Biology subjects

Mathew, A. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Mathew, A. S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Boiling histotripsy induces dendritic cell activation and acquisition of antigen in tumor draining lymph nodes

BackgroundBoiling histotripsy (BH), a mechanical focused ultrasound ablation strategy, can elicit intriguing signatures of anti-tumor immunity. However, the influence of BH on dendritic cell function is unknown, compromising our ability to optimally combine BH with immunotherapies to control metastatic disease. MethodsBH was applied using a sparse scan (1 mm spacing between sonications) protocol to B16F10-ZsGreen melanoma in bilateral and unilateral settings. Ipsilateral and contralateral tumor growth was measured. Flow cytometry was used to track ZsGreen antigen and assess how BH drives dendritic cell behavior. ResultsBH monotherapy elicited ipsilateral and abscopal tumor control in this highly aggressive model. Tumor antigen presence in immune cells in the tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) was [~]3-fold greater at 24h after BH, but this abated by 96h. B cells, macrophages, monocytes, granulocytes, and both conventional dendritic cell subsets (i.e. cDC1s and cDC2s) acquired markedly more antigen with BH. BH drove activation of both cDC subsets, with activation being dependent upon tumor antigen acquisition. Our data also suggest that BH-liberated tumor antigen is complexed with damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and that cDCs do not traffic to the TDLN with antigen. Rather, they acquire antigen as it flows through afferent lymph vessels into the TDLN. ConclusionWhen applied with a sparse scan protocol, BH monotherapy elicits abscopal melanoma control and shapes dendritic cell function through several previously unappreciated mechanisms. These results offer new insight into how to best combine BH with immunotherapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=110 SRC="FIGDIR/small/552844v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a486d4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@190041forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1febf36org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bb7f8f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2020

Transcriptomic Response of Brain Tissue to Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Depends Strongly on Anesthesia

Focused ultrasound (FUS) mediated blood brain barrier disruption (BBBD) is a promising strategy for the targeted delivery of systemically-administered therapeutics to the central nervous system (CNS). Pre-clinical investigations of BBBD have been performed on different anesthetic backgrounds; however, the potential influence of the choice of anesthetic on the molecular response to BBBD is unknown, despite its potential to critically affect interpretation of experimental therapeutic outcomes. Here, using bulk RNA sequencing approaches, we comprehensively examined the transcriptomic response of both normal brain tissue and brain tissue exposed to FUS-induced BBBD in mice anesthetized with either isoflurane with medical air (Iso) or ketamine/dexmedetomidine (KD). In normal murine brain tissue, Iso alone elicited minimal differential gene expression (DGE) and repressed pathways associated with neuronal signaling. KD alone, however, led to massive DGE and enrichment of pathways associated with protein synthesis. In brain tissue exposed to BBBD (1 MHz, 0.5 Hz pulse repetition frequency, 0.4 MPa peak-negative pressure), we systematically evaluated the relative effects of anesthesia, microbubbles, and FUS on the transcriptome. Of particular interest, we observed that gene sets associated with sterile inflammatory responses and cell-cell junctional activity were induced by BBBD, regardless of the choice of anesthesia. Meanwhile, gene sets associated with metabolism, platelet activity, tissue repair, and signaling pathways, were differentially affected by BBBD, with a strong dependence on the anesthetic. We conclude that the underlying transcriptomic response to FUS-mediated BBBD may be powerfully influenced by anesthesia. These findings raise considerations for the translation of FUS-BBBD delivery approaches that impact, in particular, metabolism, tissue repair, and intracellular signaling.

bioengineering↗