Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Marquand, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Marquand, A..

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Trajectories of brain organisation transition from predicting externalising to internalising symptoms across adolescence

Understanding the dynamics of brain-behaviour relationships during adolescence is critical for elucidating the neurodevelopmental basis of mental health. Leveraging two large-scale longitudinal cohorts--the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) and IMAGEN studies, comprising over 10,000 participants aged 10 to 22 years with six waves of multimodal neuroimaging and behavioural data, we applied multi-view sparse canonical correlation analysis to investigate evolving associations between structural MRI, resting-state functional connectivity, and multi-domain behavioural measures. Our findings reveal four fundamental patterns of developmental reorganisation in brain-psychopathology relationships. First, symptom profiles evolved from predominantly externalising features (aggression, attention problems) at ages 10-12 toward global psychopathology by age 14, then transitioned toward internalising features (e.g., anxiety, depression) by ages 19-22, reflecting fundamental shifts in vulnerability from behavioural dysregulation to affective disturbance. Second, cortical thickness exhibited negative associations with externalising symptom profiles throughout development. During early adolescence (ages 10-14) this was driven by broadly distributed decreases across sensorimotor, temporal, visual, and cingulate regions alongside overall mean cortical thickness. After 14, this diffuse pattern shifted towards late maturing association cortices, notably the dorsolateral prefrontal and lateral temporal cortices. Third, this was accompanied by subcortical effects that exhibited greater age-specificity: whilst cerebellar volume contributions were evident at most timepoints, basal ganglia volume influence was principally evident in early development (ages 10-12), with thalamic structures and global subcortical grey matter volume becoming dominant at age 14, marking a transition in which subcortical structures mediate psychopathology associations. Fourth, functional connectivity showed a more dynamic developmental trajectory. During early adolescence, symptom associations were driven by positive connectivity between cognitive control and sensorimotor networks, whereas late adolescence exhibited predominantly positive connectivity patterns, transitioning from dense sensorimotor-frontoparietal configurations to more specific patterns involving the central executive and default-mode networks. These findings fundamentally challenge static biomarker models, demonstrating that adolescent psychopathology reflects developmentally contingent brain-behaviour relationships rather than static neural markers. Age 14 emerges as a critical inflection point marked by convergent thalamic reconfiguration, global subcortical grey matter dominance, and symptom profile transitions. This work provides an empirical foundation for precision mental health strategies tailored to specific developmental windows, with implications for reducing psychiatric burden in youth.

neuroscience↗

Latent Representations of Early Brain Development: A Multivariate Normative Model of Brian Structure and Behaviour

Individual variation in neurodevelopment plays a central role in shaping cognitive abilities and behavioural profiles, influencing both typical functioning and risk for neurodevelopmental conditions. While much research has focused on characterising trajectories of brain structure changes during development, this typically entails assessing brain regions individually, overlooking the multivariate nature of neuroimaging data. In this study, we trained an autoencoder to map latent representations of childrens brain development using T1-weighted MRI scans from a paediatric cohort (n = 564, 55% male, mean age 4.90 years, age range [0.11,15.38]). This approach enabled us to establish multivariate normative models of brain structure, providing a more comprehensive framework for understanding neurodevelopmental variation. The latent space representation from this model effectively captured demographic variables (age and sex), while preserving both global and local structural features. The model accurately reconstructed the data, having mean reconstruction of 0.04 {+/-} 0.01, whilst also capturing demographic features with classification accuracy for sex of 84% {+/-} 4%, and a mean absolute error of 0.79 {+/-} 0.06 years for age prediction, highlighting its sensitivity to developmental changes. Further, we validated the approach using correlation analysis to show that deviations from the latent norms were significantly associated with multiple cognitive and behavioural measures, suggesting that variations in brain structure may reflect individual differences in neurodevelopment. Finally, we generated reference brain images that represent typical development and used them to visualise structural differences in individuals who deviate from this normative pattern. Our findings demonstrate that semi-supervised autoencoders, combined with multivariate normative modelling, offer a framework for characterizing neurodevelopmental trajectories. This approach can identify meaningful deviations associated with cognition and behaviour and has potential future applications across the lifespan.

developmental biology↗

The Art of Not Knowing: Accommodating Structured Missingness in Biomedical Research

