Biology subjects

May, G. E.

Publications and source records attributed to May, G. E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

An in vivo massively parallel platform for deciphering tissue-specific regulatory function

Genetic studies are rapidly identifying non-protein-coding human disease-associated loci. Understanding the regulatory mechanisms underlying these loci remains a challenge because the causal variants and the tissues in which they act are often unclear. Massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) have the potential to link differences in genome sequence, including genetic variants, to tissue-specific regulatory function. Although MPRA and similar technologies have been widely adopted in cell culture, there have been several barriers to widespread use in animals. We overcome these challenges with a new whole-animal MPRA (WhAMPRA), where systemic intravenous AAV effectively transduces the plasmid MPRA library to mouse tissues. Our WhAMPRA approach revealed models of tissue-specific regulation that generally match machine learning model predictions. In addition, we measured the regulatory effects of disrupting MEF2C transcription factor binding sites and impacts of late onset Alzheimers disease-associated genetic variations. Overall, our WhAMPRA technology simultaneously determines the transcriptional functions of hundreds of enhancers in vivo across multiple tissues.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2022

False-Positive IRESes from Hoxa9 and other genes resulting from errors in mammalian 5' UTR annotations

Hyperconserved genomic sequences have great promise for understanding core biological processes. It has been recently proposed that scores of hyperconserved transcript leaders (hTLs) encode Internal Ribosome Entry Sites (IRESes) that drive cap-independent translation in part via interactions with ribosome expansion segments. However, the direct functional significance of such interactions has not yet been definitively demonstrated. We provide evidence that the putative IRESes previously reported in Hox gene hTLs are rarely included in transcript leaders. Instead, these regions function independently as transcriptional promoters. In addition, we find the proposed RNA structure of the putative Hoxa9 IRES is not conserved. Instead, sequences previously shown to be essential for putative IRES activity encode a hyperconserved transcription factor binding site (E-box) that contributes to its promoter activity by binding to the transcription factors USF1 and USF2. Similar E-box sequences enhance the promoter activities of other putative Hoxa gene IRESes. Moreover, we provide evidence that the vast majority of hTLs with putative IRES activity overlap transcriptional promoters, enhancers, and 3 splice sites that are most likely responsible for their reported IRES activities. These results argue strongly against recently reported widespread IRES-like activities from hTLs and contradict proposed interactions between ribosomal expansion segment ES9S and putative IRESes. Furthermore, our work underscores the importance of accurate transcript annotations, controls in bicistronic reporter assays, and the power of synthesizing publicly available data from multiple sources.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2021

Unraveling the influences of sequence and position on yeast uORF activity using massively parallel reporter systems and machine learning.

Upstream open reading frames (uORFs) are potent cis-acting regulators of mRNA translation and nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). While both AUG- and non-AUG initiated uORFs are ubiquitous in ribosome profiling studies, few uORFs have been experimentally tested. Consequently, the relative influences of sequence, structural, and positional features on uORF activity have not been determined. We quantified thousands of yeast uORFs using massively parallel reporter assays in wildtype and {Delta}upf1 yeast. While nearly all AUG uORFs were robust repressors, most non-AUG uORFs had relatively weak impacts on expression. Machine learning regression modeling revealed that uORF functions are strongly impacted by both their sequences and locations within transcript leaders. Indeed, alternative transcription start sites highly influenced uORF activity. These results define the scope of natural uORF activity, identify features associated with translational repression and NMD, and suggest that the locations of uORFs in transcript leaders are nearly as important as uORF sequences.

genomics↗