Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mauduit, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Mauduit, D..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluating Methods for the Prediction of Cell Type-Specific Enhancers in the Mammalian Cortex

Identifying cell type-specific enhancers in the brain is critical to building genetic tools for investigating the mammalian brain. Computational methods for functional enhancer prediction have been proposed and validated in the fruit fly and not yet the mammalian brain. We organized the Brain Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN) Challenge: Predicting Functional Cell Type-Specific Enhancers from Cross-Species Multi-Omics to assess machine learning and feature-based methods designed to nominate enhancer DNA sequences to target cell types in the mouse cortex. Methods were evaluated based on in vivo validation data from hundreds of cortical cell type-specific enhancers that were previously packaged into individual AAV vectors and retro-orbitally injected into mice. We find that open chromatin was a key predictor of functional enhancers, and sequence models improved prediction of non-functional enhancers that can be deprioritized as opposed to pursued for in vivo testing. Sequence models also identified cell type-specific transcription factor codes that can guide designs of in silico enhancers. This community challenge establishes a benchmark for enhancer prioritization algorithms and reveals computational approaches and molecular information that are crucial for identifying functional enhancers in mammalian cortical cell types. The results of this challenge bring us closer to understanding the complex gene regulatory landscape of the mammalian cortex and to designing more efficient genetic tools to target cortical cell types.

genomics↗

Enhancer-driven cell type comparison reveals similarities between the mammalian and bird pallium

Combinations of transcription factors govern the identity of cell types, which is reflected by enhancer codes in cis-regulatory genomic regions. Cell type-specific enhancer codes at nucleotide-level resolution have not yet been characterized for the mammalian neocortex. It is currently unknown whether these codes are conserved in other vertebrate brains, and whether they are informative to resolve homology relationships for species that lack a neocortex such as birds. To compare enhancer codes of cell types from the mammalian neocortex with those from the bird pallium, we generated single-cell multiome and spatially-resolved transcriptomics data of the chicken telencephalon. We then trained deep learning models to characterize cell type-specific enhancer codes for the human, mouse, and chicken telencephalon. We devised three metrics that exploit enhancer codes to compare cell types between species. Based on these metrics, non-neuronal and GABAergic cell types show a high degree of regulatory similarity across vertebrates. Proposed homologies between mammalian neocortical and avian pallial excitatory neurons are still debated. Our enhancer code based comparison shows that excitatory neurons of the mammalian neocortex and the avian pallium exhibit a higher degree of divergence than other cell types. In contrast to existing evolutionary models, the mammalian deep layer excitatory neurons are most similar to mesopallial neurons; and mammalian upper layer neurons to hyper- and nidopallial neurons based on their enhancer codes. In addition to characterizing the enhancer codes in the mammalian and avian telencephalon, and revealing unexpected correspondences between cell types of the mammalian neocortex and the chicken pallium, we present generally applicable deep learning approaches to characterize and compare cell types across species via the genomic regulatory code.