Missing data remain a ubiquitous and critical challenge in large-scale clinical studies. Despite advances in imputation, most existing methods fail to address structured missingness, where data are missing according a deterministic pattern and which arise due to systematic patterns introduced by experimental design, site protocols, or cohort differences. These patterns violate key assumptions of most imputation algorithms, yet their impact is rarely evaluated. We demonstrate that structured missingness is a fundamental challenge to drawing valid inferences from standard imputation techniques. First, we present a comprehensive framework for understanding and accommodating the effects of structured missingness. Next, we show through simulations and real-world psychometric data with structured missingness, that widely used algorithms optimised for numerical precision (e.g., Extra Trees, AutoComplete) underperform due to site effects, while donor-based methods (e.g., MICE, hierarchical MICE) better preserve multivariate structure. We propose a novel hierarchical approach that provides optimal performance in simulated and experimental data. Finally, we show that commonly used accuracy metrics, such as mean squared error can obscure these failures, and are therefore inadequate for the evaluation of structured missingness. In contrast, other divergence-based metrics offer a more sensitive and interpretable alternative. We apply this approach to harmonising psychometric data across cohorts, which provides excellent item-level alignment across different instruments. Our study highlights the need for a paradigm shift in handling missing data within biomedical research, moving beyond conventional imputation frameworks to develop tools that can account for structured missingness. This shift is essential for ensuring reliable inference in multi-site clinical studies, precision medicine, and large-scale population analyses.

neuroscience↗

One-shot normative modelling of whole-brain functional connectivity

Many brain diseases and disorders lack objective measures of brain function as indicators of pathology. The search for brain function biomarkers is complicated by the fact that these conditions are often heterogenous and described as a spectrum from normal to abnormal rather than a sick-healthy dichotomy. Normative modelling addresses these challenges by characterizing the normal variation of brain function given sex and age and identifying abnormalities as deviations from this norm. Focusing on functional connectivity (FC) as a way to capture the network properties of the brains activity, we here argue that the pathological effects of neurological or psychiatric disease lie at the systemic level, and that whole-brain normative models are more suitable to capture individual variations associated to these complex conditions than existing localized approaches that analyze one connection at a time. To be able to capture the whole-brain effects of disease, we thus propose Functional Connectivity Integrative Normative Modelling (FUNCOIN) as a novel whole-brain approach to normative modelling of FC. Using FUNCOIN and UK Biobank resting-state fMRI data from 46,000 healthy subjects across training and testing sets, we found that subjects with bipolar disorder and Parkinsons disease were significantly, and substantially, more likely than healthy subjects to exhibit abnormal FC patterns, which was not seen in localized models. Subjects with bipolar disorder divided into two distinct subgroups characterized by different brain function deviations. In Parkinsons disease subjects, abnormal FC patterns were significant even on scans up to 8 years before diagnosis.

neuroscience↗

Generating Synthetic Task-based Brain Fingerprints for Population Neuroscience Using Deep Learning

Task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (tb-fMRI) reveals individual differences in the neural basis of cognitive functions by linking specific tasks to neural responses. However, scaling tb-fMRI to population-level studies is challenging due to its cognitive demands, variations in task design across studies, and the limited scope of tasks in large datasets. To address this, we propose DeepTaskGen, a deep-learning approach that generates non-acquired task-based contrast maps from resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data. Our approach enables generating synthetic task images for non-acquired tasks within the study protocol. We validate this approach using the Human Connectome Project lifespan data, then generate 47 contrast maps from 7 different cognitive tasks for over 20,000 individuals from UK Biobank. DeepTaskGen outperforms several benchmarks in generating synthetic task-contrast maps, exhibiting superior reconstruction performance while retaining inter-individual variation essential for biomarker development. Notably, we further showed that synthetic task contrast maps achieved similar or greater performance compared to actual task contrast maps and resting-state connectomes for predicting a wide range of demographic, cognitive, and clinical variables. This approach will facilitate the study of individual differences and the generation of task-related biomarkers by enabling the generation of arbitrary functional cognitive tasks from readily available rs-fMRI data.

neuroscience↗

Objective QC for diffusion MRI data: artefact detection using normative modelling

