Biology subjects

Martinossi-Allibert, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Martinossi-Allibert, I..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Female-biased sex ratios despite stable genetic sex determination across a climatic gradient in a marine fish

Adult sex ratio (ASR) is a fundamental parameter shaping population dynamics and evolutionary trajectories. In theory, ASR is governed by the sex determination (SD) system and sex-specific mortality. Yet, ASR is often hard to predict in natural populations because of ecological effects on its determinants. We address this ecological complexity by investigating the drivers of ASR across a steep climatic gradient in Scandinavian populations of the two-spotted goby Pomatoschistus flavescens. Demographic surveys accounting for over 25000 fish in 30 locations, spanning 10{degrees} of latitude, revealed a general female-bias of the ASR, ca. 75%. To assess the contribution of SD, we combined reduced representation sequencing of 180 adults with our novel long-read male genome assembly. We characterised the genetic architecture of an XX/XY SD system, and identified a male-specific duplicate from the TGF-{beta} signaling pathway, amhr2y, as a candidate sex-determining gene. Subsequent genotyping of eggs and juveniles showed consistently unbiased sex ratios across latitudes, implying that the female-biased arises at later life stages. Interpreted in the light of historical data, our findings allow us to reject environmental sex determination and sex-biased mortality as important drivers of ASR bias in this species. We propose instead that the female bias originates from sex-specific patterns of habitat distribution, which could result from ecological conditions interacting with the distinct reproductive strategies of females and males. Our results underscore the need to go beyond primary theoretical expectations to understand fundamental demographic parameters within their relevant ecological context.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2026

Local mating competition, but not climate, drives male reproductive success across a latitudinal gradient in a nest-brooding marine fish

Understanding ecological drivers of reproductive success is crucial to predict whether natural populations can cope with the pace of anthropogenically driven environmental change. In marine ecosystems, this knowledge is difficult to acquire due to the lack of tractable field systems. Here, we took advantage of the nest-brooding behavior of the two-spotted goby Pomatoschistus flavescens, an important planktivorous fish in Scandinavian coastal ecosystems, to study its reproduction across the steep climatic gradient of its natural range. We deployed 360 artificial nests in the field, covering six populations during the breeding season of 2022. We found that climate explained differences among populations in the phenotypes of nest-holding males, and in the impact of both marine growth and parental cannibalism on the broods. In addition, climate affected egg density and diameter. Despite these ecological effects, and although populations differed in average male reproductive success, reproductive success was not influenced by climate. Instead, it was largely determined by competition occurring at the local scale, in particular through the acquisition of high-quality nests, which was itself affected by the relative size of males within the local pool. We propose that the frequency-dependent nature of mating competition may buffer reproductive success against climatic influence in P. flavescens, and discuss the potential generality of such mechanisms and implications for population resilience.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Sexual display behavior follows consistent sex-specific reaction norms across latitude in response to operational sex-ratio.

Predicting the strength and direction of sexual selection is a challenging task for evolutionary theory, as the effects of ecological factors, social environment, and behavioural plasticity, all need to be taken into account. The Operational Sex Ratio (OSR) is a key variable, which has been shown to (i) affect the strength and direction of mating competition, as a social environment cue, and (ii) be affected itself by ecological conditions through sex-specific environmental effects. Yet, gaining a global view of (i) and (ii) in wild populations represents an arduous but necessary step to further our understanding of sexual selection dynamics in the wild. Here, we address this challenge by using reaction norms. We conducted an extensive field study on the two-spotted goby Pomatoschistus flavescens, monitoring six populations along a latitudinal gradient during an entire breeding season. Doing so, we compared across populations the temporal trajectories in social environment and sexual displays, which is unprecedented. We develop a reaction norm framework based on OSR theory to analyse the data. We show that what appears to be tremendous variation in sexual displays across populations and sampling times, follows consistent rules: sexual display behaviour follows behavioural reaction norms in response to the social environment that are consistent across populations, but social environment fluctuations are specific to each population. Recording behaviour not only over time, but also along a latitudinal gradient where ecological conditions change and in turn affect OSR, was necessary to gain insight into the relationship between social environment and sexual displays, which in turn contributes to sexual selection dynamics.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Sexual conflict drives micro- and macroevolution of sexual dimorphism in immunity