genomics↗

Enhancer grammar of liver cell types and hepatocyte zonation states

Cell type identity is encoded by gene regulatory networks (GRN), in which transcription factors (TFs) bind to enhancers to regulate target gene expression. In the mammalian liver, lineage TFs have been characterized for the main cell types, including hepatocytes. Hepatocytes cover a relatively broad cellular state space, as they differ significantly in their metabolic state, and function, depending on their position with respect to the central or portal vein in a liver lobule. It is unclear whether this spatially defined cellular state space, called zonation, is also governed by a well-defined gene regulatory code. To address this challenge, we have mapped enhancer-GRNs across liver cell types at high resolution, using a combination of single cell multiomics, spatial omics, GRN inference, and deep learning. We found that cell state changes in transcription and chromatin accessibility in hepatocytes, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatic stellate cells depend on zonation. Enhancer-GRN mapping suggests that zonation states in hepatocytes are driven by the repressors Tcf7l1 and Tbx3, that modulate the core hepatocyte GRN, controlled by Hnf4a, Cebpa, Hnf1a, Onecut1 and Foxa1, among others. To investigate how these TFs cooperate with cell type TFs, we performed an in vivo massively parallel reporter assay on 12,000 hepatocyte enhancers and used these data to train a hierarchical deep learning model (called DeepLiver) that exploits both enhancer accessibility and activity. DeepLiver confirms Cebpa, Onecut, Foxa1, Hnf1a and Hnf4a as drivers of enhancer specificity in hepatocytes; Tcf7l1/2 and Tbx3 as regulators of the zonation state; and Hnf4a, Hnf1a, AP-1 and Ets as activators. Finally, taking advantage of in silico mutagenesis predictions from DeepLiver and enhancer assays, we confirmed that the destruction of Tcf7l1/2 or Tbx3 motifs in zonated enhancers abrogates their zonation bias. Our study provides a multi-modal understanding of the regulatory code underlying hepatocyte identity and their zonation state, that can be exploited to engineer enhancers with specific activity levels and zonation patterns.

genomics↗

Cell type directed design of synthetic enhancers

Transcriptional enhancers act as docking stations for combinations of transcription factors and thereby regulate spatiotemporal activation of their target genes. A single enhancer, of a few hundred base pairs in length, can autonomously and independently of its location and orientation drive cell-type specific expression of a gene or transgene. It has been a long-standing goal in the field to decode the regulatory logic of an enhancer and to understand the details of how spatiotemporal gene expression is encoded in an enhancer sequence. Recently, deep learning models have yielded unprecedented insight into the enhancer code, and well-trained models are reaching a level of understanding that may be close to complete. As a consequence, we hypothesized that deep learning models can be used to guide the directed design of synthetic, cell type specific enhancers, and that this process would allow for a detailed tracing of all enhancer features at nucleotide-level resolution. Here we implemented and compared three different design strategies, each built on a deep learning model: (1) directed sequence evolution; (2) directed iterative motif implanting; and (3) generative design. We evaluated the function of fully synthetic enhancers to specifically target Kenyon cells in the fruit fly brain using transgenic animals. We then exploited this concept further by creating "dual-code" enhancers that target two cell types, and minimal enhancers smaller than 50 base pairs that are fully functional. By examining the trajectories followed during state space searches towards functional enhancers, we could accurately define the enhancer code as the optimal strength, combination, and relative distance of TF activator motifs, and the absence of TF repressor motifs. Finally, we applied the same three strategies to successfully design human enhancers. In conclusion, enhancer design guided by deep learning leads to better understanding of how enhancers work and shows that their code can be exploited to manipulate cell states.

genomics↗

Analysis of long and short enhancers in melanoma cell states

Understanding how enhancers drive cell type specificity and efficiently identifying them is essential for the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. In melanoma, the melanocytic (MEL) and the mesenchymal-like (MES) states present themselves with different responses to therapy, making the identification of specific enhancers highly relevant. Using massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) in a panel of patient-derived melanoma lines (MM lines), we set to identify and decipher melanoma enhancers by first focusing on regions with state specific H3K27 acetylation close to differentially expressed genes. A more in-depth evaluation of those regions was then pursued by investigating the activity of ATAC-seq peaks found therein along with a full tiling of the acetylated regions with 190 bp sequences. Activity was observed in more than 60% of the selected regions and we were able to precisely locate the active regions within ATAC-seq peaks. Comparison of sequence content with activity, using the deep learning model DeepMEL2, revealed that AP-1 alone is responsible for the MES enhancer activity, while SOX and MITF both influence MEL enhancer activity with SOX being required to achieve high levels of activity. Overall, our MPRA assays shed light on the relationship between long and short sequences in terms of their sequence content, enhancer activity, and specificity as reporters across melanoma cell states.

