Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Marra, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Marra, G..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

TIME-CoExpress: Temporal Trajectory Modeling of Dynamic Gene Co-expression Patterns Using Single-Cell Transcriptomics Data

The rapid advancements of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) technology provide high-resolution views of transcriptomic activity within a single cell. Most routine analyses of scRNAseq data focus on individual genes; however, the one-gene-at-a-time analysis is likely to miss meaningful genetic interactions. Gene co-expression analysis addresses this issue by identifying coordinated gene expression changes in response to cellular conditions, such as developmental or temporal trajectory. Identifying differential co-expression gene combinations along the cell temporal trajectory using scRNAseq data can provide deeper insight into the biological processes. Existing approaches for gene co-expression analysis assume a restrictive linear change of gene co-expression. In this paper, we propose a copula-based approach with proper data-driven smoothing functions to model non-linear gene co-expression changes along cellular temporal trajectories. Our proposed approach provides flexibility to incorporate characteristics such as over-dispersion and zero-inflation rate observed in scRNAseq data into the modeling framework. We conducted a series of simulation analyses to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm. We demonstrate the implementation of the proposed algorithm using a scRNAseq dataset and identify differential co-expression gene pairs along cell temporal trajectory in pituitary embryonic development comparing Nxn-/- mutated versus wild-type mice.

genetics↗

Validation of hypermethylated DNA regions found in colorectal cancers as potential aging-independent biomarkers of precancerous colorectal lesions

BackgroundWe previously identified 16,772 colorectal cancer-associated hypermethylated DNA regions that were also detectable in precancerous colorectal lesions (preCRCs) and unrelated to normal mucosal aging. We have now conducted a study to validate 990 of these differentially methylated DNA regions (DMR) in a new series of preCRCs. MethodsWe used targeted bisulfite sequencing to validate these 990 potential biomarkers in 59 preCRC tissue samples (41 conventional adenomas, 18 sessile serrated lesions), each with a patient-matched normal mucosal sample. Based on differential DNA methylation tests, a panel of (candidate) DMRs was chosen on a subset of the (our) cohort and validated on the remaining part of our cohort and (two) further publicly available datasets with respect to their stratifying potential between preCRCs and normal mucosa. ResultsStrong statistical significance for the difference in methylation levels was observed across the full set of 990 investigated DMRs. From these, a selected candidate panel of 30 DMRs correctly identified 58/59 tumors (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.998). ConclusionsThese validated DNA hypermethylation markers can be exploited to develop more accurate noninvasive colorectal tumor screening assays.

genomics↗

The metabolome and lipidome of colorectal adenomas and cancers

IntroductionIn-depth knowledge of metabolic dysregulations in colorectal cancer (CRC) (and other cancers as well) is essential for developing treatments that specifically kill neoplastic cells. It may also allow us to pinpoint metabolites or lipids with potential for development as tumor biomarkers for use in body-fluid or breath assays. CRC onset is preceded by an interval of [~]10 years characterized by the presence of precancerous lesions, and our previous studies have revealed epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic evidence in these lesions of certain metabolic changes typical of CRC. These findings prompted us to conduct untargeted metabolomic and lipidomic analyses of CRCs and colorectal adenomas (the most common precancerous lesions of the gut). MethodsWe analyzed 29 endoscopically collected tumor tissue samples (29 adenomas [ADNs], 10 CRCs, each with a colon segment-matched sample of normal mucosa [i.e., 29 NM-ADN, 10 NM-CRC]). The freshly collected samples were promptly frozen in liquid nitrogen and later processed to obtain metabolite and lipid extracts. Each of the 78 samples was analyzed with nano-flow LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry) to characterize its metabolome (using HILIC, Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography) and lipidome (using RP, Reversed Phase chromatography). The data acquired were processed using Progenesis QI. For statistical and multivariate analysis of the resulting peak tables, we used basic R packages and the R package made4. ResultsUnsupervised between-group analysis based on the full set of detected metabolites (n=1830) and lipids (n=2365) clearly discriminated ADNs and CRCs from their matched samples of normal mucosa at both the metabolome and lipidome levels. Compared with the NM-ADN, the ADNs contained significantly different levels of 14.6% of the metabolites and 10.8% of the lipids. Fewer compounds (9.1% of metabolites, 6.2% of lipids) displayed differential abundance in CRCs (vs. NM-CRC). The metabolome and lipidome of the NM-ADN also differed from those of the NM-CRC, probably reflecting the presence of a field cancerization effect exerted by the invasive tumors. A substantial number of metabolites (n=340) and lipids (n=201) also displayed abundance differentials across the sequential tumorigenic stages represented by the NM-ADN (considered more representative of NM from a lesion-free colon) [->] ADN [->] CRC. In most cases, the trend consisted of progressive increases or progressive decreases in abundance as the tumorigenesis advanced. ConclusionsOur findings provide a preliminary picture of the progressive metabolomic and lipidomic changes occurring during the adenomatous phase of colorectal tumorigenesis. Once definitively annotated, the numerous differentially abundant compounds detected in this study may well shed valuable light on the metabolic dysregulations occurring during this process and provide useful clues for the development of novel tools for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal tumors.