Diffusion MRI is a neuroimaging modality used to evaluate brain structure at a microscopic level and can be exploited to map white matter fibre bundles and microstructure in the brain. One common issue is the presence of artefacts, such as acquisition artefacts, physiological artefacts, distortions or image processing-related artefacts. These may lead to problems with other downstream processes and can bias subsequent analyses. In this work we use normative modelling to create a semi-automated pipeline for detecting diffusion imaging artefacts and errors by modelling 24 white matter imaging derived phenotypes from the UK Biobank dataset. The considered features comprised 4 microstructural features (from models with different complexity such as fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity from a diffusion tensor model and parameters from neurite orientation, dispersion and density models), each within six pre-selected white matter tracts of various sizes and geometrical complexity (corpus callosum, bilateral corticospinal tract and uncinate fasciculus and fornix). Our method was compared to two traditional quality control approaches: a visual quality control protocol performed on 500 subjects and quantitative quality control using metrics derived from image pre-processing. The normative modelling framework proves to be comprehensive and efficient in detecting diffusion imaging artefacts arising from various sources (such as susceptibility induced distortions or motion), as well as outliers resulting from inaccurate processing (such as erroneous spatial registrations). This is an important contribution by virtue of this methods ability to identify the two problem sources (i) image artefacts and (ii) processing errors, which subsequently allows for a better understanding of our data and informs on inclusion/exclusion criteria of participants.

neuroscience↗

Using normative models pre-trained on cross-sectional data to evaluate longitudinal changes in neuroimaging data

Longitudinal neuroimaging studies offer valuable insight into intricate dynamics of brain development, ageing, and disease progression over time. However, prevailing analytical approaches rooted in our understanding of population variation are primarily tailored for cross-sectional studies. To fully harness the potential of longitudinal neuroimaging data, we have to develop and refine methodologies that are adapted to longitudinal designs, considering the complex interplay between population variation and individual dynamics. We build on normative modelling framework, which enables the evaluation of an individuals position compared to a population standard. We extend this framework to evaluate an individuals longitudinal change compared to the longitudinal change reflected by the (population) standard dynamics. Thus, we exploit the existing normative models pre-trained on over 58,000 individuals and adapt the framework so that they can also be used in the evaluation of longitudinal studies. Specifically, we introduce a quantitative metric termed "z-diff" score, which serves as an indicator of a temporal change of an individual compared to a population standard. Notably, our framework offers advantages such as flexibility in dataset size and ease of implementation. To illustrate our approach, we applied it to a longitudinal dataset of 98 patients diagnosed with early-stage schizophrenia who underwent MRI examinations shortly after diagnosis and one year later. Compared to cross-sectional analyses, which showed global thinning of grey matter at the first visit, our method revealed a significant normalisation of grey matter thickness in the frontal lobe over time. Furthermore, this result was not observed when using more traditional methods of longitudinal analysis, making our approach more sensitive to temporal changes. Overall, our framework presents a flexible and effective methodology for analysing longitudinal neuroimaging data, providing insights into the progression of a disease that would otherwise be missed when using more traditional approaches.

neuroscience↗

Accommodating site variation in neuroimaging data using hierarchical and Bayesian models

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThe potential of normative modeling to make individualized predictions from neuroimaging data has enabled inferences that go beyond the case-control approach. However, site effects are often confounded with variables of interest in a complex manner and can bias estimates of normative models, which has impeded the application of normative models to large multi-site neuroimaging data sets. In this study, we suggest accommodating for these site effects by including them as random effects in a hierarchical Bayesian model. We compared the performance of a linear and a non-linear hierarchical Bayesian model in modeling the effect of age on cortical thickness. We used data of 570 healthy individuals from the ABIDE (autism brain imaging data exchange) data set in our experiments. In addition, we used data from individuals with autism to test whether our models are able to retain clinically useful information while removing site effects. We compared the proposed single stage hierarchical Bayesian method to several harmonization techniques commonly used to deal with additive and multiplicative site effects using a two stage regression, including regressing out site and harmonizing for site with ComBat, both with and without explicitly preserving variance related to age and sex as biological variation of interest. In addition, we made predictions from raw data, in which site has not been accommodated for. The proposed hierarchical Bayesian method showed the best predictive performance according to multiple metrics. Beyond that, the resulting z-scores showed little to no residual site effects, yet still retained clinically useful information. In contrast, performance was particularly poor for the regression model and the ComBat model in which age and sex were not explicitly modeled. In all two stage harmonization models, predictions were poorly scaled, suffering from a loss of more than 90 % of the original variance. Our results show the value of hierarchical Bayesian regression methods for accommodating site variation in neuroimaging data, which provides an alternative to harmonization techniques. While the approach we propose may have broad utility, our approach is particularly well suited to normative modelling where the primary interest is in accurate modelling of inter-subject variation and statistical quantification of deviations from a reference model. 1 HighlightsO_LIDevelopment and presentation of normative modeling approach based on hierarchical Bayesian modeling that can be applied to large multi-site neuroimaging data sets. C_LIO_LIComparison of performance of Hierarchical Bayesian model including site as predictor to several common ways to harmonize for multi-site effects. C_LIO_LIPresentation of normative modeling as site correction tool. C_LI

bioinformatics↗

Atypical brain asymmetry in autism - a candidate for clinically meaningful stratification