genomics↗

Cross-species analysis of melanoma enhancer logic using deep learning

Genomic enhancers form the central nodes of gene regulatory networks by harbouring combinations of transcription factor binding sites. Deciphering the combinatorial code by which these binding sites are assembled within enhancers is indispensable to understand their regulatory involvement in establishing a cells phenotype, especially within biological systems with dysregulated gene regulatory networks, such as melanoma. In order to unravel the enhancer logic of the two most common melanoma cell states, namely the melanocytic and mesenchymal-like state, we combined comparative epigenomics with machine learning. By profiling chromatin accessibility using ATAC-seq on a cohort of 27 melanoma cell lines across six different species, we demonstrate the conservation of the two main melanoma states and their underlying master regulators. To perform an in-depth analysis of the enhancer architecture, we trained a deep neural network, called DeepMEL, to classify melanoma enhancers not only in the human genome, but also in other species. DeepMEL revealed the presence, organisation and positional specificity of important transcription factor binding sites. Together, this extensive analysis of the melanoma enhancer code allowed us to propose the concept of a core regulatory complex binding to melanocytic enhancers, consisting of SOX10, TFAP2A, MITF and RUNX, and to disentangle their individual roles in regulating enhancer accessibility and activity.

genomics↗

Identification of genomic enhancers through spatial integration of single-cell transcriptomics and epigenomics

Single-cell technologies allow measuring chromatin accessibility and gene expression in each cell, but jointly utilizing both layers to map bona fide gene regulatory networks and enhancers remains challenging. Here, we generate independent single-cell RNA-seq and single-cell ATAC-seq atlases of the Drosophila eye-antennal disc and spatially integrate the data using a virtual latent space that mimics the organization of the 2D tissue. To validate spatially predicted enhancers, we use a large collection of enhancer-reporter lines and identify [~]85% of enhancers in which chromatin accessibility and enhancer activity are coupled. Next, we infer enhancer-to-gene relationships in the virtual space, finding that genes are regulated by multiple redundant enhancers. Exploiting cell-type specific enhancers, we deconvolute cell-type specific effects of bulk-derived chromatin accessibility QTLs. Finally, we discover that Prospero drives neuronal differentiation through the binding of a GGG motif. In summary, we provide a comprehensive spatial characterization of gene regulation in a 2D tissue.

genomics↗

Single-cell gene regulatory network analysis reveals new melanoma cell states and transition trajectories during phenotype switching

Melanoma is notorious for its cellular heterogeneity, which is at least partly due to its ability to transition between alternate cell states. Similarly to EMT, melanoma cells with a melanocytic phenotype can switch to a mesenchymal-like phenotype. However, scattered emerging evidence indicates that additional, intermediate state(s) may exist. In order to search for such new melanoma states and decipher their underlying gene regulatory network (GRN), we extensively studied ten patient-derived melanoma cultures by single-cell RNA-seq of >39,000 cells. Although each culture exhibited a unique transcriptome, we identified shared gene regulatory networks that underlie the extreme melanocytic and mesenchymal cell states, as well as one (stable) intermediate state. The intermediate state was corroborated by a distinct open chromatin landscape and governed by the transcription factors EGR3, NFATC2, and RXRG. Single-cell migration assays established that this \"transition\" state exhibits an intermediate migratory phenotype. Through a dense time-series sampling of single cells and dynamic GRN inference, we unraveled the sequential and recurrent arrangement of transcriptional programs at play during phenotype switching that ultimately lead to the mesenchymal cell state. We provide the scRNA-Seq data with 39,263 melanoma cells on our SCope platform and the ATAC-seq data on a UCSC hub to jointly serve as a resource for the melanoma field. Together, this exhaustive analysis of melanoma cell state diversity indicates that additional states exists between the two extreme melanocytic and mesenchymal-like states. The GRN we identified may serve as a new putative target to prevent the switch to mesenchymal cell state and thereby, acquisition of metastatic and drug resistant potential.

genomics↗