Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mantell, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Mantell, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Experimental Evaluation of Methods for Real-Time EEG Phase-Specific Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Brain oscillations reflect system-level neural dynamics and capture the current brain state. These brain rhythms can be measured noninvasively in humans with electroencephalography (EEG). Up and down states of brain oscillations capture local changes in neuronal excitability. This makes them a promising target for non-invasive brain stimulation methods such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). Real-time EEG-TMS systems record ongoing brain signals, process the data, and deliver TMS stimuli at a specific brain state. Despite their promise to increase the temporal specificity of stimulation, best practices and technical solutions are still under development. Here, we implement and compare state-of-the-art methods (Fourier based, Autoregressive Prediction) for real-time EEG-TMS and evaluate their performance both in silico and experimentally. We further propose a new robust algorithm for delivering real-time EEG phase-specific stimulation based on short prerecorded EEG training data (Educated Temporal Prediction). We found that Educated Temporal Prediction performs at the same level or better than Fourier-based or Autoregressive methods both in silico and in vivo, while being computationally more efficient. Further, we document a dependency of EEG signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on algorithm accuracy across all algorithms. In conclusion, our results can give important insights for real-time TMS-EEG technical development as well as experimental design.

neuroscience↗

Comparative Modeling of Transcranial Magnetic and Electric Stimulation in Mouse, Monkey, and Human

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electric stimulation (TES) are increasingly popular methods to noninvasively affect brain activity. However, their mechanism of action and dose-response characteristics remain under active investigation. Translational studies in animals play a pivotal role in these efforts due to a larger neuroscientific toolset enabled by invasive recordings. In order to translate knowledge gained in animal studies to humans, it is crucial to generate comparable stimulation conditions with respect to the induced electric field in the brain. Here, we conduct a finite element method (FEM) modeling study of TMS and TES electric fields in a mouse, capuchin monkey, and human model. We systematically evaluate the induced electric fields and analyze their relationship to head and brain anatomy. We find that with increasing head size, TMS-induced electric field strength first increases and then decreases according to a two-term exponential function. TES-induced electric field strength strongly decreases from smaller to larger specimen with up to 100x fold differences across species. Our results can serve as a basis to compare and match stimulation parameters across studies in animals and humans.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LITranslational research in brain stimulation should account for large differences in induced electric fields in different organisms\nC_LIO_LIWe simulate TMS and TES electric fields using anatomically realistic finite element models in three species: mouse, monkey, and human\nC_LIO_LITMS with a 70 mm figure-8 coil creates an approximately 2-times weaker electric field in a mouse brain than in monkey and human brains, where electric field strength is comparable\nC_LIO_LITwo-electrode TES creates an approximately 100-times stronger electric field in a mouse brain and 3.5-times stronger electric field in a monkey brain than in a human brain\nC_LI

neuroscience↗