. Pupillary responses revealed changes in listening effort at the two most difficult signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), but behavioral deficits at the hardest SNR only. Neither pupil-indexed listening effort nor the slope of the EFR decay function independently related to QuickSIN performance. However, a linear model using the combination of EFRs and pupil metrics significantly explained variance in QuickSIN performance. These results suggest a synergistic interaction between bottom-up sensory coding and top-down measures of listening effort as it relates to speech perception in noise. These findings can inform the development of next-generation tests for hearing deficits in listeners with normal-hearing thresholds that incorporates a multi-dimensional approach to understanding speech intelligibility deficits.

physiology↗

Low amplitude transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation modulates performance but not pupil size during non-native speech category learning

Sub-threshold transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) synchronized with behavioral training can selectively enhance non-native speech category learning in adults. Prior work has demonstrated behavioral performance increases when taVNS is paired with easier-to-learn Mandarin tone categories in native English listeners, relative to when taVNS is paired with harder-to-learn Mandarin tone categories or without taVNS. Mechanistically, this temporally-precise plasticity has been attributed to noradrenergic modulation. However, prior work did not specifically utilize methodologies that indexed noradrenergic modulation and, therefore, were unable to explicitly test this hypothesis. Our goals for the current study were to use pupillometry to gain mechanistic insights into taVNS behavioral effects. Participants learned to categorize Mandarin tones while pupillometry was recorded. In a double-blind design, participants were divided into two taVNS groups that, as in the prior study, differed according to whether taVNS was paired with easier-to-learn tones or harder-to-learn tones. We found that taVNS led to faster rates of learning on trials paired with stimulation. Lower amplitude taVNS also led to faster rates of learning compared to higher amplitude taVNS. However, these effects were not group specific, and we did not find evidence of a taVNS correlate in the pupillary response. The results suggest that stimulation amplitude may be a critical determinant of learning outcomes and pupillary modulation. Future studies on subthreshold taVNS need to systematically evaluate the effect of stimulation intensity on behavioral plasticity and potential taVNS biomarkers.

physiology↗

Working memory relates to individual differences in speech category learning: Insights from computational modeling and pupillometry

Across two experiments, we examine the relationship between individual differences in working memory (WM) and the acquisition of non-native speech categories in adulthood. While WM is associated with individual differences in a variety of learning tasks, successful acquisition of speech categories is argued to be contingent on WM-independent procedural-learning mechanisms. Thus, the role of WM in speech category learning is unclear. In Experiment 1, we show that individuals with higher WM acquire non-native speech categories faster and to a greater extent than those with lower WM. In Experiment 2, we replicate these results and show that individuals with higher WM use more optimal, procedural-based learning strategies and demonstrate more distinct speech-evoked pupillary responses for correct relative to incorrect trials. We propose that higher WM may allow for greater stimulus-related attention, resulting in more robust representations and optimal learning strategies. We discuss implications for neurobiological models of speech category learning.

neuroscience↗