Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Marson, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Marson, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

How to make “number lines” stable in the mind’s eye

Humans are prone to mentally organise the ascending series of integers according to reading habits, so that in western cultures small numbers are positioned to the left of larger ones on a mental number line (MNL, Dehaene et al., 1993). Despite 140 years since seminal observations made by Sir Francis Galton in human observers that experienced vivid MNLs (Galton, 1880a,b), the neural and functional mechanisms that give rise to MNLs remain elusive. Here, in a series of three experiments we show that spatially organised MNLs are not \"all or none\" phenomena and that MNLs get progressively less noisy and more stable in the minds eye, the more an observer fully combines left/right spatial codes with small/large magnitude codes to operate on numbers. These results show that conceptualising the ascending series of integers in spatial terms depends on contextual clues rather than being inherent to the semantic representation of numbers.

neuroscience↗

Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.

In a series of recent studies we have pointed out that the use of contrasting left/right spatial codes, whether indirectly related to number magnitudes through response selection or directly associated to the same magnitudes to guide their spatial positioning on a mental number line, is crucial in eliciting space-number associations (Aiello, 2012; Fattorini et al., 2015; 2016; Pinto et al., 2018). Nonetheless, this conclusion is based on experiments in which spatial and number-magnitudes codes are used jointly during task performance. Here, in a series of unimanual Go/No-Go tasks with intermixed central numerical and pictorial targets, i.e. arrows pointing to the left or to the right, we explore whether spatial codes used in isolation inherently evoke the left-to-right representation of number magnitudes and, vice-versa, whether number-magnitude codes used in isolation inherently evoke the conceptual activation of left/right spatial codes. In a first series of experiments participants were asked to provide unimanual Go/N-Go responses based on instructions that activated only magnitude codes, e.g. \"push only if the number is lower than 5 and whenever an arrow appears\", or only spatial codes, e.g. \"push only when an arrow points to the left and whenever a number appears\". In a second series of experiments, the same numerical instructions were combined with the request of responding only to arrows in a specific colour, e.g. \"push when the number is lower than 5 and whenever a blue arrow appears\". At variance with a recent experiment by Shaki and Fischer (2018), in our experiments no constant association was present between a specific arrow colour and a specific arrow direction. The results of these experiments highlight no space-number congruency effects: e.g. no faster RTs to arrows pointing to the left rather than to the right when participants attend to numbers lower than 5 and, vice-versa, no faster RTs to numbers lower than 5 rather than higher, when participants attend to arrows pointing to the left. Based on these findings it must be concluded that neither space codes used in isolation can elicit a spatial representation of number magnitudes nor number-magnitude codes used in isolation can trigger the activation of spatial codes. Thus, spatial and numerical codes must be used jointly to evoke spatially organised mental number lines.

neuroscience↗