Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mancinelli, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Mancinelli, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Evolution of visual time throughout goal driven action learning

Timing is intimately woven into human cognition and behaviour, underscoring peoples ability of comprehending speech, playing instruments and competing in sports. Converging evidence suggests that our perceptual experience of time is grounded in our ability to control actions: time processing leverages motor control neural machinery, and perceived time is significantly distorted in proximity of action. However, the dynamic interplay between timing and action systems remains unexplored, particularly in goal-directed contexts where action control is gradually refined through practice. Through combined behavioural, neural and modelling approaches, we investigate how time processing gradually evolves as participants gain experience in goal-driven manual reaching actions, varying in terms of action-plan specificity. Participants judged brief visual durations while preparing hand movements aimed at visual targets displayed on a monitor. Subjective time expanded in the foreperiod preceding action onset, and this effect increased over trials, mirroring gradual improvements in action readiness as motor plans became more rapidly and efficiently deployed. Representation Similarity Analysis, integrating electroencephalographic and behavioural data, reveals that actions shape timing through independent mechanisms: planning specific behaviours shapes how duration information is written into timekeeping neural circuits as stimuli unfold (encoding). Parallely, more general aspects of motor engagement and anticipation shape how duration information is read-out from timing circuits following stimulus presentation (decoding). These findings highlight a dynamic, learning-driven coupling between perceptual time and motor control, where subjective time is recalibrated as goal-directed action preparation is optimized, shaped through independent time encoding and decoding mechanisms. Significance statementDespite lacking dedicated sensory and neural systems for duration, humans reveal a highly developed sense of time, for instance when noticing subtle tempo changes in music. We show that perceptual understanding of time is linked to the ability of learning and fine-tuning action: our internal metric of time shifts as action preparation processes are gradually refined, affecting how quickly behaviours are planned and executed. This interaction is mediated by independent neural processes affecting the encoding (online monitoring) and decoding (offline readout) of duration. These findings shift our understanding of timing, from a passive sensory readout to one that is actively constructed and finetuned through action learning, and provide a mechanistic account of neural processes linking action preparation to time processing

neuroscience↗

Subjective Beliefs In, Out, and About Control: A Quantitative Analysis

A critical facet of adjusting one’s behaviour after succeeding or failing at a task is assigning responsibility for the ultimate outcome. Humans have trait- and state-like tendencies to implicate aspects of their own behaviour (called ‘internal’ ascriptions) or facets of the particular task or Lady Luck (‘chance’). However, how these tendencies interact with actual performance is unclear. We designed a novel task in which subjects had to learn the likelihood of achieving their goals, and the extent to which this depended on their efforts. High internality (Levenson I-score) was associated with decision making patterns that are less vulnerable to failure, and at the same time less oriented to more rewarding achievements. Our computational analyses suggested that this depended heavily on the adjustment in the perceived achievability of riskier goals following failure. We found beliefs about chance not to be explanatory of choice behaviour in our task. Beliefs about powerful others were strong predictors of behaviour, but only when subjects lacked substantial influence over the outcome. Our results provide an evidentiary basis for heuristics and learning differences that underlie the formation and maintenance of control expectations by the self.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

animal behavior and cognition↗