BackgroundAutism Spectrum Disorder (henceforth autism) is a highly heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition with few effective treatments for core and associated features. To make progress we need to both identify and validate neural markers that help to parse heterogeneity to tailor therapies to specific neurobiological profiles. Atypical hemispheric lateralization is a stable feature across studies in autism, however its potential of lateralization as a neural stratification marker has not been widely examined. MethodsIn order to dissect heterogeneity in lateralization in autism, we used the large EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project dataset comprising 352 individuals with autism and 233 neurotypical (NT) controls as well as a replication dataset from ABIDE (513 autism, 691 NT) using a promising approach that moves beyond mean-group comparisons. We derived grey matter voxelwise laterality values for each subject and modelled individual deviations from the normative pattern of brain laterality across age using normative modeling. ResultsResults showed that individuals with autism had highly individualized patterns of both extreme right- and leftward deviations, particularly in language-, motor- and visuospatial regions, associated with symptom severity. Language delay (LD) explained most variance in extreme rightward patterns, whereas core autism symptom severity explained most variance in extreme leftward patterns. Follow-up analyses showed that a stepwise pattern emerged with individuals with autism with LD showing more pronounced rightward deviations than autism individuals without LD. ConclusionOur analyses corroborate the need for novel (dimensional) approaches to delineate the heterogeneous neuroanatomy in autism, and indicate atypical lateralization may constitute a neurophenotype for clinically meaningful stratification in autism.

neuroscience↗

Evaluating the evidence for biotypes of depression: attempted replication of Drysdale et.al. 2017

BackgroundPsychiatric disorders are highly heterogeneous, defined based on symptoms with little connection to potential underlying biological mechanisms. A possible approach to dissect biological heterogeneity is to look for biologically meaningful subtypes. A recent study Drysdale et al. (2017) showed promising results along this line by simultaneously using resting state fMRI and clinical data and identified four distinct subtypes of depression with different clinical profiles and abnormal resting state fMRI connectivity. These subtypes were predictive of treatment response to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy.\n\nObjectiveHere, we attempted to replicate the procedure followed in the Drysdale et al. study and their findings in an independent dataset of a clinically more heterogeneous sample of 187 participants with depression and anxiety. We aimed to answer the following questions: 1) Using the same procedure, can we find a statistically significant and reliable relationship between brain connectivity and clinical symptoms? 2) Is the observed relationship similar to the one found in the original study? 3) Can we identify distinct and reliable subtypes? 4) Do they have similar clinical profiles as the subtypes identified in the original study?\n\nMethodsWe followed the original procedure as closely as possible, including a canonical correlation analysis to find a low dimensional representation of clinically relevant resting state fMRI features, followed by hierarchical clustering to identify subtypes. We extended the original procedure using additional statistical tests, to test the statistical significance of the relationship between resting state fMRI and clinical data, and the existence of distinct subtypes. Furthermore, we examined the stability of the whole procedure using resampling.\n\nResults and ConclusionWe were not able to replicate the findings of the original study. Relationships between brain connectivity and clinical symptoms were not statistically significant and we also did not find clearly distinct subtypes of depression. We argue, that based on our rigorous approach and in-depth review of the original results, that the evidence for the existence of the distinct resting state connectivity based subtypes of depression is weak and should be interpreted with caution.

neuroscience↗

Frequency-specific directed interactions in the human brain network for language

The brains remarkable capacity for language requires bidirectional interactions between functionally specialized brain regions. We used magnetoencephalography to investigate interregional interactions in the brain network for language, while 102 participants were reading sentences. Using Granger causality analysis, we identified inferior frontal cortex and anterior temporal regions to receive widespread input, and middle temporal regions to send widespread output. This fits well with the notion that these regions play a central role in language processing. Characterization of the functional topology of this network, using data-driven matrix factorization, which allowed for partitioning into a set of subnetworks, revealed directed connections at distinct frequencies of interaction. Connections originating from temporal regions peaked at alpha frequency, whereas connections originating from frontal and parietal regions peaked at beta frequency. These findings indicate that processing different types of linguistic information may depend on the contributions of distinct brain rhythms.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryCommunication between language relevant areas in the brain is supported by rhythmic synchronization, where different rhythms reflect the direction of information flow.

neuroscience↗