Biology subjects

Manoel, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Manoel, D..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Predicted mechanistic impacts of human protein missense variants

Genome sequencing efforts have led to the discovery of tens of millions of protein missense variants found in the human population with the majority of these having no annotated role and some likely contributing to trait variation and disease. Sequence-based artificial intelligence approaches have become highly accurate at predicting variants that are detrimental to the function of proteins but they do not inform on mechanisms of disruption. Here we combined sequence and structure-based methods to perform proteome-wide prediction of deleterious variants with information on their impact on protein stability, protein-protein interactions and small-molecule binding pockets. AlphaFold2 structures were used to predict approximately 100,000 small-molecule binding pockets and stability changes for over 200 million variants. To inform on protein-protein interfaces we used AlphaFold2 to predict structures for nearly 500,000 protein complexes. We illustrate the value of mechanism-aware variant effect predictions to study the relation between protein stability and abundance and the structural properties of interfaces underlying trans protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs). We characterised the distribution of mechanistic impacts of protein variants found in patients and experimentally studied example disease linked variants in FGFR1.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

Short-term consumption of ultra-processed semi-synthetic diets impairs the sense of smell and brain metabolism in mice

The prevalence of highly-palatable, ultra-processed food in our modern diet has exacerbated obesity rates and contributed to a global health crisis. While accumulating evidence suggests that chronic consumption of ultra-processed semi-synthetic food is detrimental to sensory and neural physiology, it is unclear whether its short-term intake has adverse effects. Here, we assessed how short-term consumption (<2 months) of three ultra-processed diets (one grain-based diet, and two semi-synthetic) influence olfaction and brain metabolism in mice. Our results demonstrate that short-term consumption of semi-synthetic diets, regardless of macronutrient composition, adversely affect odor-guided behaviors, physiological responses to odorants, transcriptional profiles in the olfactory mucosa and brain regions, and brain glucose metabolism and mitochondrial respiration. These findings reveal that even short periods of ultra-processed semi-synthetic food consumption are sufficient to cause early olfactory and brain abnormalities, which has the potential to alter food choices and influence the risk of developing metabolic disease.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Deconstructing the mouse olfactory percept through an olfactory ethological atlas

Odor perception in non-humans is poorly understood. Here, we generated the most comprehensive murine olfactory ethological atlas to date, consisting of behavioral responses to a diverse panel of 73 odorants, including 12 at multiple concentrations. These data revealed that the mouse behavior is incredibly diverse, and changes in response to odor identity and intensity. Using only behavioral responses, ~30% of the 73 odorants could be identified with high accuracy (>96%) by a trained classifier. Mouse behavior occupied a low-dimensional space, consistent with analyses of human olfactory perception. While mouse olfactory behavior is difficult to predict from the corresponding human olfactory percept, three fundamental properties are shared: odor valence is the primary axis of olfactory perception; the physicochemical properties of odorants can predict the olfactory percept; and odorant concentration quantitatively and qualitatively impacts olfactory perception. These results provide a template for future comparative studies of olfactory percepts among species.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Interspecific variation of olfactory preferences in flies, mice, and humans

Aiming to unravel interspecific differences in olfactory preferences, we performed comparative studies of odor valence in flies, mice, and humans. Our analysis revealed that odor preferences of flies correlate positively with the ones of mice and negatively with the ones of humans, but found no evidence supporting the hypothesis that humans and mice prefer the same odors. We further find that odorants eliciting the highest and lowest preferences are often advertising critical biological sources (e.g., food or oviposition sites), suggesting that evolutionary pressures reflecting the ecological needs of each species shape olfactory preferences.

neuroscience↗