cancer biology↗

DAMEfinder: A Method to Detect Differential Allele-Specific Methylation

DNA methylation is a highly studied epigenetic signature that is associated with regulation of gene expression, whereby genes with high levels of promoter methylation are generally repressed. Genomic imprinting occurs when one of the parental alleles is methylated, i.e, when there is inherited allele-specific methylation (ASM). A special case of imprinting occurs during X chromosome inactivation in females, where one of the two X chromosomes is silenced, in order to achieve dosage compensation between the sexes. Another more widespread form of ASM is sequence dependent (SD-ASM), where ASM is linked to a nearby heterozygous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP).\n\nWe developed a method to screen for genomic regions that exhibit loss or gain of ASM in samples from two conditions (treatments, diseases, etc.). The method relies on the availability of bisulfite sequencing data from multiple samples of the two conditions. We leverage other established computational methods to screen for these regions within a new R package called DAMEfinder. It calculates an ASM score for all CpG sites or pairs in the genome of each sample, and then quantifies the change in ASM between conditions. It then clusters nearby CpG sites with consistent change into regions.\n\nIn the absence of SNP information, our method relies only on reads to quantify ASM. This novel ASM score compares favourably to current methods that also screen for ASM. Not only does it easily discern between imprinted and non-imprinted regions, but also females from males based on X chromosome inactivation. We also applied DAMEfinder to a colorectal cancer dataset and observed that colorectal cancer subtypes are distinguishable according to their ASM signature. We also re-discover known cases of loss of imprinting.\n\nWe have designed DAMEfinder to detect regions of differential ASM (DAMEs), which is a more refined definition of differential methylation, and can therefore help in breaking down the complexity of DNA methylation and its influence in development and disease.

bioinformatics↗

The proto CpG island methylator phenotype of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps

Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) are the putative precursors of the {small tilde}20% of colon cancers with the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), but their molecular features are poorly understood. We used high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression to investigate the epigenetic phenotype of SSA/Ps. Fresh-tissue samples of 17 SSA/Ps and (for comparison purposes) 15 conventional adenomas (cADNs)--each with a matched sample of normal mucosa-- were prospectively collected during colonoscopy (total no. samples analyzed: 64). DNA and RNA were extracted from each sample. DNA was subjected to bisulfite next-generation sequencing to assess methylation levels at {small tilde}2.7 million CpG sites located predominantly in gene regulatory regions and spanning 80.5Mb ({small tilde}2.5% of the genome); RNA was sequenced to define the samples transcriptomes. An independent series of 61 archival lesions was used for targeted verification of DNA methylation findings. Compared with normal mucosa samples, SSA/Ps and cADNs exhibited markedly remodeled methylomes. In cADNs, hypomethylated regions were far more numerous (18,417 vs 4288 in SSA/Ps) and rarely affected CpG islands/shores. SSA/Ps seemed to have escaped this wave of demethylation. Cytosine hypermethylation in SSA/Ps was more pervasive (hypermethylated regions: 22,147 vs 15,965 in cADNs; hypermethylated genes: 4938 vs 3443 in cADNs) and more extensive (region for region), and it occurred mainly within CpG islands and shores. Given its resemblance to the CIMP typical of SSA/Ps putative descendant colon cancers, we refer to the SSA/P methylation phenotype as proto-CIMP. Verification studies of six hypermethylated regions (3 SSA/P-specific and 3 common) demonstrated the high potential of DNA methylation markers for predicting the diagnosis of SSA/Ps and cADNs. Surprisingly, proto-CIMP in SSA/Ps was associated with upregulated gene expression (n=618 genes vs 349 that were downregulated); downregulation was more common in cADNs (n=712 vs 516 upregulated genes). The epigenetic landscape of SSA/Ps differs markedly from that of cADNs. These differences are a potentially rich source of novel tissue-based and noninvasive biomarkers that can add precision to the clinical management of the two most frequent colon-cancer precursors.

cancer biology↗