BackgroundSexual selection can have major effects on mating rates and sex-specific costs of mating and may thereby influence sex-differences in immunity as well as associated host-pathogen dynamics. Yet, experimental evidence linking the mating system to evolved sexual dimorphism in immunity are scarce and the direct effects of mating rate on immunity are not well established. Here, we use transcriptomic analyses, experimental evolution and phylogenetic comparative methods to study the association between the mating system and sexual dimorphism in immunity in seed beetles, where mating causes internal injuries in females. ResultsWe demonstrate that female phenoloxidase (PO) activity, involved in wound healing and defence against parasitic infections, is elevated relative to males. This difference is accompanied by concomitant sex-differences in the expression of genes in the pro-phenoloxidase activating cascade. We document substantial phenotypic plasticity in female PO activity in response to mating and show that experimental evolution under enforced monogamy (resulting in low remating rates and sexual conflict relative to natural polygamy) rapidly decreases female (but not male) PO activity. Moreover, monogamous females have evolved increased tolerance to bacterial infection unrelated to mating, implying that female responses to costly mating may trade off with other aspects of immune defence, an hypothesis which broadly accords with the documented sex differences in gene expression. Finally, female (but not male) PO activity shows correlated evolution with the perceived harmfulness of male genitalia across 12 species of seed beetles, suggesting that sexual conflict has a significant influence on sexual dimorphisms in immunity in this group of insects. ConclusionsOur study provides insights into the links between sexual conflict and sexual dimorphism in immunity at the molecular and phenotypic level and suggests that selection pressures moulded by mating interactions can lead to a sex-specific mosaic of immune responses with important implications for host-pathogen dynamics in sexually reproducing organisms.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

The evolution of anisogamy does not always lead to male competition

Anisogamy has evolved in a large proportion of sexually reproducing multicellular organisms allowing the definition of the female and male sexes, producing large and small gametes, respectively. Anisogamy is the initial sexual dimorphism: it has lead the sexes to experience selection differently, which makes it a good starting point to understand the evolution of further sexual dimorphisms. For instance, it is generally accepted that anisogamy sets the stage for more intense intrasexual competition in the male sex than in the female sex. However, we argue that this idea may rely on assumptions on the conditions under which anisogamy has evolved in the first place. We consider here two widely accepted scenarios for the evolution of anisogamy: gamete competition or gamete limitation. We present a mechanistic mathematical model in which both gamete size and an intrasexual competition trait for fertilisation can coevolve in a population starting without dimorphism between its two mating types. Two different intrasexual competition traits are investigated, gamete motility and the ability of gametes to capture gametes of the opposite mating type. We show that gamete competition and gamete limitation can lead to greatly different outcomes in terms of which sex competes most for fertilisation. Our results suggest that gamete competition is most likely to lead to stronger competition in males. On the other hand, under gamete limitation, competition in form of motility can evolve in either sex while gamete capture mainly evolves in females. This study suggests that anisogamy does not per se lead to more intense male competition. The conditions under which anisogamy evolves matter, as well as the competition trait considered.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Sexual selection, environmental robustness and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: a test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.

Whether sexual selection impedes or aids adaptation has become a pressing question in times of rapid environmental change and parallels the debate about how the evolution of individual traits impacts on population dynamics and viability. The net effect of sexual selection on population viability results from a balance between genetic benefits of \"good genes\" effects and costs of sexual conflict. Depending on how these facets of sexual selection are affected under environmental change, extinction of maladapted populations could either be avoided or accelerated. Here, we evolved seed beetles under three alternative mating regimes (polygamy, monogamy and male-limited selection) to disentangle the contributions of sexual selection, fecundity selection and male-female coevolution to individual reproductive success and population fitness. We compared these contributions between the ancestral environment and two new stressful environments (temperature and host plant shift). Evolution under polygamy resulted in the highest individual reproductive success in competitive context for both sexes. Moreover, females evolving only via sexual selection on their male siblings in the male-limited regime had similar reproductive success and higher fertility than females evolving under monogamy, suggesting that sexual selection on males had positive effects on female fitness components. Interestingly, male-limited sexual selection resulted in males that were robust to stress, compared to males from the two evolution regimes applying fecundity selection. We quantified the population-level consequences of this sex-specific adaptation and found evidence that costs of socio-sexual interactions were higher in male-limited lines compared to polygamous lines, and that this difference was particularly pronounced at elevated temperature to which males from the male-limited regime were more robust compared to their conspecific females. These results illustrate the tension between individual-level adaptation and population-level viability in sexually reproducing species and suggest that sex-specific selection can cause differences in environmental robustness that may impact population demography under environmental change.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2018

The efficacy of sexual selection under environmental change

Sexual selection can promote adaptation if sexually selected traits are reliable indicators of genetic quality. Moreover, stronger sexual selection in males, as often reported in empirical studies, may help purge deleterious alleles at a low cost to population productivity. However, to what extent this remains true when a changing environment affects sexual selection dynamics has been debated. Here, we show that even if sexually selected traits remain honest signals of male quality in new environments, the efficacy of sexual selection will often be reduced under stress. We model the strength of sex-specific selection under different levels of environmental stress in a population in which males compete with each other for fertilization success and in which females experience fecundity selection. We observe that the strength of sexual selection is reduced relative to fecundity selection, resulting in a lowered potential for selection on males to aid adaptation under environmental change.

evolutionary biology↗